10 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Virgil Lee Brownlee v. Michael Haleygreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., Brownlee v. Haley, 306 F.3d 1043, 1050 (11th Cir.2002) (“After the jury has returned its advisory verdict at the sentencing phase, the trial judge orders and receives a presentence investigation report, hears further arguments, and may receive additional evidence concerning the aggravating and mitigating factors.”). 2009See, e.g., Brownlee v. Haley, 306 F.3d 1043, 1050 (11th Cir.2002) (‘After the jury has returned its advisory verdict at the sentencing phase, the trial judge orders and receives a presentence investigation report, hears further arguments, and may receive additional evidence concerning the aggravating and mitigating factors.’).” 123 So.3d at 1030 . | 2 | 2 |
Woodward v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See, e.g., Brownlee v. Haley, 306 F.3d 1043, 1050 (11th Cir.2002) (‘After the jury has returned its advisory verdict at the sentencing phase, the trial judge orders and receives a presentence investigation report, hears further arguments, and may receive additional evidence concerning the aggravating and mitigating factors.’).” 123 So.3d at 1030 . | 1 | 1 |
Sneed v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Sneed v. State, 783 So.2d 841 (Ala.Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Morrison v. Stategreen2 sentences1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State, 500 So.2d 36, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). 1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State , 500 So.2d 36 , 45 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Russell v. State
neutral
2 sentences2016This Court affirmed Russell's conviction and sentence in Russell v. State , 261 So. 3d 397 (Ala. Crim. 2016This Court affirmed Russell's conviction and sentence in Russell v. State , 261 So. 3d 397 (Ala. Crim. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Kirksey v. State
green
2 sentences2016This Court affirmed Kirksey's conviction and sentence in Kirksey v. State , 191 So.3d 810 (Ala. Crim. 2016This Court affirmed Kirksey's conviction and sentence in Kirksey v. State , 191 So.3d 810 (Ala. Crim. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Ex Parte Waldrop
green
1 sentence2005"An additional consideration by this Court is the guidance provided by the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Waldrop, [ 859 So.2d 1181 (Ala.2002)]. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Embrey v. State
green
2 sentences1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) 1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Kuenzel v. State
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ex Parte Kuenzel
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ex Parte Waldrop
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Varner v. State
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bradley v. Puckett
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Luna v. United States
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ex Parte Taylor
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Cook v. State
green
1 sentence1995Embrey v. State , 283 Ala. 110 , 118 , 214 So.2d 567 (1968). " 'This line of argument is "within the latitude allowed prosecutors in their exhortations to the jury to discharge their duties in such a manner as, not only to punish crime, but to protect the public from like offenses and as an example to deter others from committing like offenses." Varner v. State , 418 So.2d 961 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Cook v. State , 369 So.2d 1243 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 369 So.2d 1251 (Ala. 1978). . . .' " Kuenzel v. State , 577 So.2d 474 , 503 (Ala.Crim.App. 1990) | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ackermann v. United States
green
2 sentences1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State, 500 So.2d 36, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). 1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State , 500 So.2d 36 , 45 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hampton v. Alaska
green
2 sentences1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State, 500 So.2d 36, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). 1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State , 500 So.2d 36 , 45 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Ex Parte Jesse Lee Morrison
green
2 sentences1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State, 500 So.2d 36, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). 1994"Therefore, while the aggravating circumstances must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt at the guilt phase, the jury may return the death penalty if it finds at the penalty phase simply that the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances." Morrison v. State , 500 So.2d 36 , 45 (Ala.Crim.App. 1985), aff'd, 500 So.2d 57 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1007 , 107 S.Ct. 1634 , 95 L.Ed.2d 207 (1987). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.