9 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Discipline of Lernergreen2 sentences2017Based on our review of the record and weighing the duties violated, Kennedy's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by his misconduct, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, In re we Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008), conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. 2017Based on our review of the record and weighing the duties violated, Kennedy's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by his misconduct, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, In re we Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246 , 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008), conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. | 5 | 5 |
State Bar of Nevada v. Claibornegreen2 sentences2016And further considering the aggravating and mitigating factors, we agree that an 18-month suspension is appropriate and sufficient to serve the purpose of attorney discipline to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213 , 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988). 2 Because Lozensky's unauthorized practice was not persistent, reflecting a conscious objective to violate his CLE suspension and engage in the unauthorized practice of law, we conclude that disbarment is not warranted. 2016And further considering the aggravating and mitigating factors, we agree that an 18-month suspension is appropriate and sufficient to serve the purpose of attorney discipline to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213 , 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988). 2 Because Lozensky's unauthorized practice was not persistent, reflecting a conscious objective to violate his CLE suspension and engage in the unauthorized practice of law, we conclude that disbarment is not warranted. | 3 | 3 |
Leonard v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g., Leonard v. State, 114 Nev. 1196, 1217 , 969 P.2d 288, 301 (1998). 2019See, e.g., Leonard v. State, 114 Nev. 1196, 1217 , 969 P.2d 288, 301 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
In re Pitregreen1 sentence2016Cf. In re Pitre, 903 So. 2d 1130, 1135 (La. 2005) (concluding that disbarment was appropriate where lawyer filed multiple pleadings over a period of several years while CLE suspended, after previously having been admonished by a disciplinary board for practicing while ineligible and being advised by supreme court's clerk's office that he was ineligible). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Proffitt v. Florida
green
1 sentence1990Therefore, when the murder is committed during the course of more than one of the felonies listed, the murder is more aggravated and heinous than it would have been if only one of the felonies were present. 8 In Profitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976), the United States Supreme Court considered a sentencing procedure similar to Nevada’s where the sentencer weighs the aggravating and mitigating factors in imposing the sentence. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.