10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1877–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jewell v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Jewell v. State, 887 N.E.2d 939, 942 (Ind. 2008) (“[F]undamental error is extremely narrow and available only when the record reveals a clearly blatant violation of basic and elementary principles, where the harm or potential for harm cannot be denied, and which violation is so prejudicial to the [defendant’s] rights as to make a fair trial impossible.”). | 1 | 1 |
Rompilla v. Beardred2 sentences2018See Rompilla , 545 U.S. at 385 -86 , 125 S.Ct. 2456 . 2018See Rompilla , 545 U.S. at 385 -86 , 125 S.Ct. 2456 . | 1 | 1 |
Old Town Development Company v. Langfordgreen1 sentence2008Co. v. Langford, 349 N.E.2d 744, 769 (Ind.Ct.App.1976), vacated, 267 Ind. 176 , 369 N.E.2d 404 (Ind. 1977) (collecting cases). | 1 | 1 |
Lloyd v. Stategreen1 sentence2003As to Defendant's contention that his counsel should have objected to final Jury instruction no. 8 as violative of his due process rights, we held above that the instruction was not erroneous. "'When an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on trial counsel's failure to make an objection, the appellant must show that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court'" Lambert v. State, 743 N.E.2d 719, 732 (Ind.2001) (quoting Lloyd v. State, 669 N.E.2d 980, 985 (Ind.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
Lambert v. Stategreen1 sentence2003As to Defendant's contention that his counsel should have objected to final Jury instruction no. 8 as violative of his due process rights, we held above that the instruction was not erroneous. "'When an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on trial counsel's failure to make an objection, the appellant must show that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court'" Lambert v. State, 743 N.E.2d 719, 732 (Ind.2001) (quoting Lloyd v. State, 669 N.E.2d 980, 985 (Ind.1996)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Epps v. State
green
1 sentence2008Co. v. Langford, 349 N.E.2d 744, 769 (Ind.Ct.App.1976), vacated, 267 Ind. 176 , 369 N.E.2d 404 (Ind. 1977) (collecting cases). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Old Town Development Co. v. Langford
green
1 sentence2008Co. v. Langford, 349 N.E.2d 744, 769 (Ind.Ct.App.1976), vacated, 267 Ind. 176 , 369 N.E.2d 404 (Ind. 1977) (collecting cases). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Inlow v. Henderson, Daily, Withrow & DeVoe
green
2 sentences2003Furthermore, we held that "[the probate court and the personal representative are in the best position to assess, among other things, the strength of a claim, the costs to the estate in pursuing it, and the desirability of closing the estate before certain assets depreciate in value." Id. at 399 . 2003Furthermore, we held that "[t]he probate *820 court and the personal representative are in the best position to assess, among other things, the strength of a claim, the costs to the estate in pursuing it, and the desirability of closing the estate before certain assets depreciate in value." Id. at 399 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wheaton
green
2 sentences1978Keeling v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1946), 117 Ind. App. 314 , 69 N.E.2d 613 (recreational building and playground used by Meridian Street Methodist of Indianapolis); and Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wheaton (1948), 118 Ind. App. 38 , 76 N.E.2d 597 (Sisters’ home in a Catholic church and school). 1978Keeling v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1946), 117 Ind. App. 314 , 69 N.E.2d 613 (recreational building and playground used by Meridian Street Methodist of Indianapolis); and Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wheaton (1948), 118 Ind. App. 38 , 76 N.E.2d 597 (Sisters’ home in a Catholic church and school). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Keeling v. Board of Zoning Appeals
green
2 sentences1978Keeling v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1946), 117 Ind. App. 314 , 69 N.E.2d 613 (recreational building and playground used by Meridian Street Methodist of Indianapolis); and Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wheaton (1948), 118 Ind. App. 38 , 76 N.E.2d 597 (Sisters’ home in a Catholic church and school). 1978Keeling v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1946), 117 Ind. App. 314 , 69 N.E.2d 613 (recreational building and playground used by Meridian Street Methodist of Indianapolis); and Board of Zoning Appeals v. Wheaton (1948), 118 Ind. App. 38 , 76 N.E.2d 597 (Sisters’ home in a Catholic church and school). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Hall v. State
green
1 sentence1936No certain lapse of time can be designated, applicable alike to all cases, as raising, or otherwise, the presumption of guilt, from the possession of stolen goods.” The next case considering this question in this state is the case of Hall v. State (1856), 8 Ind. 439 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Duncan v. Lyon
green
1 sentence1887It indulges him even to make as many separate pleas or kinds of defence as he may deem material, provided it be done in due season. * * * But they (respondents) have chosen to abide by one species of defence, and to waive another, and like other litigants in similar cases, they must be concluded by their election.” Duncan v. Lyon, 3 Johns. | 1 | 1887–1887 |
People ex rel. Williams v. Cicott
green
1 sentence1887People v. Cicott, 16 Mich. 283 . | 1 | 1887–1887 |
Engleman v. State
green
1 sentence1877Engleman v. The State, 2 Ind. 91 . | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.