Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tijerino v. Estrellagreen2 sentences2018Because of the strength of this presumption, many courts have held that "a putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the married woman and her husband object." Johnson v. Ruby , 771 So.2d 1275 , 1275-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ; see also Tijerino v. Estrella , 843 So.2d 984 , 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). 2017Because of the strength of this presumption, many courts have held that “a putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the married woman and her husband object.” Johnson v. Ruby, 771 So.2d 1275, 1275-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Tijerino v. Estrella, 843 So.2d 984, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Johnson v. Rubygreen2 sentences2018Because of the strength of this presumption, many courts have held that "a putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the married woman and her husband object." Johnson v. Ruby , 771 So.2d 1275 , 1275-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ; see also Tijerino v. Estrella , 843 So.2d 984 , 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). 2017Because of the strength of this presumption, many courts have held that “a putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the married woman and her husband object.” Johnson v. Ruby, 771 So.2d 1275, 1275-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Tijerino v. Estrella, 843 So.2d 984, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). | 1 | 2 |
In Re Estate of Mardengreen2 sentences2017In re Marden’s Estate, 355 So.2d 121, 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (footnote omitted). 2017In re Marden's Estate, 355 So. 2d 121, 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule Industriesgreen1 sentence1989See Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule Indus., 68 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1953); Joseph v. State, 447 So.2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Hubbart, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
In Re United States of America, Socialist Workers Party v. The Attorney Generalgreen1 sentence1988See generally Suarez v. United States., 582 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir.1978); In re United States, 565 F.2d 19, 22 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied, Bell v. Socialist Workers Party, 463 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 3082 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1978) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1 |
Jose R. Suarez, Jr., and Virginia Peters Suarez v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1988See generally Suarez v. United States., 582 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir.1978); In re United States, 565 F.2d 19, 22 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied, Bell v. Socialist Workers Party, 463 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 3082 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1978) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
King v. Board Of Regents Of The University Of Wisconsin System
green
1 sentence2018“Although a single act can be enough . . . generally, repeated incidents create a stronger claim of hostile environment, with the strength of the claim depending on the number of incidents and the intensity of each incident.” King v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis. Sys., 898 F.2d 533 , 537 (7th Cir. 1990). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Arthur
green
1 sentence2006Mr. Castro argues essentially that the rule applicable to pretrial detention should also apply to pretrial release. [ State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1980)] says otherwise, and the rules are distinct. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Joseph v. State
green
1 sentence1989See Old Plantation Corp. v. Maule Indus., 68 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1953); Joseph v. State, 447 So.2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (Hubbart, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Wainwright v. Demar
green
1 sentence1988See generally Suarez v. United States., 582 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir.1978); In re United States, 565 F.2d 19, 22 (2nd Cir.1977), cert. denied, Bell v. Socialist Workers Party, 463 U.S. 962 , 98 S.Ct. 3082 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1129 (1978) and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Stuart v. Stephanus
green
1 sentence1929So it cannot be said here, as was said in the case of Stuart v. Stephanus, that the bill ‘ ‘complains solely of the mere existence of the chain of title from the United States under which the former owner held, coupled with the allegations that the defendants are persons interested in the property and that their claims are based upon the record *442 title as it existed prior to the issuance and delivery of complainant’s tax deed.” In so far as the amended bill attempted to show that complainant deraigned title in part from the United States ■through various grantees down to Baugher, the holder | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.