Wife bar in Kentucky

2009Then, in 1970, this Court’s predecessor in Kotsiris v. Ling, 451 S.W.2d 411 (Ky.1970), expanded the cause of action for loss of consortium to allow a wife the same claim.

1997Kotsiris, supra .

2021Clearly, there is no basis for a conclusion that the family court’s decision was “arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles.” English, supra at 945 .

1961Hertel v. Hertel, 202 Ky. 422 , 259 S.W. 1025 .

1961Hertel v. Hertel, 202 Ky. 422 , 259 S.W. 1025 .

1956Schaengold v. Behen, 306 Ky. 544 , 208 S.W.2d 726 ; Turner v. Smith, 306 Ky. 551 , 208 S.W.2d 731 .

1956Schaengold v. Behen, 306 Ky. 544 , 208 S.W.2d 726 ; Turner v. Smith, 306 Ky. 551 , 208 S.W.2d 731 .

1956Schaengold v. Behen, 306 Ky. 544 , 208 S.W.2d 726 ; Turner v. Smith, 306 Ky. 551 , 208 S.W.2d 731 .

1956Schaengold v. Behen, 306 Ky. 544 , 208 S.W.2d 726 ; Turner v. Smith, 306 Ky. 551 , 208 S.W.2d 731 .

1927A, case involving facts very much analogous to those found in this case bearing upon the conduct of plaintiff. the wife, is Anderson v. Anderson, 152 Ky. 773 , and in which we held, as we had done in many cases prior thereto and likewise in cases subsequent thereto, that facts creating mere suspicion are'not sufficient to convict the wife of a violation of the marital vow, although they might show that she was considerably indiscreet, and a due consideration of frail human nature necessarily substantiates that conclusion.

1916If the contract had contemplated the immediate severance of the timber from the land, it might be treated as a sale of personalty by the wife under the rule announced in many decisions of this court, that a sale of standing trees in contemplation of their immediate severance from the soil is a constructive severance of them and they pass as chattels: Byassee v. Reese, 4 Met. 372 .

1915In O ’Dell v. Little, supra, where the married woman alone conveyed, her husband joining in the deed only by signing it, and it being ineffectual to pass title, this court said: “The entry was under the wife with the claim of an absolute title against both (husband and wife), and therefore the action must have been brought within three years after the husband’s death, etc.” There is no doubt that Mazy C.

1902Section 2133, Kentucky Statutes, on this subject, provides that the' spouse shall be barred of dower in the other’s property if he or she “voluntarily leave the other and live in adultery, unless they afterward become reconciled and live, together as husband and wife.” McQuinn v. McQuinn ( 110 Ky., 321 ) ( 22 R., 1770 ) ( 61 S. W., 358 .) 3.

1902Section 2133, Kentucky Statutes, on this subject, provides that the' spouse shall be barred of dower in the other’s property if he or she “voluntarily leave the other and live in adultery, unless they afterward become reconciled and live, together as husband and wife.” McQuinn v. McQuinn ( 110 Ky., 321 ) ( 22 R., 1770 ) ( 61 S. W., 358 .) 3.