10 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 2002–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reddishgreen2 sentences2019In State v. Reddish, 181 N.J. 553, 593-94 (2004), the Court expanded the inquiry to include the practical consequences that might hamper a defense when a defendant is allowed to proceed pro se. 2018In State v. Reddish, 181 N.J. 553, 594 (2004), the Court expanded the inquiry to include areas such as whether defendant will experience difficulty in separating his roles as defendant and counsel; whether defendant understands that he not only has the right not to testify, but also the right not to incriminate himself in any manner; whether he understands that he could make comments as counsel from which the jury might infer that he had knowledge of incriminating evidence (and the difficulty in avoiding such comments); and whether he fully understands that if he crosses the line separating co | 1 | 3 |
State v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2015State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208, 300 , 27 A.3d 872 (2011). 2015State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208, 300 , 27 A.3d 872 (2011). | 1 | 3 |
Advance Housing, Inc. v. Township of Teaneckgreen1 sentence2019“Therefore, the determination of whether property is devoted to a charitable purposes depends upon the facts or circumstances of each case.” Ibid. 8 More recently, the Court expanded on the factors to be considered when determining whether a use of property is charitable: Although all relevant considerations cannot be captured by any list given the ever-changing scenarios that will arise, and although each consideration may not necessarily deserve the same weight, here are some [to be considered]: (1) the charitable work done by the private entity will spare the government an expense that ulti | 1 | 1 |
Innes Ex Rel. Innes v. Marzano-Lesnevichgreen2 sentences2016See Innes v. Marzano-Lesnevich, 224 N.J. 584 , 136 A.3d 108 (2016). 6 More to the point is our prior decision in Niles, on which the trial court based its fee award in this matter. 2016See Innes v. Marzano-Lesnevich, 224 N.J. 584 , 136 A.3d 108 (2016). 6 More to the point is our prior decision in Niles, on which the trial court based its fee award in this matter. | 1 | 1 |
Michigan v. Longgreen2 sentences2002The Court expanded this exception to allow a protective search of the passenger compartment of an automobile, to locate weapons, if the officer reasonably believes "that the suspect is dangerous and the suspect may gain immediate control of weapons." Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1049 , 103 S.Ct. 3469, 3481 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 1201, 1220 (1983) (footnote omitted). 2002The Court expanded this exception to allow a protective search of the passenger compartment of an automobile, to locate weapons, if the officer reasonably believes "that the suspect is dangerous and the suspect may gain immediate control of weapons." Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1049 , 103 S.Ct. 3469, 3481 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 1201, 1220 (1983) (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bey
green
2 sentences2019In Bey, 112 N.J. at 83-84 , the Supreme Court laid out a two-part inquiry for trial courts to conduct when "presented with a post-impanelment motion to question the jury about exposure to trial publicity." According to the Bey two- part inquiry, "[t]he court should first examine the information disseminat ed to determine if it has the capacity to prejudice the defendant." Id. at 84 . 2019In Bey, 112 N.J. at 83-84 , the Supreme Court laid out a two-part inquiry for trial courts to conduct when "presented with a post-impanelment motion to question the jury about exposure to trial publicity." According to the Bey two- part inquiry, "[t]he court should first examine the information disseminat ed to determine if it has the capacity to prejudice the defendant." Id. at 84 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2002The Court explained that the officer's reasonable belief must be based on "specific and articulable facts ... taken together with the rational inferences from those facts." Ibid. (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21 , 88 S.Ct. at 1880 , 20 L.Ed. 2d at 906 ). 2002The Court explained that the officer's reasonable belief must be based on "specific and articulable facts ... taken together with the rational inferences from those facts." Ibid. (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21 , 88 S.Ct. at 1880 , 20 L.Ed. 2d at 906 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.