Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1941–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Atamanik v. Real Estate Management, Inc.green2 sentences2006See Atamanik v. Real Estate Mgmt, Inc., 21 N.J.Super. 357 , 91 A.2d 268 (App.Div.1952). 2006See Atamanik v. Real Estate Mgmt, Inc., 21 N.J.Super. 357 , 91 A.2d 268 (App.Div.1952). | 2 | 2 |
Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty.green1 sentence2021See Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Cnty. of Mercer, 169 N.J. 135, 153 (2001) (enlarging the period to challenge municipal solid waste contracts exceeding the maximum duration allowed by the Local Public Contracts Law by ten and fourteen years). | 1 | 1 |
Zuckerman v. National Union Fire Insurancegreen2 sentences1994Zuckerman, supra, 100 N.J. at 307, 495 A. 2d 395 . [3] JPI nevertheless asserts that it had a "reasonable expectation" of coverage during the third policy period because it was an extension of a prior policy and extended that coverage into the period in which the claim was reported. 1994Zuckerman, supra, 100 N.J. at 307, 495 A. 2d 395 . [3] JPI nevertheless asserts that it had a "reasonable expectation" of coverage during the third policy period because it was an extension of a prior policy and extended that coverage into the period in which the claim was reported. | 1 | 1 |
Southland Corp. v. Keatinggreen2 sentences1984This jealousy survived for so lon[g] a period that the principle became firmly embedded in the English common law and was adopted with it by the American courts. [ Southland Corp. v. Keating, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 104 S.Ct. 852, 859 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 1, 13-14 (1984) (quoting H.R. 1984This jealousy survived for so lon[g] a period that the principle became firmly embedded in the English common law and was adopted with it by the American courts. [ Southland Corp. v. Keating, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 104 S.Ct. 852, 859 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 1, 13-14 (1984) (quoting H.R. | 1 | 1 |
Wagner v. Mayor of Newarkgreen1 sentence1960See Wagner v. Newark, 24 N.J. 467 (1957). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1988Masino, 94 N.J. at 445-447 ; Smith, 210 N.J. 1988Masino, 94 N.J. at 445-447 ; Smith, 210 N.J. | 2 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Masino
green
2 sentences1988Masino, 94 N.J. at 445-447 ; Smith, 210 N.J. 1988Masino, 94 N.J. at 445-447 ; Smith, 210 N.J. | 2 | 1988–1988 |
In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing
green
1 sentence2016Ibid. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
First Camden National Bank & Trust Co. v. Collins
neutral
1 sentence1941First Camden, c., Trust Co. v. Collins, 114 N.J. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.