Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hollistergreen1 sentence1971Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Hollister, 74 Conn. 228, 232; Restatement, 4 Property § 386, comment j. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jeffery v. Fitch
green
2 sentences2001Equity does not encourage parties to procrastinate in such cases." Jeffrey v. Finch , 46 Conn. 601 , 605 (1879). 1903Jeffery v. Fitch, 46 Conn. 601, 605 . | 2 | 1903–2001 |
Howard v. Batchelder
neutral
1 sentence1971Howard v. Batchelder, 143 Conn. 328, 336 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Fredericks v. Reincke
green
2 sentences1969The only other situation in which this court has approved the action of a trial court or a judge thereof in allowing an appeal after the period provided under the rule has elapsed without the granting of proper extensions of time under § 413 of the 1951 Practice Book (now Practice Book, 1963, § 665) has been “where on habeas corpus it has been properly determined that a right of appeal required by the federal constitution has been denied,” in which case “any rule restricting an appeal merely because of lapse of time necessarily is ineffective to preclude an appeal in accordance with federal co 1969The only other situation in which this court has approved the action of a trial court or a judge thereof in allowing an appeal after the period provided under the rule has elapsed without the granting of proper extensions of time under § 413 of the 1951 Practice Book (now Practice Book, 1963, § 665) has been “where on habeas corpus it has been properly determined that a right of appeal required by the federal constitution has been denied,” in which case “any rule restricting an appeal merely because of lapse of time necessarily is ineffective to preclude an appeal in accordance with federal co | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Coit v. Comstock
green
1 sentence1964The 1885 act was obviously passed to change the rule laid down in Coit v. Comstock, 51 Conn. 352, 386 , insofar as that case held that such a bequest was invalid if it was to be operative beyond the period permitted by the rule against perpetuities. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Bristol v. Bristol
green
2 sentences1956Bristol v. Bristol, 53 Conn. 242, 254 , 5 A. 687 ; 1 Perry, Trusts & Trustees (7th Ed.) p. 642, §383; 1 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5th Ed.) §152; 1 Scott, Trusts, §112; 54 Am. 1956Bristol v. Bristol, 53 Conn. 242, 254 , 5 A. 687 ; 1 Perry, Trusts & Trustees (7th Ed.) p. 642, §383; 1 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5th Ed.) §152; 1 Scott, Trusts, §112; 54 Am. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.