variance exception (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

variance exception in New Jersey

10 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Hill Homeowners Ass'n v. Passaic Zon. Bd. of Adj.green
njsuperctappdiv · 1974 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1976–1980
2 sentences

1980Contra, Hill Homeowners v. Passaic Zoning Bd. of Adj., 129 N.J.

1976We disagree with the contrary conclusion of the trial court in Hill Homeowners v. Passaic Zoning Bd., 129 N.J.

12
Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumontgreen
nj · 1954 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1957–1957
1 sentence

1957Borough of Cresskill v. Dumont, 15 N.J. 238, 249 (1954).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Perlmart of Lacey, Inc. v. Lacey Tp. Planning Bd. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1996
2 sentences

2008As an entirely separate ground for reversal, plaintiffs contend that the public notice of Crestwood's variance application was substantively deficient under Perlmart, supra, 295 N.J.Super. at 241 , 684 A. 2d 1005 , in failing to alert recipients sufficiently to the "nature of the matters to be considered" at the variance hearing.

2008As an entirely separate ground for reversal, plaintiffs contend that the public notice of Crestwood's variance application was substantively deficient under Perlmart, supra, 295 N.J.Super. at 241 , 684 A. 2d 1005 , in failing to alert recipients sufficiently to the "nature of the matters to be considered" at the variance hearing.

12008–2008
Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of Randolph green
nj · 1994
2 sentences

2000Pizzo Mantin Group, supra, 137 N.J. at 229 , 645 A. 2d 89 .

2000Pizzo Mantin Group, supra, 137 N.J. at 229 , 645 A. 2d 89 .

12000–2000
Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Board of Adjustment green
nj · 1994
2 sentences

1999Coventry Square, supra, 138 N.J. at 297 , 650 A. 2d 340 .

1999Coventry Square, supra, 138 N.J. at 297 , 650 A. 2d 340 .

11999–1999
VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMIT green
nj · 1952
2 sentences

1991Zahodiakin Eng'g Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, Summit, 8 N.J. 386 , 86 A. 2d 127 (1952), as authority for their position that the variance or exception is void and must be set aside.

1991Zahodiakin Eng'g Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, Summit, 8 N.J. 386 , 86 A. 2d 127 (1952), as authority for their position that the variance or exception is void and must be set aside.

11991–1991
DeFelice v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH green
njsuperctappdiv · 1987
1 sentence

1991DeFelice v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 216 N.J.

11991–1991
Gougeon v. Bd. of Adj. of Bor. of Stone Harbor green
nj · 1969
2 sentences

1984In Gougeon II the Court directed the issuance of a variance or exception for unique waterfront land in Stone Harbor: “Gougeon’s lot, which has been in his family for 33 years is irreplaceable.” 54 N.J. at 146 .

1984In Gougeon II the Court directed the issuance of a variance or exception for unique waterfront land in Stone Harbor: "Gougeon's lot, which has been in his family for 33 years is irreplaceable." 54 N.J. at 146 .

11984–1984
Amster v. Tenney neutral
njch · 1947
1 sentence

1975Paparone as constructive trustee also had at the very least a duty to pass on notice of the variance hearing to Tobin. [1] This is supported by the court's holding in Amster v. Tenney, 139 N.J.

11975–1975
Commonwealth v. Hall green
mass · 1867
1 sentence

1880Commonwealth v. Hall, 97 Mass. 570 .

11880–1880

Where else courts name it

TX 48 (1881–2023) PA 36 (1928–2026) RI 31 (1965–2026) NY 16 (1929–2024) TN 15 (1982–2022) AL 13 (1881–2016) CT 13 (1955–2022) CA 12 (1944–2021) MD 11 (1967–2025) NJ 10 (1880–2008) IL 9 (1906–2022) ME 7 (1982–2016) FL 6 (1962–1996) IA 6 (1933–2026) OR 6 (1979–2026) NH 6 (2004–2015) UT 5 (1987–2023) DC 5 (1979–2023) ID 5 (2018–2025) NC 5 (1981–2009) MA 4 (1985–2010) IN 4 (1979–1993) SC 3 (1967–2014) OK 3 (1915–1973) LA 3 (1967–1971) HI 2 (1998–2015) NM 2 (2011–2021) OH 2 (1946–2011) AZ 2 (1936–2017) GA 2 (1934–1978) MO 2 (1997–2015) KY 2 (1959–1974) AK 2 (2008–2020) MS 2 (1966–1975) MI 2 (1950–1962)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check