Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
York v. Town of Ogunquitgreen2 sentences2014Special Exception Maine law empowers boards of appeals in municipalities that have adopted zoning ordinances to grant variances, but they may do so only "in strict compliance" with statutory standards. 30-A M.R.S. § 4353(2)(C) (2013); see also York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 :ME 53, '![ 12, 769 A.2d 172 ("Zoning Ordinance provisions are specifically subject to the variance analysis mandated by state statute in 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4353(4)."). 2009See Lewis v. Town of Rockport, 2005 ME 44, ¶ 15 , 870 A.2d 107, 111 (implying in dicta acceptance of the parties’ contention that section 4353 is limited to the grant of variances from zoning ordinances); see also York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 ME 53, ¶ 12 , 769 A.2d 172, 177 (“Zoning Ordinance provisions are specifically subject to the variance analysis *911 mandated by” 30-A M.R.S. § 4353(4)). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Giffordgreen1 sentence2016We conclude that under the proper variance analysis, Lyon is not exposed to double jeopardy. [¶ 10] In State v. Gifford, we stated that “[a]n indictment will protect a defendant against further jeopardy if, read together with the evidence presented at trial and any parol evidence, it makes clear the offense for which the defendant has been placed on trial.” 595 A.2d 1049, 1052 (Me. 1991) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Town of Rockportgreen2 sentences2009See Lewis v. Town of Rockport, 2005 ME 44, ¶ 15 , 870 A.2d 107, 111 (implying in dicta acceptance of the parties’ contention that section 4353 is limited to the grant of variances from zoning ordinances); see also York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 ME 53, ¶ 12 , 769 A.2d 172, 177 (“Zoning Ordinance provisions are specifically subject to the variance analysis *911 mandated by” 30-A M.R.S. § 4353(4)). 2009See Lewis v. Town of Rockport, 2005 ME 44, ¶ 15 , 870 A.2d 107, 111 (implying in dicta acceptance of the parties’ contention that section 4353 is limited to the grant of variances from zoning ordinances); see also York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 ME 53, ¶ 12 , 769 A.2d 172, 177 (“Zoning Ordinance provisions are specifically subject to the variance analysis *911 mandated by” 30-A M.R.S. § 4353(4)). | 1 | 1 |
Ziehm v. Ziehmgreen1 sentence1982Accord: In the area of appeals from Planning Board action, see Bruk v. Town of Georgetown, Me., 436 A.2d 894, 897 (1981); in a child custody case, Ziehm v. Ziehm, Me., 433 A.2d 725, 730 (1981); in juvenile “criminal” justice proceedings, State v. Roy E. | 1 | 1 |
Bruk v. Town of Georgetowngreen1 sentence1982Accord: In the area of appeals from Planning Board action, see Bruk v. Town of Georgetown, Me., 436 A.2d 894, 897 (1981); in a child custody case, Ziehm v. Ziehm, Me., 433 A.2d 725, 730 (1981); in juvenile “criminal” justice proceedings, State v. Roy E. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Perkins v. Town of Ogunquit
green
2 sentences2008Perkins v. Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42 , <[ 12, 709 A.2d 106, 110 . 2008Perkins v. Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42 , <[ 12, 709 A.2d 106, 110 . | 2 | 2001–2008 |
Bishop v. Town of Eliot
neutral
1 sentence1995In Bishop v. Town of Eliot, 529 A.2d 798 (Me.1987), the consolidated appeal involved two adjacent “baeklots,” ie., lots situated behind other lots and having no street frontage. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.