Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Finger v. Stategreen2 sentences2021The majority correctly notes that our test for legal insanity is "specific and demanding," Majority Opinion at 4, which is exactly why this court has described insanity as "a term of art" and "stress [ed] the need for experts and juries to be correctly advised on the M'Naghten standard." Finger v. State, 117 Nev. 548, 577, 27 P.3d 66, 85 (2001). 2021The majority correctly notes that our test for legal insanity is "specific and demanding," Majority Opinion at 4, which is exactly why this court has described insanity as "a term of art" and "stress [ed] the need for experts and juries to be correctly advised on the M'Naghten standard." Finger v. State, 117 Nev. 548, 577, 27 P.3d 66, 85 (2001). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). | 1 | 5 |
Kuk v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). | 1 | 3 |
Bean v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. 1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. | 1 | 3 |
Criswell v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. 1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. | 1 | 2 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car 2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car | 1 | 1 |
DeChant v. Stategreen2 sentences2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car 2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car | 1 | 1 |
City of Las Vegas v. Walshgreen2 sentences2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car 2006The M’Naghten instruction in Miller properly did so, but the court’s other erroneous statements that there was no such thing as a “temporary insanity” defense, along with similar erroneous statements by the prosecution, undercut the instruction. 45 See DeChant v. State, 116 Nev. 918, 927 , 10 P.3d 108, 114 (2000) (stating that cumulative effect of errors at trial denied defendant a fair trial). 46 541 U.S. 36, 68 (2004). 47 120 Nev. 392, 399 , 91 P.3d 591, 595 (2004) (holding that a health care professional’s affidavit prepared pursuant to NRS 50.315(4) is admissible only if (1) the health car | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wheatongreen1 sentence2001Wyo. 1997) (stating “it is very questionable whether legal innocence because of insanity could constitute actual innocence”), aff’d, 127 F.3d 1110 (10th Cir. 1997). 135 See, e.g., Medlock, 887 P.2d at 1342 n.12; State v. Wheaton, 850 P.2d 507, 509 (Wash. 1993). 136 See Finger v. State, 117 Nev. 548, 556-57 , 27 P.3d 66, 72 (2001) (stating M’Naghten test for legal insanity followed in Nevada). 137 We have considered Pellegrini’s claims related to the adequacy of the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and his claims related to whether he was denied any rights by the procedu | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). | 1 | 1 |
Milne v. Shell Oil Co.green2 sentences2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sollars v. State
green
2 sentences2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 2001See Williams v. State, 85 Nev. 169 , 451 P.2d 848 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 916 , 90 S.Ct. 239 , 24 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). | 3 | 1968–2001 |
Fox v. State
green
2 sentences1996Fox, 73 Nev. at 242-43 , 316 P.2d at 925 . 1996Fox, 73 Nev. at 242-43 , 316 P.2d at 925 . | 2 | 1987–1996 |
Medlock v. State
green
1 sentence2001Wyo. 1997) (stating “it is very questionable whether legal innocence because of insanity could constitute actual innocence”), aff’d, 127 F.3d 1110 (10th Cir. 1997). 135 See, e.g., Medlock, 887 P.2d at 1342 n.12; State v. Wheaton, 850 P.2d 507, 509 (Wash. 1993). 136 See Finger v. State, 117 Nev. 548, 556-57 , 27 P.3d 66, 72 (2001) (stating M’Naghten test for legal insanity followed in Nevada). 137 We have considered Pellegrini’s claims related to the adequacy of the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and his claims related to whether he was denied any rights by the procedu | 1 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. John W. Hinckley, Jr. United States of America v. John W. Hinckley, Jr
green
2 sentences2001Hinckley would not have been able to assert his defense under the M'Naghten rule, but was successful in convincing a jury that he was legally insane under the lesser standards embodied by Durham that governed his trial. [2] United States v. Hinckley, 672 F.2d 115 (D.C.Cir.1982). 2001Hinckley would not have been able to assert his defense under the M'Naghten rule, but was successful in convincing a jury that he was legally insane under the lesser standards embodied by Durham that governed his trial. [2] United States v. Hinckley, 672 F.2d 115 (D.C.Cir.1982). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. Nathan J. (A Juvenile)
green
1 sentence2001Wyo. 1997) (stating “it is very questionable whether legal innocence because of insanity could constitute actual innocence”), aff’d, 127 F.3d 1110 (10th Cir. 1997). 135 See, e.g., Medlock, 887 P.2d at 1342 n.12; State v. Wheaton, 850 P.2d 507, 509 (Wash. 1993). 136 See Finger v. State, 117 Nev. 548, 556-57 , 27 P.3d 66, 72 (2001) (stating M’Naghten test for legal insanity followed in Nevada). 137 We have considered Pellegrini’s claims related to the adequacy of the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and his claims related to whether he was denied any rights by the procedu | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Hartley
green
2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. 1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Ford v. State
green
2 sentences1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. 1987Ford v. State, 102 Nev. 126 , 717 P.2d 27 (1986); Criswell v. State, 84 Nev. 459 , 443 P.2d 552 (1968); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); Fox v. State, 73 Nev. 241 , 316 P.2d 924 (1957); State v. Hartley, 22 Nev. 342 , 40 Pac. 372 (1895); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 22 P. 241 (1889). 4 The decision of whether the attorney-client privilege may include a communication to a non-lawyer by the lawyer’s client contemplates two conflicting forces. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Mears v. State
green
2 sentences1968Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3 , 422 P.2d 230 (1967); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, supra; Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 11 P. 241 (1889). 1968Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3 , 422 P.2d 230 (1967); Bean v. State, 81 Nev. 25 , 398 P.2d 251 (1965); Kuk v. State, supra; Sollars v. State, 73 Nev. 248 , 316 P.2d 917 (1957); State v. Lewis, 20 Nev. 333 , 11 P. 241 (1889). | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.