exhaustive analysis (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

exhaustive analysis in Oklahoma

10 Oklahoma opinions name it 4 courts 1921–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
William B. Tanner Co. v. Estate of Fesslergreen
wis · 1981 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See In re Estate of Fessler, 100 Wis.2d 437 , 302 N.W.2d 414 (1981); Gano Farms, Inc. v. Estate of Kleweno, 2 Kan.

1986See In re Estate of Fessler, 100 Wis.2d 437 , 302 N.W.2d 414 (1981); Gano Farms, Inc. v. Estate of Kleweno, 2 Kan.

11
Berryman v. Stategreen
oklacrimapp · 1955 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1969–1969
1 sentence

1969See, also, Berryman v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 283 P.2d 558 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 ; Jordan v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 307 , 245 P.2d 748 .” *387 The case of In re McNaught, supra, which was cited in the Sisson case, supra, is indeed an exhaustive analysis of the same question presented here.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Robinson v. Ragen neutral
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U. S. 749 , 67 S. Ct. 76 , 91 L.

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U.S. 749 , 67 S.Ct. 76 , 91 L.Ed. 646 , the United States Supreme Court denied McKay's petition for writ of certiorari.

21952–1952
McKay v. Nevada green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U. S. 749 , 67 S. Ct. 76 , 91 L.

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U.S. 749 , 67 S.Ct. 76 , 91 L.Ed. 646 , the United States Supreme Court denied McKay's petition for writ of certiorari.

21952–1952
Ferguson v. Ragen neutral
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U. S. 749 , 67 S. Ct. 76 , 91 L.

1952In McKay v. Nevada, 1946, 329 U.S. 749 , 67 S.Ct. 76 , 91 L.Ed. 646 , the United States Supreme Court denied McKay's petition for writ of certiorari.

21952–1952
Witherspoon v. Illinois green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

2013Witherspoon, 391 U.S. at 522 , 88 S.Ct. at 1777 . 1 T2 The Court's exhaustive analysis of the trial court's voir dire and subsequent exclusion of several jurors opens with a critical concession that the trial court did not exclude any juror in violation of Witherspoon or the Eighth Amendment.

2013Witherspoon, 391 U.S. at 522 , 88 S.Ct. at 1777 . 1 T2 The Court's exhaustive analysis of the trial court's voir dire and subsequent exclusion of several jurors opens with a critical concession that the trial court did not exclude any juror in violation of Witherspoon or the Eighth Amendment.

12013–2013
In Re Sundance Corporation, Inc. green
waeb · 1993
1 sentence

1998Further, state judicial immunity protects not only a state when invoking its judicial function but also the court’s officers such as a receiver acting under the authority of judicial orders. 149 B.R. at 658 . 3 We have likewise reviewed the language in CERCLA and agree with the Sundance Court: Congressional intent to abrogate a receiver’s judicial immunity from suit is not made “unmistakably clear in the language of the statute.” Accordingly, we find Receiver protected by judicial immunity. ¶ 11 We consequently find the trial court’s order denying Sun/Texaco’s application to join receiver, and

11998–1998
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police green
scotus · 1989
2 sentences

1997Will, 491 U.S. at 71 , 109 S.Ct. at 2312 .

1997Will, 491 U.S. at 71 , 109 S.Ct. at 2312 .

11997–1997
In Re Equal Employment Opportunity Commission green
ca8 · 1984
1 sentence

1997The court noted that "[e]mployers are entitled to substantial discretion in judging the reasonableness of safety-related job qualifications." Id. at 450 , citing Tamiami Trail Tours, 531 F.2d at 236 n. 30. ¶ 13 The court then reviewed the evidence in the trial record which included an exhaustive analysis of the duties of a highway patrolman and the physical requirements necessary to perform those duties safely, both for the patrolman and the public.

11997–1997
cluster 333790 green
ca5 · 1976
1 sentence

1997The court noted that "[e]mployers are entitled to substantial discretion in judging the reasonableness of safety-related job qualifications." Id. at 450 , citing Tamiami Trail Tours, 531 F.2d at 236 n. 30. ¶ 13 The court then reviewed the evidence in the trial record which included an exhaustive analysis of the duties of a highway patrolman and the physical requirements necessary to perform those duties safely, both for the patrolman and the public.

11997–1997
Gano Farms, Inc. v. Estate of Kleweno neutral
kanctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1986See In re Estate of Fessler, 100 Wis.2d 437 , 302 N.W.2d 414 (1981); Gano Farms, Inc. v. Estate of Kleweno, 2 Kan.

1986See In re Estate of Fessler, 100 Wis.2d 437 , 302 N.W.2d 414 (1981); Gano Farms, Inc. v. Estate of Kleweno, 2 Kan.App.2d 506 , 582 P.2d 742 (Kan.App.1978).

11986–1986
Jordan v. Turner neutral
oklacrimapp · 1952
2 sentences

1969See, also, Berryman v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 283 P.2d 558 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 ; Jordan v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 307 , 245 P.2d 748 .” *387 The case of In re McNaught, supra, which was cited in the Sisson case, supra, is indeed an exhaustive analysis of the same question presented here.

1969See, also, Berryman v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 283 P.2d 558 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 ; Jordan v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 307 , 245 P.2d 748 .” *387 The case of In re McNaught, supra, which was cited in the Sisson case, supra, is indeed an exhaustive analysis of the same question presented here.

11969–1969
Pierro v. Turner green
oklacrimapp · 1952
2 sentences

1969See, also, Berryman v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 283 P.2d 558 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 ; Jordan v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 307 , 245 P.2d 748 .” *387 The case of In re McNaught, supra, which was cited in the Sisson case, supra, is indeed an exhaustive analysis of the same question presented here.

1969See, also, Berryman v. State, Okl.Cr.App., 283 P.2d 558 ; Pierro v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 425 , 247 P.2d 291 ; Jordan v. Turner, 95 Okl.Cr. 307 , 245 P.2d 748 .” *387 The case of In re McNaught, supra, which was cited in the Sisson case, supra, is indeed an exhaustive analysis of the same question presented here.

11969–1969
City of Shawnee v. Cheek green
okla · 1913
2 sentences

1938An exhaustive analysis of the doctrine as adopted in this state appears in City of Shawnee v. Cheek (1913) 41 Okla. 227 , 137 P. 724 .

1938An exhaustive analysis of the doctrine as adopted in this state appears in City of Shawnee v. Cheek (1913) 41 Okla. 227 , 137 P. 724 .

11938–1938
Horn v. State neutral
oklacrimapp · 1917
2 sentences

1921Quite an exhaustive analysis of this subject may bje found in the case of Horn v. State, 13 Okla.

1921Cr. 354 , 164 Pac. 683 .

11921–1921

Where else courts name it

CA 68 (1929–2025) RI 47 (1972–2016) TX 36 (1914–2017) PA 23 (1946–2025) AR 21 (1926–2026) NY 20 (1888–2025) IL 19 (1944–2025) LA 15 (1952–2026) MD 14 (1972–2025) OH 13 (1996–2024) MO 11 (1942–1996) OK 10 (1921–2013) MI 10 (1918–1996) MT 9 (1926–2009) MA 9 (1961–2013) NJ 7 (1935–2010) FL 7 (1915–2005) CT 7 (1979–2016) KS 7 (1975–2024) ID 7 (1963–2008) NV 6 (1938–2017) TN 6 (1972–2018) AZ 6 (1928–2017) WA 6 (1935–2023) AL 6 (1909–2013) VA 5 (1969–2010) WY 5 (1974–1986) WI 5 (1981–2025) OR 5 (1959–1997) SC 4 (1995–2019) IN 4 (1958–1985) NM 4 (2009–2014) DC 4 (1970–2022) CO 4 (1963–1997) IA 3 (1953–1983) NC 3 (1961–2008) WV 2 (1979–2012) MN 2 (1954–1968) DE 2 (1991–2023) SD 2 (1982–1992) UT 2 (1964–1993) KY 2 (1928–2020) NE 2 (1964–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check