Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hansen
green
1 sentence2017That precedent instructs that we should seek “to harmonize, whenever possible, related statutory and rule provisions.” Metzler, 235 Ariz. at 144 -45 ¶ 13; State v. Hansen, 215 Ariz. 287 , 289 ¶ 7 (2007). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017That precedent instructs that we should seek “to harmonize, whenever possible, related statutory and rule provisions.” Metzler, 235 Ariz. at 144 -45 ¶ 13; State v. Hansen, 215 Ariz. 287 , 289 ¶ 7 (2007). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
United States v. Winston Bryant McConney
green
1 sentence1993An exhaustive analysis of the subject in general is found in United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
green
1 sentence1993An exhaustive analysis of the subject in general is found in United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Turner Advertising Co. v. Garcia
green
1 sentence1993An exhaustive analysis of the subject in general is found in United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993An exhaustive analysis of the subject in general is found in United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
green
2 sentences1990Id. at 106 , 745 P.2d at 164 . 1990Id. at 106 , 745 P.2d at 164 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Murphy v. State
green
2 sentences1982For an exhaustive analysis of the history of the Enabling Act, see Murphy v. State, 65 Ariz. 338 , 181 P.2d 336 (1947). 4 . 1982For an exhaustive analysis of the history of the Enabling Act, see Murphy v. State, 65 Ariz. 338 , 181 P.2d 336 (1947). 4 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Commercial Union Insurance v. Burt Thomas-Aitken Construction Co.
green
1 sentence1969As the New Jersey Supreme Court stated: “We add that the private employer of a notary public might be liable for the notary’s breach of duty if the employer participated in that breach, as for example if the employer should ask or encourage the notary to act without appropriate inquiry.” 230 A.2d, at 501 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Home State Bank v. Swartz
neutral
2 sentences1928“The history of the phrase as it appears in our statute, with particular reference to the mischievous word ‘direct’ (the elimination of which from the statute would be beneficial, as it seems to'function chiefly as a trouble maker) is covered fully in the Sparrow Case, supra. In that case, after an exhaustive analysis of the authorities then available (and upon this point no new light appears), this court concluded that contracts contemplated by our statute as it then existed- — and it is the same now — ‘are such only as require the payment unconditionally and absolutely of a definite sum.’ ” 1928“The history of the phrase as it appears in our statute, with particular reference to the mischievous word ‘direct’ (the elimination of which from the statute would be beneficial, as it seems to'function chiefly as a trouble maker) is covered fully in the Sparrow Case, supra. In that case, after an exhaustive analysis of the authorities then available (and upon this point no new light appears), this court concluded that contracts contemplated by our statute as it then existed- — and it is the same now — ‘are such only as require the payment unconditionally and absolutely of a definite sum.’ ” | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.