Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mendillo v. Board of Educationred2 sentences2016In Campos v. Coleman, supra, 319 Conn. at 57, 123 A.3d 854 , this court overruled Mendillo v. Board of Education, supra, 246 Conn. at 456, 461 , 477-96 , 717 A.2d 1177 , in which the court had declined, based on an exhaustive analysis of the relevant policy principles and applicable precedent, to recognize a derivative cause of action for loss of consortium by a minor child. 2016In Campos v. Coleman, supra, 319 Conn. at 57, 123 A.3d 854 , this court overruled Mendillo v. Board of Education, supra, 246 Conn. at 456, 461 , 477-96 , 717 A.2d 1177 , in which the court had declined, based on an exhaustive analysis of the relevant policy principles and applicable precedent, to recognize a derivative cause of action for loss of consortium by a minor child. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Geislergreen2 sentences1995Here, the defendant has presented an exhaustive analysis, employing the criteria enunciated by our Supreme Court in State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992), as to why our state constitution affords greater protection than the federal constitution in the context of double jeopardy. 1995Here, the defendant has presented an exhaustive analysis, employing the criteria enunciated by our Supreme Court in State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992), as to why our state constitution affords greater protection than the federal constitution in the context of double jeopardy. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2002However, in coming to this decision, Justice Katz undertook an exhaustive analysis of the evolution of modern products liability law beginning with Justice Cardozo's landmark case of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co ., 217 N.Y. 382 , 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) and continuing through with the development of Connecticut's products liability law. 2002However, in coming to this decision, Justice Katz undertook an exhaustive analysis of the evolution of modern products liability law beginning with Justice Cardozo's landmark case of MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co ., 217 N.Y. 382 , 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) and continuing through with the development of Connecticut's products liability law. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lake Williams Beach Ass'n v. Gilman Bros.
neutral
2 sentences2000Co. , Superior Court, Judicial District of New London, Docket No. 065159 (December 29, 1982, Purtill, J.), 197 Conn. 134 , 496 A.2d 182 (1985). 2000Co. , Superior Court, Judicial District of New London, Docket No. 065159 (December 29, 1982, Purtill, J.), 197 Conn. 134 , 496 A.2d 182 (1985). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Shelton
green
2 sentences1979In People v. Shelton, 88 Misc. 2d 136, 149 , 385 N.Y.S.2d 708 (1976), Justice Bentley Kassal made an exhaustive analysis of the affirmative defense in question. 1979In People v. Shelton, 88 Misc. 2d 136, 149 , 385 N.Y.S.2d 708 (1976), Justice Bentley Kassal made an exhaustive analysis of the affirmative defense in question. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.