Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Durstgreen2 sentences1995As such, it is necessary that a defendant asserting a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel make an offer of proof “alleging sufficient facts upon which a reviewing court can conclude that counsel may have, in fact, been ineffective.” Commonwealth v. Durst, 522 Pa. 2, 5 , 559 A.2d 504, 505 (1989). 1995As such, it is necessary that a defendant asserting a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel make an offer of proof “alleging sufficient facts upon which a reviewing court can conclude that counsel may have, in fact, been ineffective.” Commonwealth v. Durst, 522 Pa. 2, 5 , 559 A.2d 504, 505 (1989). | 3 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Pettusgreen2 sentences1994See also: Commonwealth v. Stanley, 534 Pa. 297, 299-300 , 632 A.2d 871, 872 (1993); Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). 1994See also: Commonwealth v. Stanley, 534 Pa. 297, 299-300 , 632 A.2d 871, 872 (1993); Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). | 2 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2019Com. v. Jones, 651 A.2d 1101, 1109 (Pa. 1994). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Watkinsgreen1 sentence2015Commonwealth v. Watkins, 108 A.3d 692, 702 (Pa. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1995“In order for appellant to prevail on a claim of ineffectiveness he must demonstrate that: (1) the underlying claim is of arguable merit; (2) the particular course chosen by counsel did not have some reasonable basis designed to effectuate his interests; and (3) counsel’s ineffectiveness prejudiced him.” Commonwealth v. Williams, 532 Pa. 265, 274 , 615 A.2d 716, 720 (1992). 1995“In order for appellant to prevail on a claim of ineffectiveness he must demonstrate that: (1) the underlying claim is of arguable merit; (2) the particular course chosen by counsel did not have some reasonable basis designed to effectuate his interests; and (3) counsel’s ineffectiveness prejudiced him.” Commonwealth v. Williams, 532 Pa. 265, 274 , 615 A.2d 716, 720 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Stanleygreen2 sentences1994See also: Commonwealth v. Stanley, 534 Pa. 297, 299-300 , 632 A.2d 871, 872 (1993); Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). 1994See also: Commonwealth v. Stanley, 534 Pa. 297, 299-300 , 632 A.2d 871, 872 (1993); Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d 1332, 1335 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Petrasgreen2 sentences1994See also: Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d *530 1332, 1335 (1981); Commonwealth v. Petras, 368 Pa.Super. 372, 377 , 534 A.2d 483, 485 (1987). 1994See also: Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 563 , 424 A.2d *530 1332, 1335 (1981); Commonwealth v. Petras, 368 Pa.Super. 372, 377 , 534 A.2d 483, 485 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. McArthurgreen1 sentence1977People v. Taylor, 12 Cal.3d 686, 117 Cal.Rptr. 170 , 527 P.2d 622 (1974); United States v. Bruno, 333 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1971); see United States v. McArthur, 419 F.Supp. 186 (D.N.D.1976) (dicta). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
green
2 sentences2020A defendant asserting such a claim must also prove that “but for counsel’s deficient failure to consult with him about an appeal, he would have timely appealed.” Id. (quoting Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. at 484 ). 2020A defendant asserting such a claim must also prove that “but for counsel’s deficient failure to consult with him about an appeal, he would have timely appealed.” Id. (quoting Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. at 484 ). | 3 | 2011–2020 |
Commonwealth v. Donaghy
green
1 sentence2017Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214 , 736 A.2d 564 (1999)). -4- J-S19036-17 Second, if the defendant did not clearly articulate to counsel whether he wished to file an appeal, the defendant asserting a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is entitled to the reinstatement of his appellate rights if he can show “(1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defendant.” Id. (quoting Roe v. Flores–Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477 , 120 S.Ct. 1029, 1034 , 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Commonwealth v. Lantzy
green
2 sentences2017Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214 , 736 A.2d 564 (1999)). -4- J-S19036-17 Second, if the defendant did not clearly articulate to counsel whether he wished to file an appeal, the defendant asserting a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is entitled to the reinstatement of his appellate rights if he can show “(1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defendant.” Id. (quoting Roe v. Flores–Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477 , 120 S.Ct. 1029, 1034 , 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000)). 2017Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 558 Pa. 214 , 736 A.2d 564 (1999)). -4- J-S19036-17 Second, if the defendant did not clearly articulate to counsel whether he wished to file an appeal, the defendant asserting a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel is entitled to the reinstatement of his appellate rights if he can show “(1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) counsel's deficient performance prejudiced the defendant.” Id. (quoting Roe v. Flores–Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477 , 120 S.Ct. 1029, 1034 , 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Taylor
red
2 sentences1977People v. Taylor, 12 Cal.3d 686, 117 Cal.Rptr. 170 , 527 P.2d 622 (1974); United States v. Bruno, 333 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1971); see United States v. McArthur, 419 F.Supp. 186 (D.N.D.1976) (dicta). 1977People v. Taylor, 12 Cal.3d 686, 117 Cal.Rptr. 170 , 527 P.2d 622 (1974); United States v. Bruno, 333 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1971); see United States v. McArthur, 419 F.Supp. 186 (D.N.D.1976) (dicta). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
United States v. Bruno
green
1 sentence1977People v. Taylor, 12 Cal.3d 686, 117 Cal.Rptr. 170 , 527 P.2d 622 (1974); United States v. Bruno, 333 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1971); see United States v. McArthur, 419 F.Supp. 186 (D.N.D.1976) (dicta). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.