Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1943–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blum v. Laniergreen1 sentence2025Sch. at Hous. v. Than, 901 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Tex. 1995) (holding that statutory entitlements create interests protected by due process); Blum v. Lanier, 997 S.W.2d 259, 262 (Tex. 1999) (recognizing the statutory right to challenge election measures as a valuable voter remedy). | 1 | 1 |
University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. Thangreen1 sentence2025Sch. at Hous. v. Than, 901 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Tex. 1995) (holding that statutory entitlements create interests protected by due process); Blum v. Lanier, 997 S.W.2d 259, 262 (Tex. 1999) (recognizing the statutory right to challenge election measures as a valuable voter remedy). | 1 | 1 |
The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. Heinrichgreen1 sentence2021See id. (“[I]t is clear that suits to require state officials to comply with statutory or constitutional provisions are not prohibited by sovereign immunity.”). | 1 | 1 |
Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vista Community Medical Center, LLPgreen1 sentence2010As we explained, because fee guidelines were never intended to be an entitlement, “even if the Commission had promulgated fee guidelines, the provider would not have a statutory right or privilege to be paid the amount set out in the guideline.” Id.8 Vista’s argument here, while set out in constitutional terms, is essentially 8 Vista also cites this Court’s decision in Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vista Community Medical Center, 275 S.W.3d 538, 554 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, pet. filed). | 1 | 1 |
Collier v. Poegreen1 sentence1990See also Collier v. Poe, 732 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) wherein the Court of Criminal Appeals concluded “It is well established that failure to grant a mandatory legislative continuance will result in automatic reversal ...” (citations omitted). 732 at 345-46. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. East Side Surgical Center
green
2 sentences2010Of note here, we explained that “even if the Commission had promulgated fee guidelines, the provider would not have a statutory right or privilege to be paid the amount set out in the guideline.” Id. 2010As we explained, because fee guidelines were never intended to be an entitlement, “even if the Commission had promulgated fee guidelines, the provider would not have a statutory right or privilege to be paid the amount set out in the guideline.” Id. 8 Vista’s argument here, *275 while set out in constitutional terms, is essentially the same complaint raised in East Side. | 3 | 2010–2010 |
Richard Patrick Feemster, Sr. v. Bj-Titan Services Co./titan Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018Feemster observed that the categories of potential public-policy exceptions to permit a wrongful-discharge claim despite the default rule of at-will employment include: "(1) refusal to commit an unlawful act, (2) performance of an important public obligation, or (3) exercise of a statutory right or privilege." Id. (citing Note, Protecting Employees at Will Against Wrongful Discharge: The Public Policy Exception , 96 HARV. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lozoya v. Air Systems Components, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012Lozoya, 81 S.W.3d at 348-49 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Government Services Insurance Underwriters v. Jones
green
1 sentence1990Underwriters. v. Jones, 368 S.W.2d 560 (Tex.1963) wherein the Texas Supreme Court states “The statutory right or privilege of the legisla-tor_” (emphasis ours). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
McLeod v. Harris
green
1 sentence1985McLeod v. Harris, supra says it may not be denied. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes
green
1 sentence1943If such a suit can be maintained, similar suits by innumerable persons are likewise admissible to determine whether money ■ is being loaned without lawful authority for uses, which, although hurtful to the complainants, are perfectly lawful.- The supposition opens a vista of litigation hitherto unrevealed.” [ 302 U.S. 464 , 58 S.Ct. 304 , 8L.Ed. 374.] The same distinction is implicit in the English case, above, where it was held that the complaining motor carrier could not question the power of a competing carrier under its charter to engage in the business, although it had the statutory right | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.