Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1954–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Graves & Parham v. State
green
2 sentences1987Graves & Parham v. State, 236 Ark. 936 , 370 S.W.2d 806 (1963). 1987Graves & Parham v. State, 236 Ark. 936 , 370 S.W.2d 806 (1963). | 4 | 1981–1987 |
Cassell v. State
green
2 sentences1996Cassell, 273 Ark. at 62 , 616 S.W.2d at 486-87 . 1996Cassell, 273 Ark. at 62 , 616 S.W.2d at 486-87 . | 2 | 1986–1996 |
Camden Transit Company v. Owen
neutral
2 sentences1969A hearing has been held, and the Commission which held the hearing has had the advantage of seeing and hearing the parties and witnesses face to face, whereas the Circuit Court and this Court review the evidence from the record only. ‘Where a matter is heard and decided by an administrative body such as the Public Service Commission, an order made by it should be upheld by the court on appeal unless it is against the weight of the evidence.’ Camden Transit Co. v. Owen, 209 Ark. 861 , 192 S.W. 2d 757, 758 .” Apparently the trial court did err in applying the substantial evidence rule in the cas 1969A hearing has been held, and the Commission which held the hearing has had the advantage of seeing and hearing the parties and witnesses face to face, whereas the Circuit Court and this Court review the evidence from the record only. ‘Where a matter is heard and decided by an administrative body such as the Public Service Commission, an order made by it should be upheld by the court on appeal unless it is against the weight of the evidence.’ Camden Transit Co. v. Owen, 209 Ark. 861 , 192 S.W. 2d 757, 758 .” Apparently the trial court did err in applying the substantial evidence rule in the cas | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Koury v. Koury
neutral
2 sentences1961“We have also held that while Chancery cases are tried de novo, the established rule of practice is that his findings are of such persuasive force upon evenly balanced testimony that the decree will not be reversed.” And in Koury v. Koury, 230 Ark. 536 , 323 S. W. 2d 554 : “The very nature of the ill treatment inflicted upon Mrs. Koury was such that there could not be much corroboration, and in a case of this kind where there is no collusion her testimony does not need much corroboration. ’ ’ Applying these rules here there was more than sufficient evidence to support the Chancellor’s finding. 1961“We have also held that while Chancery cases are tried de novo, the established rule of practice is that his findings are of such persuasive force upon evenly balanced testimony that the decree will not be reversed.” And in Koury v. Koury, 230 Ark. 536 , 323 S. W. 2d 554 : “The very nature of the ill treatment inflicted upon Mrs. Koury was such that there could not be much corroboration, and in a case of this kind where there is no collusion her testimony does not need much corroboration. ’ ’ Applying these rules here there was more than sufficient evidence to support the Chancellor’s finding. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Coffey v. Coffey
green
2 sentences1961As was said in Coffee v. Coffee, 223 Ark. 607 , 267 S. W. 2d 499 : “The Chancellor and the parties reside in the same community and he had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify and was in a preferred position to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded this testimony. 1961As was said in Coffee v. Coffee, 223 Ark. 607 , 267 S. W. 2d 499 : “The Chancellor and the parties reside in the same community and he had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses testify and was in a preferred position to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded this testimony. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Hill v. Barnard
green
2 sentences1954Hill v. Barnard, 216 Ark. 29 , 224 S. W. 2d 31 . 1954Hill v. Barnard, 216 Ark. 29 , 224 S. W. 2d 31 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.