almost universal rule (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

almost universal rule in Georgia

9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1906–1977 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Griffin v. Hendersongreen
ga · 1903 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1967–1969
2 sentences

1967It must appear that the excluded testimony was material; and the almost universal rule of practice is that what that material testimony was must be expressly called to the attention of the trial court at the time of its exclusion.” Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382, 383 ( 43 SE 712 ).

1967It must appear that the excluded testimony was material; and the almost universal rule of practice is that what that material testimony was must be expressly called to the attention of the trial court at the time of its exclusion.” Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382, 383 ( 43 SE 712 ).

22
Mahone v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1969 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977It must appear that the excluded testimony was material, and the almost universal rule of practice is that what that material testimony was must be expressly called to the attention of the trial court at the time of its exclusion.” Mahone v. State, 120 Ga. App. 234, 235 ( 170 SE2d 48 ) (1969). 5.

1977It must appear that the excluded testimony was material, and the almost universal rule of practice is that what that material testimony was must be expressly called to the attention of the trial court at the time of its exclusion.” Mahone v. State, 120 Ga. App. 234, 235 ( 170 SE2d 48 ) (1969). 5.

11
Ray Ex Rel. Gudger v. Raygreen
nc · 1941 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See 10 AmJur2d 869, Bastards, § 33, nn. 11 & 12, and see Annotations, 60 ALR 381 , 68 ALR 421 , 89 ALR 912 , 4 ALR2d 567, and Ray v. Ray, 219 N. C. 217 ( 13 SE2d 224 ).

1966See 10 AmJur2d 869, Bastards, § 33, nn. 11 & 12, and see Annotations, 60 ALR 381 , 68 ALR 421 , 89 ALR 912 , 4 ALR2d 567, and Ray v. Ray, 219 N. C. 217 ( 13 SE2d 224 ).

11
Bennett v. City of Mariongreen
iowa · 1897 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1914–1914
2 sentences

1914See Bennett v. City of Marion, 102 Iowa, 425 ( 71 N. W. 360 , 63 Am.

1914See Bennett v. City of Marion, 102 Iowa, 425 ( 71 N. W. 360 , 63 Am.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Woodside neutral
mass · 1870
1 sentence

1947Rep. 174 ; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251 ; People v. Bruzzo, 24 Cal. 41 ; United *786 States v. Ford, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L. ed. 399; Lindsay v. People, 63 N. Y. 143 ; Commonwealth v. Woodside, 105 Mass. 594 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 .” Thus that tribunal in a well considered, clearly stated, and learned opinion expressed the almost universal rule which prevails throughout this country on the question now under consideration.

11947–1947
Bigby v. Warnock green
ga · 1902
1 sentence

1947Bigby v. Warnock, 115 Ga. 386 (4) [ 41 S. E. 622 , 57 L.

11947–1947
United States v. Ford green
scotus · 1879
1 sentence

1947Rep. 174 ; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251 ; People v. Bruzzo, 24 Cal. 41 ; United *786 States v. Ford, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L. ed. 399; Lindsay v. People, 63 N. Y. 143 ; Commonwealth v. Woodside, 105 Mass. 594 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 .” Thus that tribunal in a well considered, clearly stated, and learned opinion expressed the almost universal rule which prevails throughout this country on the question now under consideration.

11947–1947
Linsday v. . People of the State of N.Y. green
ny · 1875
1 sentence

1947Rep. 174 ; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251 ; People v. Bruzzo, 24 Cal. 41 ; United *786 States v. Ford, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L. ed. 399; Lindsay v. People, 63 N. Y. 143 ; Commonwealth v. Woodside, 105 Mass. 594 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 .” Thus that tribunal in a well considered, clearly stated, and learned opinion expressed the almost universal rule which prevails throughout this country on the question now under consideration.

11947–1947
Wight v. Rindshopf green
wis · 1877
1 sentence

1947Rep. 174 ; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251 ; People v. Bruzzo, 24 Cal. 41 ; United *786 States v. Ford, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L. ed. 399; Lindsay v. People, 63 N. Y. 143 ; Commonwealth v. Woodside, 105 Mass. 594 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 .” Thus that tribunal in a well considered, clearly stated, and learned opinion expressed the almost universal rule which prevails throughout this country on the question now under consideration.

11947–1947
People v. Bruzzo neutral
cal · 1864
1 sentence

1947Rep. 174 ; People v. Peter, 48 Cal. 251 ; People v. Bruzzo, 24 Cal. 41 ; United *786 States v. Ford, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L. ed. 399; Lindsay v. People, 63 N. Y. 143 ; Commonwealth v. Woodside, 105 Mass. 594 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 .” Thus that tribunal in a well considered, clearly stated, and learned opinion expressed the almost universal rule which prevails throughout this country on the question now under consideration.

11947–1947
Jordan & Phillips v. Dixie Culvert & Metal Co. neutral
ga · 1916
1 sentence

1936The case of Luden v. Enterprise Co., 146 Ga. 284 ( 91 S. E. 102 , L.

11936–1936
Luden v. Enterprise Lumber Co. neutral
ga · 1916
1 sentence

1936The case of Luden v. Enterprise Co., 146 Ga. 284 ( 91 S. E. 102 , L.

11936–1936
Bullard v. Brewer green
ga · 1903
1 sentence

1906Bullard v. Brewer, 118 Ga. 918 .

11906–1906

Where else courts name it

FL 19 (1938–2026) KY 17 (1927–2020) IA 15 (1874–2015) AZ 15 (1920–2025) WY 14 (1941–2012) CA 12 (1939–2019) ID 11 (1915–1999) WA 10 (1896–2022) WV 9 (1978–2020) GA 9 (1906–1977) NC 9 (1892–2006) NY 9 (1900–1973) NE 9 (1929–2021) MN 8 (1967–2015) IL 8 (1905–1984) OH 8 (1894–2015) TN 7 (1909–2020) MS 7 (1909–1978) OK 6 (1919–1997) IN 6 (1929–1972) CT 5 (1897–2001) NM 5 (1940–1970) SC 5 (1897–2004) NJ 5 (1952–1961) PA 5 (1867–2002) MD 4 (1944–2015) OR 4 (1972–1997) MO 4 (1913–1949) DE 4 (1952–2001) SD 4 (1942–2022) AR 4 (1894–2012) KS 4 (1939–2015) AL 3 (1915–1971) NH 3 (1908–2005) TX 3 (1960–2026) WI 2 (1893–1974) HI 2 (1927–1939) CO 2 (1964–1974) AK 2 (1964–2000) MT 2 (1949–1952) MA 2 (1990–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check