Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shapiro v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga. App. 620, 622 (3) ( 504 SE2d 719 ) (1998) (DPS records “are public records which allow a court to ‘infer reliability when the hearsay falls within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, such as the public records exception.’ Price [v. State, 269 Ga. 222, 223 ( 498 SE2d 262 ) (1998)].”). 2011Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga. App. 620, 622 (3) ( 504 SE2d 719 ) (1998) (DPS records “are public records which allow a court to ‘infer reliability when the hearsay falls within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, such as the public records exception.’ Price [v. State, 269 Ga. 222, 223 ( 498 SE2d 262 ) (1998)].”). | 2 | 2 |
Price v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga. App. 620, 622 (3) ( 504 SE2d 719 ) (1998) (DPS records “are public records which allow a court to ‘infer reliability when the hearsay falls within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, such as the public records exception.’ Price [v. State, 269 Ga. 222, 223 ( 498 SE2d 262 ) (1998)].”). 2011Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga. App. 620, 622 (3) ( 504 SE2d 719 ) (1998) (DPS records “are public records which allow a court to ‘infer reliability when the hearsay falls within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, such as the public records exception.’ Price [v. State, 269 Ga. 222, 223 ( 498 SE2d 262 ) (1998)].”). | 2 | 2 |
Barksdale v. Stategreen2 sentences2003"Even if a hearsay declarant is not subject to cross-examination at trial, the admission of the declarant's out-of-court statement does not violate the defendant's right of confrontation if the declarant's out-of-court statement meets the requirements of a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule...." Barksdale v. State, supra at 13(2)(b), 453 S.E.2d 2 . 2. 2003Barksdale v. State, supra at 13(2)(b), 453 S.E.2d 2 . | 1 | 2 |
Livingston v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Id. 1998Because the use of hearsay is “at odds with the literal terms of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment,” its admission is strictly limited to circumstances “meet[ing] the requirements of a firmly-rooted exception to the hearsay rule.” Livingston, 268 Ga. at 210 (2). | 1 | 2 |
Idaho v. Wrightgreen2 sentences1996Should the hearsay evidence not fall within a firmly rooted exception to the rule against the *854 admission of hearsay, it may nevertheless survive Confrontation Clause scrutiny for reliability “ ‘if it is supported by a “showing of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” ’ ” Id. 1996While the analyst’s certificate is presumptively unreliable and inadmissible for Confrontation Clause purposes since it does not fall within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule (Idaho v. Wright, supra, 497 U. S. at 817 ), that defect can be cured, for purposes of the Confrontation Clause, by a showing by the hearsay proponent of the “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” drawn from the totality of circumstances surrounding the making of the hearsay. | 1 | 2 |
DeLoach v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Nelson v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Buggay v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brodiegreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Keller v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Salahuddin v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
In Interest of Cwgreen2 sentences2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi 2004See also Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 , 571 S.E.2d 806 (2002). [2] See In the Interest of C.W., 227 Ga.App. 763, 767-768 (3), 490 S.E.2d 442 (1997). [3] Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 856 , 472 S.E.2d 74 (1996) (unconstitutional to introduce a sworn affidavit into evidence against a criminal defendant, in contravention of the defendant's constitutional guaranty that he be confronted with the witnesses against him). [4] Shapiro v. State, 233 Ga.App. 620, 622 (3), 504 S.E.2d 719 (1998) (DPS records at issue "are public records which allow a court to `infer reliability when the hearsay falls withi | 1 | 1 |
Gill v. Bowmangreen2 sentences1998See also Gill v. Bowman, 201 Ga. App. 308 ( 410 SE2d 780 ) (1991); Love v. Hardison, 166 Ga. App. 677 ( 305 SE2d 420 ) (1983). 1998See also Gill v. Bowman, 201 Ga. App. 308 ( 410 SE2d 780 ) (1991); Love v. Hardison, 166 Ga. App. 677 ( 305 SE2d 420 ) (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Higgs v. Stategreen2 sentences1996See Higgs v. State, 256 Ga. 606, 609 ( 351 SE2d 448 ) (1987); Barnett v. State, 211 Ga. App. 651, 652 ( 440 SE2d 247 ) (1994). 1996See Higgs v. State, 256 Ga. 606, 609 ( 351 SE2d 448 ) (1987); Barnett v. State, 211 Ga. App. 651, 652 ( 440 SE2d 247 ) (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Barnett v. Stategreen2 sentences1996See Higgs v. State, 256 Ga. 606, 609 ( 351 SE2d 448 ) (1987); Barnett v. State, 211 Ga. App. 651, 652 ( 440 SE2d 247 ) (1994). 1996See Higgs v. State, 256 Ga. 606, 609 ( 351 SE2d 448 ) (1987); Barnett v. State, 211 Ga. App. 651, 652 ( 440 SE2d 247 ) (1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowers v. Southern Railway Co.
green
2 sentences2004Co., 10 Ga.App. 367, 374 , 73 S.E. 677 (1912). 2004Co., 10 Ga.App. 367, 374 , 73 S.E. 677 (1912). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Love v. Hardison
green
2 sentences1998See also Gill v. Bowman, 201 Ga. App. 308 ( 410 SE2d 780 ) (1991); Love v. Hardison, 166 Ga. App. 677 ( 305 SE2d 420 ) (1983). 1998See also Gill v. Bowman, 201 Ga. App. 308 ( 410 SE2d 780 ) (1991); Love v. Hardison, 166 Ga. App. 677 ( 305 SE2d 420 ) (1983). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
United States v. Owens
green
1 sentence1995Owens, 484 U. S. at 560 ; Idaho v. Wright, 497 U. S. 805, 813-824 (110 SC 3139, 111 LE2d 638) (1990). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.