Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lowe v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Id. (citing Lowe v. State, 455 N.E.2d 1126, 1128 (Ind. 1983)). 2014Id. (citing Lowe v. State, 455 N.E.2d 1126, 1128 (Ind.1983)). | 3 | 3 |
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Allen v. State, 749 N.E.2d 1158, 1170 (Ind. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Miller Elevator Co. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2004If a buyer is found to have actual or constructive notice of the facts underlying the claim, a constructive change issue arises for work exceeding the seope of the contract 'if the [buyer] either expressly or impliedly ordered work outside the scope of the contract, or if the [buyer] otherwise caused the [contractor] to incur additional work.' SIPCO Services Marine Inc. v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 196, 223 (1998) (quoting Miller Elevator Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 662, 678 (1994)). | 1 | 1 |
SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2004If a buyer is found to have actual or constructive notice of the facts underlying the claim, a constructive change issue arises for work exceeding the seope of the contract 'if the [buyer] either expressly or impliedly ordered work outside the scope of the contract, or if the [buyer] otherwise caused the [contractor] to incur additional work.' SIPCO Services Marine Inc. v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 196, 223 (1998) (quoting Miller Elevator Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 662, 678 (1994)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brian S. Adcock v. State of Indiana
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2019 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences2017Id. (citing Lowe v. State, 455 N.E.2d 1126, 1128 (Ind. 1983)). 2014Id. (citing Lowe v. State, 455 N.E.2d 1126, 1128 (Ind.1983)). | 2 | 2014–2017 |
Fuentes v. United States
green
1 sentence2011At one point in his brief, Kelly states: Faced with no findings on the merits, this Court can either remand for further proceedings in the post-conviction court, as in [State v.] Van Cleave, [ 681 N.E.2d 181 (Ind. 1997). cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1119, 118 S.Ct. *301 1060, 140 L.Ed.2d 121 (1998)] or rule on the merits of the claim. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Van Cleave
green
1 sentence2011At one point in his brief, Kelly states: Faced with no findings on the merits, this Court can either remand for further proceedings in the post-conviction court, as in [State v.] Van Cleave, [ 681 N.E.2d 181 (Ind. 1997). cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1119, 118 S.Ct. *301 1060, 140 L.Ed.2d 121 (1998)] or rule on the merits of the claim. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Metropolitan Real Estate Corp. v. Frey
green
2 sentences1986In Metropolitan Real Estate Corp. v. Frey, supra, 480 N.E.2d 267 , we quoted from 6 C. 1986In Metropolitan Real Estate Corp. v. Frey, supra, 480 N.E.2d 267 , we quoted from 6 C. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.