9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Webbgreen2 sentences1996See State v. Webb, 242 Kan. 519 , 748 P.2d 875 (1988) (giving a full historical analysis of allocution). 1996See State v. Webb, 242 Kan. 519 , 748 P.2d 875 (1988) (giving a full historical analysis of allocution). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Apprendi v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2008Recently, these provisions have received renewed attention because of questions regarding the treatment of juvenile adjudications in light of three-strike legislation, sentencing guidelines, and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 , 147 L. 2008Recently, these provisions have received renewed attention because of questions regarding the treatment of juvenile adjudications in light of three-strike legislation, sentencing guidelines, and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 , 147 L. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen
green
1 sentence2026Like all analogical reasoning, determining whether a historical regulation is a proper analogue for a distinctly modern firearm regulation requires a determination of whether the two regulations are 'relevantly similar.' [Citation omitted.]" Bruen, 597 U.S. at 28-29 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Chapman v. California
red
1 sentence2016Chapman, 386 U.S. at 22 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Thornton
green
2 sentences2006State v. Thornton, 224 Kan. 127 , 577 P.2d 1190 (1978), appears to be the first case discussing merger in the context of multiplicity (other than in a felony-murder case, e.g., State v. Rueckert, 221 Kan. 727, 734-35 , 561 P.2d 850 [1977]). 2006State v. Thornton, 224 Kan. 127 , 577 P.2d 1190 (1978), appears to be the first case discussing merger in the context of multiplicity (other than in a felony-murder case, e.g., State v. Rueckert, 221 Kan. 727, 734-35 , 561 P.2d 850 [1977]). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Rueckert
green
2 sentences2006State v. Thornton, 224 Kan. 127 , 577 P.2d 1190 (1978), appears to be the first case discussing merger in the context of multiplicity (other than in a felony-murder case, e.g., State v. Rueckert, 221 Kan. 727, 734-35 , 561 P.2d 850 [1977]). 2006State v. Thornton, 224 Kan. 127 , 577 P.2d 1190 (1978), appears to be the first case discussing merger in the context of multiplicity (other than in a felony-murder case, e.g., State v. Rueckert, 221 Kan. 727, 734-35 , 561 P.2d 850 [1977]). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2004State v. Lopez, 271 Kan. 119, 139 , 22 P.3d 1040 (2001). 2004State v. Lopez, 271 Kan. 119, 139 , 22 P.3d 1040 (2001). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Bowers v. Ottenad
green
2 sentences1994When the injury or damage results from the condition of the premises as opposed to the activity thereon, the duty of the occupier to the licensee is only to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring the licensee.” 240 Kan. 208 , Syl. ¶ 4. 1994When the injury or damage results from the condition of the premises as opposed to the activity thereon, the duty of the occupier to the licensee is only to refrain from willfully or wantonly injuring the licensee." 240 Kan. 208 , Syl. ¶ 4. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Fretwell v. Carter
neutral
1 sentence1968Ed. 2d 542 , 78 S. Ct. 531 , this court rejected a similar contention advanced here, and in doing so, reaffirmed the doctrine of LaHarpe and Kansas-Nebraska, and said: . . the production and distribution of natural gas for light, fuel and power is a business of a public nature, the control of which belongs to the state . . .” (1. c. 460.) We need not pursue the subject further, and again reiterate the historical doctrine prevailing in the decisions of this court and in our statute that the production, transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas for light, fuel and power is a business | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.