Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pojanowski v. Hartgreen2 sentences1987The crucial question is whether the employer had “actual knowledge.” In Pojanowski v. Hart, 288 Minn. 77, 81 , 178 N.W.2d 913, 916 (1970), we addressed that portion of the notice requirement of section 176.141 as follows: ‘Actual knowledge’ is knowledge of such information as would put a reasonable man on inquiry. * * * Mere knowledge of a disability following a traumatic injury is not sufficient, for the facts and circumstances of either the disability or the injury must be such as would put a reasonable man on inquiry that the disability is work-related. 1987The crucial question is whether the employer had “actual knowledge.” In Pojanowski v. Hart, 288 Minn. 77, 81 , 178 N.W.2d 913, 916 (1970), we addressed that portion of the notice requirement of section 176.141 as follows: ‘Actual knowledge’ is knowledge of such information as would put a reasonable man on inquiry. * * * Mere knowledge of a disability following a traumatic injury is not sufficient, for the facts and circumstances of either the disability or the injury must be such as would put a reasonable man on inquiry that the disability is work-related. | 4 | 5 |
Murphy v. Country House, Inc.green2 sentences1980Furthermore, “[f]raud is proved with reference to the specific intelligence and experience of the aggrieved party rather than a reasonable-man standard.” Murphy v. Country House, Inc., 307 Minn. 344, 351 , 240 N.W.2d 507, 512 (1976). 1980Furthermore, “[f]raud is proved with reference to the specific intelligence and experience of the aggrieved party rather than a reasonable-man standard.” Murphy v. Country House, Inc., 307 Minn. 344, 351 , 240 N.W.2d 507, 512 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Greene v. W & W GENERATOR REBUILDERSgreen2 sentences1980No written notice was given within that period, and relators argue that they did not have actual knowledge, defined in Pojanowski v. Hart, 288 Minn. 77 , 178 N.W.2d 913 (1970), and Greene v. W & W Generator Rebuilders, 302 Minn. 542 , 224 N.W.2d 157 (1974), as such information as would put a reasonable man on inquiry that the disability was work related. 1980No written notice was given within that period, and relators argue that they did not have actual knowledge, defined in Pojanowski v. Hart, 288 Minn. 77 , 178 N.W.2d 913 (1970), and Greene v. W & W Generator Rebuilders, 302 Minn. 542 , 224 N.W.2d 157 (1974), as such information as would put a reasonable man on inquiry that the disability was work related. | 1 | 1 |
Kling v. St. Barnabas Hospitalgreen2 sentences1980Barnabas Hospital, 291 Minn. 257, 262 , 190 N.W.2d 674, 678 (1971). 1980Barnabas Hospital, 291 Minn. 257, 262 , 190 N.W.2d 674, 678 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Spiess v. Brandtgreen2 sentences1976Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246, 254 , 41 N. W. 2d 561, 567 (1950). 1976Spiess v. Brandt, 230 Minn. 246, 254 , 41 N. W. 2d 561, 567 (1950). | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Lucas Construction Companygreen1 sentence1976Young v. Lucas Const. Co. 454 S. W. 2d 638, 641 (Mo. App. 1970). *351 Fraud is proved with reference to the specific intelligence and experience of the aggrieved party rather than a reasonable-man standard. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davidson v. Bermo, Inc.
green
2 sentences1974Davidson v. Bermo, Inc. 272 Minn. 97 , 137 N. W. (2d) 567 .” The commission accepted employee’s testimony that he had complained to several superiors that the heavy work was bothering his back. 1974Davidson v. Bermo, Inc. 272 Minn. 97 , 137 N. W. (2d) 567 .” The commission accepted employee’s testimony that he had complained to several superiors that the heavy work was bothering his back. | 2 | 1970–1974 |
Abrams v. United States
green
2 sentences1979But under our system of government, we have chosen to afford protection even to ‘opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death,’ Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 , 40 S.Ct. 17 , 63 L.Ed. 1173 (Holmes, J., dissenting). 1979But under our system of government, we have chosen to afford protection even to ‘opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death,’ Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 , 40 S.Ct. 17 , 63 L.Ed. 1173 (Holmes, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.