Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cooper v. Trentgreen1 sentence2024See In re McBride Operating, LLC, No. 12-22-00279-CV, 2022 WL 17828401 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 7, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“Magic words are not required; ‘[a]t issue is whether the grounds for dismissal are clear from the motion.’” (quoting Cooper v. Trent, 551 S.W.3d 325, 331 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, pet. denied))); Wooley v. 3 Schaffer, 447 S.W.3d 71 , 77 n.12 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (same). 4300 Burch argued in the motion that Andrews’ claim had no basis in law because she had already attacked the 2017 Judgment in another proceeding a | 1 | 1 |
Wyatt v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Wyatt v. State, 23 S.W.3d 18, 30 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Zuliani v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Id. at 594 . 2014See Zuliani v. State, 97 S.W.3d 589, 594-95 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Flameout Design & Fabrication, Inc. v. Pennzoil Caspian Corp.green1 sentence2010See Knott , 128 S.W.3d at 216 (holding that we must affirm summary judgment order if any theory advanced is meritorious); Flameout Design & Fabrication , 994 S.W.2d at 834 (holding that trial court must grant summary judgment unless non-movant meets its burden of producing evidence raising genuine issue of material fact on challenged elements). | 1 | 1 |
Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knottgreen1 sentence2010See Knott , 128 S.W.3d at 216 (holding that we must affirm summary judgment order if any theory advanced is meritorious); Flameout Design & Fabrication , 994 S.W.2d at 834 (holding that trial court must grant summary judgment unless non-movant meets its burden of producing evidence raising genuine issue of material fact on challenged elements). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Alice Andrewsgreen1 sentence2009See id. (‘We need not determine whether the statute can apply to plaintiffs represented by counsel because, in this case, Drake is not.”). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2006See Walker v. Harris , 924 S.W.2d 375, 377 (Tex. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Stephens v. Dolcefinogreen1 sentence2006App. P. 33.1(a) ; see also Stephens v. Dolcefino , 126 S.W.3d 120 , 133–34 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (holding that trial court may accept summary judgment evidence filed late, even after summary judgment, as long as court affirmatively indicates in record that it accepted or considered that evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Wheeler v. Greengreen2 sentences2006We construe Andrews’s challenge on appeal and below to be that the trial court erred because it denied Andrews’s request to file a belated summary-judgment respons e. See Wheeler v. Green , 157 S.W.3d. 439, 442 (Tex. 2005) (holding that although appellant never filed motion to allow belated summary-judgment response, arguments and requests in her motion for new trial were sufficient to put trial court on notice of exactly that complaint); Tex. R. 2006We construe Andrews’s challenge on appeal and below to be that the trial court erred because it denied Andrews’s request to file a belated summary-judgment respons e. See Wheeler v. Green , 157 S.W.3d. 439, 442 (Tex. 2005) (holding that although appellant never filed motion to allow belated summary-judgment response, arguments and requests in her motion for new trial were sufficient to put trial court on notice of exactly that complaint); Tex. R. | 1 | 1 |
Maxfield v. Terrygreen1 sentence2006See Maxfield , 888 S.W.2d at 811 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Andrews v. State
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 103-04 . 2007Id. at 103-04 . | 3 | 2007–2008 |
William Carl Wooley v. Randy Schaffer
green
1 sentence2024See In re McBride Operating, LLC, No. 12-22-00279-CV, 2022 WL 17828401 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 7, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“Magic words are not required; ‘[a]t issue is whether the grounds for dismissal are clear from the motion.’” (quoting Cooper v. Trent, 551 S.W.3d 325, 331 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, pet. denied))); Wooley v. 3 Schaffer, 447 S.W.3d 71 , 77 n.12 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (same). 4300 Burch argued in the motion that Andrews’ claim had no basis in law because she had already attacked the 2017 Judgment in another proceeding a | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Garrett v. State
red
1 sentence2019Garrett, 749 S.W.2d at 803 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.