land claim (Utah) · Go Syfert
← Utah issues

land claim in Utah

9 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Valcarce v. Fitzgeraldgreen
utah · 1998 · cited in 6 Utah opinions naming this issue, 1999–2020
2 sentences

2020Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305 , 311–12 (Utah 1998) (“[O]nce a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse.

2017However, “once a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse.” Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 311 (Utah 1998) (plurality opinion).

56
Zollinger v. Frankgreen
utah · 1946 · cited in 3 Utah opinions naming this issue, 1998–2017
2 sentences

2017At that point, the landowner, “to prevent the prescriptive easement from arising[,] has the burden of showing that the use was under him instead of against him.” Zollinger v. Frank, 175 P.2d 714, 716 (Utah 1946).

2015See Zollinger, 175 P.2d at 715 . $22 Thus, the presumption of adverse use applies onee the allegedly adverse user has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, absent evidence of a license or consent of the servient landowner.

33
Richins v. Struhsgreen
utah · 1966 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015A. Presumption of Adverse Use 117 Appellants first argue that the trial court erred by presuming adverse - use and that the court should have instead presumed permissive use. "[Olnce a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse." Valcarce, 961 P.2d at 811 ; see also Richins v. Struhs, 17 Utah 2d 356 , 412 P.2d 814 , 315 (1966) (holding that "when a claimant has shown that such a use has existed peaceably and without interference for the prescriptive period of 20 years, the

11
Nazario v. Almodóvargreen
prsupreme · 1918 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013The burden then shifts to the landowner opposing the easement to "establish[ ] that the use was initially permissive." Id. at 311-12 ; cf. Buckley, 247 P.2d at 279 ; Harkness v. Woodmansee, 7 Utah 227 , 26 P. 291 , 298 (1891) ("Where a person opens a way for the use of his own premises, and another person uses it also without causing damage, the presumption is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, th[at] such use by the latter was permissive, and not under a claim of right.").

11
Buckley v. COXgreen
utah · 1952 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013To establish a prescriptive easement, a party must show, "by clear and convincing evidence," Buckley v. Cox, 122 Utah 151 , 247 P.2d 277, 279 (1952), that its use of the area in question has been "(1) open, (2) notorious, (8) adverse, and (4) continuous for at least 20 years," Marchant v. Park City, 788 P.2d 520, 524 (Utah 1990). "[Olnee a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse." Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 311 (Utah 1998).

2013To establish a prescriptive easement, a party must show, "by clear and convincing evidence," Buckley v. Cox, 122 Utah 151 , 247 P.2d 277, 279 (1952), that its use of the area in question has been "(1) open, (2) notorious, (8) adverse, and (4) continuous for at least 20 years," Marchant v. Park City, 788 P.2d 520, 524 (Utah 1990). "[Olnee a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse." Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 311 (Utah 1998).

11
Harkness v. Woodmanseegreen
utah · 1891 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013The burden then shifts to the landowner opposing the easement to "establish[ ] that the use was initially permissive." Id. at 311-12 ; cf. Buckley, 247 P.2d at 279 ; Harkness v. Woodmansee, 7 Utah 227 , 26 P. 291 , 298 (1891) ("Where a person opens a way for the use of his own premises, and another person uses it also without causing damage, the presumption is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, th[at] such use by the latter was permissive, and not under a claim of right.").

11
Marchant v. Park Citygreen
utah · 1990 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013To establish a prescriptive easement, a party must show, "by clear and convincing evidence," Buckley v. Cox, 122 Utah 151 , 247 P.2d 277, 279 (1952), that its use of the area in question has been "(1) open, (2) notorious, (8) adverse, and (4) continuous for at least 20 years," Marchant v. Park City, 788 P.2d 520, 524 (Utah 1990). "[Olnee a claimant has shown an open and continuous use of the land under claim of right for the twenty-year prescriptive period, the use will be presumed to have been adverse." Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 311 (Utah 1998).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Harrison v. Spah Family LTD green
utah · 2020
1 sentence

2020We note, of course, that landowners are free to defend their property rights through any appropriate legal avenue, including by requesting a preliminary injunction at the beginning of litigation. 37 Valcarce v. Fitzgerald, 961 P.2d 305, 311 (Utah 1998). 38 Id. at 312 (emphasis added). 16 Cite as: 2020 UT 22 Opinion of the Court Harrisons assert that the use in this case was initially permissive, so they have rebutted the presumption of adverseness.

12020–2020
Apffel v. Huddleston green
utd · 1999
1 sentence

2007Id. at 1141 .

12007–2007
Crane v. Crane green
utah · 1984
1 sentence

1999However, “[a] use need not be ‘regular’ or ‘constant! in order to be ‘continuous.’ All that is necessary is that the use be as often as required by the nature of the use and the needs of the claimant.” Crane, 683 P.2d at 1064 . ¶ 21 The trial court found that water had been continuously stored in the Blue Lakes and that the timing of water storage and release coincided with water availability, climatic conditions, and crop needs.

11999–1999
Corrada v. García neutral
prsupreme · 1905
1 sentence

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

11921–1921
Yates v. Hurd green
colo · 1885
1 sentence

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

11921–1921
Ford v. Loomis green
mich · 1876
1 sentence

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

11921–1921
Trumpower v. Marcey neutral
mich · 1892
2 sentences

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

11921–1921
Dozer v. Squires neutral
la · 1839
1 sentence

1921Dec. 516 ; Yates v. Hurd, 8 Colo. 343 , 8 Pac. 575 ; Trumpower v. Marcey, 92 Mich. 529 , 52 N. W. 999 ; Ford v. Loomis, 33 Mich. 121 ; Dozer v. Squires, 13 La. 130 .

11921–1921
Riley v. Quigley neutral
ill · 1869
1 sentence

1921Under such circumstances they state the rule to be, and we think correctly, as follows: “Where a person about to purchase property in the possession of a stranger to the title honestly and properly asks of the possessor for information as to his rights, and such information is willfully refused, he may deal with the land on the presumption that the title is in fact as disclosed by the record, and the person in possession is estopped from setting up his claim to the injury of him to whom he refuses the .information.” Counsel cite the following cases in support of the above: Riley v. Quigley, 50

11921–1921

Where else courts name it

NC 61 (1918–2025) TX 38 (1892–2016) PA 20 (1846–2026) IL 18 (1896–2019) CA 13 (1859–2023) OH 13 (1961–2012) LA 12 (1919–2015) NY 12 (1891–2024) MO 12 (1894–2019) TN 11 (1945–2020) RI 11 (1968–2012) FL 11 (1894–2008) OK 10 (1921–2018) MA 9 (1902–2005) UT 9 (1921–2020) MS 9 (1885–2007) KS 8 (1896–2015) GA 8 (1900–1964) AR 8 (1907–2014) MD 7 (1927–2026) MI 7 (1893–2024) WA 7 (1923–2013) AL 7 (1937–2014) NJ 6 (1982–2020) IN 6 (1996–2025) OR 6 (1966–2023) WI 5 (1885–2026) ME 4 (1998–2025) MN 4 (1890–2026) WV 3 (1927–1954) IA 3 (1903–1940) AK 3 (1997–2009) HI 3 (1911–2025) NE 3 (1908–2021) VT 3 (1847–2013) CT 3 (1994–2011) KY 3 (1952–2008) NM 3 (1991–2004) ND 2 (1921–2014) DE 2 (2017–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check