land claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

land claim in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1923–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Noltiegreen
wash · 1991 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013Noltie, 116 Wn.2d at 849 (emphasis omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
In re the Personal Restraint of Orange green
wash · 2004
1 sentence

2013Restraint of Orange, 152 Wn.2d 795, 820 , 100 P.3d 291 (2004) (attempted murder and assault were the same offense where both were proved by a single gunshot directed at the same victim). ¶17 Because of the potential for a double jeopardy violation, it is appropriate to consider Land’s claim that the jury instructions were deficient. ¶18 In Noltie, where the defendant was charged with two different instances of statutory rape, the possibility that he would be twice convicted for the same offense was averted by language in the to-convict instruction stating that the second count required proof o

12013–2013
In Re Orange green
wash · 2005
1 sentence

2013Restraint of Orange, 152 Wn.2d 795, 820 , 100 P.3d 291 (2004) (attempted murder and assault were the same offense where both were proved by a single gunshot directed at the same victim). ¶17 Because of the potential for a double jeopardy violation, it is appropriate to consider Land’s claim that the jury instructions were deficient. ¶18 In Noltie, where the defendant was charged with two different instances of statutory rape, the possibility that he would be twice convicted for the same offense was averted by language in the to-convict instruction stating that the second count required proof o

12013–2013
Oliver v. United States green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

1985And, by marking the boundaries of the land with warnings that the public should not intrude, the owner has dispelled any ambiguity as to his desires." Oliver, 80 L.

1985And, by marking the boundaries of the land with warnings that the public should not intrude, the owner has dispelled any ambiguity as to his desires." Oliver, 80 L.Ed.2d at 235 .

11985–1985
Hill v. L. W. Weidert Farms, Inc. neutral
wash · 1969
2 sentences

1976Weidert Farms, Inc., 75 Wn.2d 871, 874 , 454 P.2d 220 (1969): Whether or not respondents are entitled to the land by a claim of adverse possession is a question of fact, and as *33 we have often stated, when the findings of the trial court are amply sustained by the record, as they are in the instant case, this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. [Citations omitted.] Does the evidence support the trial court's finding of actual or inquiry notice?

1976Weidert Farms, Inc., 75 Wn.2d 871, 874 , 454 P.2d 220 (1969): Whether or not respondents are entitled to the land by a claim of adverse possession is a question of fact, and as *33 we have often stated, when the findings of the trial court are amply sustained by the record, as they are in the instant case, this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. [Citations omitted.] Does the evidence support the trial court's finding of actual or inquiry notice?

11976–1976
Hollingbery v. Dunn green
wash · 1966
2 sentences

1969Sander v. Wells, 71 Wn.2d 25 , 426 P.2d 81 (1967); Hollingbery v. Dunn, 68 Wn.2d 75 , 411 P.2d 431 (1966); Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570 , 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

1969Sander v. Wells, 71 Wn.2d 25 , 426 P.2d 81 (1967); Hollingbery v. Dunn, 68 Wn.2d 75 , 411 P.2d 431 (1966); Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570 , 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

11969–1969
Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. green
wash · 1959
2 sentences

1969Sander v. Wells, 71 Wn.2d 25 , 426 P.2d 81 (1967); Hollingbery v. Dunn, 68 Wn.2d 75 , 411 P.2d 431 (1966); Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570 , 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

1969Sander v. Wells, 71 Wn.2d 25 , 426 P.2d 81 (1967); Hollingbery v. Dunn, 68 Wn.2d 75 , 411 P.2d 431 (1966); Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570 , 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

11969–1969
Sander v. Wells green
wash · 1967
1 sentence

1969Sander v. Wells, 71 Wn.2d 25 , 426 P.2d 81 (1967); Hollingbery v. Dunn, 68 Wn.2d 75 , 411 P.2d 431 (1966); Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570 , 343 P.2d 183 (1959).

11969–1969
State v. Kosai green
wash · 1925
2 sentences

1925State v. Kosai, 133 Wash. 442 , 234 Pac. 5 .

1925State v. Kosai, 133 Wash. 442 , 234 Pac. 5 .

11925–1925
Frick v. Webb green
· 1923
1 sentence

1924In the case of Frick v. Webb, 263 U. S. 326 , it was held that, under the California act, an alien ineligible to citizenship could not acquire stock in corporations which held land for agricultural purposes.

11924–1924
Webb v. O'BRIEN green
scotus · 1923
1 sentence

1924In Webb v. O’Brien, 263 U. S. 313 , the supreme court of the United States, again having before it the California act, held that a contract permitting an ineligible alien to live upon and work land for a share in the crops gave him a right to use and share in the profits of the land in violation of the statutory prohibition against the acquisition of any interest in real estate.

11924–1924
Union Farm Land Co. v. Isaacs neutral
wash · 1919
2 sentences

1923Union Farm Land Co. v. Isaacs, 106 Wash. 168 , 179 Pac. 84 .

1923Union Farm Land Co. v. Isaacs, 106 Wash. 168 , 179 Pac. 84 .

11923–1923

Where else courts name it

NC 61 (1918–2025) TX 38 (1892–2016) PA 20 (1846–2026) IL 18 (1896–2019) CA 13 (1859–2023) OH 13 (1961–2012) LA 12 (1919–2015) NY 12 (1891–2024) MO 12 (1894–2019) TN 11 (1945–2020) RI 11 (1968–2012) FL 11 (1894–2008) OK 10 (1921–2018) MA 9 (1902–2005) UT 9 (1921–2020) MS 9 (1885–2007) KS 8 (1896–2015) GA 8 (1900–1964) AR 8 (1907–2014) MD 7 (1927–2026) MI 7 (1893–2024) WA 7 (1923–2013) AL 7 (1937–2014) NJ 6 (1982–2020) IN 6 (1996–2025) OR 6 (1966–2023) WI 5 (1885–2026) ME 4 (1998–2025) MN 4 (1890–2026) WV 3 (1927–1954) IA 3 (1903–1940) AK 3 (1997–2009) HI 3 (1911–2025) NE 3 (1908–2021) VT 3 (1847–2013) CT 3 (1994–2011) KY 3 (1952–2008) NM 3 (1991–2004) ND 2 (1921–2014) DE 2 (2017–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check