dangerous rule (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

dangerous rule in Georgia

8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1892–1994 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Shepherd v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1948 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1956–1988
2 sentences

1988A. A. had complete possession and control of the car at any time the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not "a sound, abstract principle of law" and is "`a dangerous rule for the numerous owners of motor vehicles.'" Id.; Shepherd v. State, 77 Ga. App. 857, 858 ( 50 SE2d 111 ).

1988A. A. had complete possession and control of the car at any time the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not "a sound, abstract principle of law" and is "`a dangerous rule for the numerous owners of motor vehicles.'" Id.; Shepherd v. State, 77 Ga. App. 857, 858 ( 50 SE2d 111 ).

22
Muhammad v. Stategreen
ga · 1979 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994“Where it is established that other persons had equal access to the vehicle, ‘the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not a sound, abstract principle of law and is a dangerous rule for the numerous owners [or drivers] of motor vehicles.’ . . . [Cit.]” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131 (1), 132 ( 427 SE2d 101 ). “[H]aving eliminated the presumption of possession, what remains [in the case sub judice is defendant’s] mere presence near hidden cocaine.” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131, 132 , supra. “[M]ere proof of the accused’s presence at the scene of

1994“Where it is established that other persons had equal access to the vehicle, ‘the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not a sound, abstract principle of law and is a dangerous rule for the numerous owners [or drivers] of motor vehicles.’ . . . [Cit.]” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131 (1), 132 ( 427 SE2d 101 ). “[H]aving eliminated the presumption of possession, what remains [in the case sub judice is defendant’s] mere presence near hidden cocaine.” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131, 132 , supra. “[M]ere proof of the accused’s presence at the scene of

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Whipple v. State green
gactapp · 1993
2 sentences

1994“Where it is established that other persons had equal access to the vehicle, ‘the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not a sound, abstract principle of law and is a dangerous rule for the numerous owners [or drivers] of motor vehicles.’ . . . [Cit.]” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131 (1), 132 ( 427 SE2d 101 ). “[H]aving eliminated the presumption of possession, what remains [in the case sub judice is defendant’s] mere presence near hidden cocaine.” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131, 132 , supra. “[M]ere proof of the accused’s presence at the scene of

1994“Where it is established that other persons had equal access to the vehicle, ‘the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it is not a sound, abstract principle of law and is a dangerous rule for the numerous owners [or drivers] of motor vehicles.’ . . . [Cit.]” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131 (1), 132 ( 427 SE2d 101 ). “[H]aving eliminated the presumption of possession, what remains [in the case sub judice is defendant’s] mere presence near hidden cocaine.” Whipple v. State, 207 Ga. App. 131, 132 , supra. “[M]ere proof of the accused’s presence at the scene of

11994–1994
In the Interest of C. A. A. green
gactapp · 1988
1 sentence

1993Where it is established that other persons had equal access to the vehicle, “the application of a presumption of possession of any contraband found in it istnot a sound, abstract principle of law and is a dangerous rule for the numerous owners of motor vehicles.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Id. at 693 .

11993–1993
Fears v. State green
gactapp · 1983
2 sentences

1988The Farmer rule just stated was reaffirmed in Fears v. State, 169 Ga. App. 172 ( 312 SE2d 174 ).

1988The Farmer rule just stated was reaffirmed in Fears v. State, 169 Ga. App. 172 ( 312 SE2d 174 ).

11988–1988
Fannin v. State green
texcrimapp · 1907
1 sentence

1938Such point was not involved; but the court said: “This is more than a simple trespass, and it will be a dangerous doctrine to hold that a man can thus collect his debts.” The Criminal Court of Appeals of Texas, in Fannin v. State, 51 Tex. Cr. 41 ( 100 S. W. 916 , 10 L.

11938–1938
Eaves v. Georgian Co. green
gactapp · 1933
2 sentences

1935Forfeitures have never been favorites of the law. “ Courts will readily seize upon conduct or circumstances arising subsequently on the part of parties, to imply a waiver.” Eaves v. Georgian Co., 47 Ga. App. 37 ( 169 S. E. 519 ).

1935Forfeitures have never been favorites of the law. “ Courts will readily seize upon conduct or circumstances arising subsequently on the part of parties, to imply a waiver.” Eaves v. Georgian Co., 47 Ga. App. 37 ( 169 S. E. 519 ).

11935–1935
Fire Ass'n v. Fleming green
ga · 1887
1 sentence

1907I think this case is' controlled by Fire Association v. Fleming, 78 Ga. 733 , and Wikle v. L. & N. R.

11907–1907
Ferguson v. Dent neutral
mo · 1844
1 sentence

1892And see Ferguson v. Dent, 8 Mo. 667 , holding that a recital in the description of the premises is not a covenant; Delmer v. McCabe, 14 Ir.

11892–1892

Where else courts name it

MI 24 (1894–2026) IL 20 (1896–2026) TX 11 (1897–2015) PA 11 (1932–1999) GA 8 (1892–1994) NY 8 (1836–1932) CA 7 (1890–2024) MO 7 (1884–1960) LA 6 (1930–2018) OK 6 (1923–1944) MS 5 (1940–2013) KS 5 (1893–2014) FL 4 (2008–2019) AZ 4 (1899–1935) DC 3 (1997–2025) SD 3 (1909–1922) AL 3 (1886–1977) MD 3 (1913–1993) WI 3 (1913–1925) OR 3 (1911–1961) IA 3 (1900–2004) ID 2 (1905–1921) NC 2 (1952–1966) WA 2 (1914–1998) HI 2 (1925–1954) UT 2 (1901–1967) ND 2 (1902–1956) NV 2 (1885–1968) VA 2 (1926–1941)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check