8 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Steele v. Honeagreen2 sentences2022Any exception must be construed strictly.” (Footnotes omitted.) Steele v. Honea, 261 Ga. 644, 645 (1) (b) ( 409 SE2d 652 ) (1991). 2022Any exception must be construed strictly.” (Footnotes omitted.) Steele v. Honea, 261 Ga. 644, 645 (1) (b) ( 409 SE2d 652 ) (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Campaign for a Prosperous Georgia v. Georgia Power Co.green2 sentences2020If against any other public body or organization subject to an action, to the chief executive officer or clerk thereof.” 9 Campaign for a Prosperous Ga. v. Ga. Power Co., 174 Ga. App. 263, 264-265 ( 329 SE2d 570 ) (1985). 7 required pursuant to OCGA § 49-2-15.10 That Code section, which is in a separate chapter from the chapter on the Child Abuse Registry, provides: When any action is brought against the Department of Human Services, the Board of Human Services, the commissioner of human services, or any employee or agent thereof or when any action is brought in which the department could be h 2020If against any other public body or organization subject to an action, to the chief executive officer or clerk thereof.” 9 Campaign for a Prosperous Ga. v. Ga. Power Co., 174 Ga. App. 263, 264-265 ( 329 SE2d 570 ) (1985). 7 required pursuant to OCGA § 49-2-15.10 That Code section, which is in a separate chapter from the chapter on the Child Abuse Registry, provides: When any action is brought against the Department of Human Services, the Board of Human Services, the commissioner of human services, or any employee or agent thereof or when any action is brought in which the department could be h | 1 | 1 |
Douglas Asphalt Co. v. Georgia Public Service Commissiongreen1 sentence2020See Douglas Asphalt Co., supra, at 712 (1). | 1 | 1 |
Chatman v. Findleygreen2 sentences2016See Chatman v. Findley, 274 Ga. 54, 55 ( 548 SE2d 5 ) (2001); Ramos-Silva v. State Farm Mut. 2016See Chatman v. Findley, 274 Ga. 54, 55 ( 548 SE2d 5 ) (2001); Ramos-Silva v. State Farm Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Blumsack v. Bartow Countygreen2 sentences1997OCGA § 50-21-1; cf. Crisp County School System, supra at 802 (recognizing that the dictum in Gilbert, supra at 751 , regarding an express statutory waiver of sovereign immunity through the purchase of automobile liability insurance, is limited to the facts of that case); Blumsack v. Bartow County, 223 Ga. App. 392, 396 ( 477 SE2d 642 ) (1996) (finding that the purchase of liability insurance for the operation of a vehicle does not waive immunity for actions based on negligent maintenance); Coffee County School Dist., supra at 295 (finding that OCGA § 20-2-991, concerning the purchase of genera 1997OCGA § 50-21-1; cf. Crisp County School System, supra at 802 (recognizing that the dictum in Gilbert, supra at 751 , regarding an express statutory waiver of sovereign immunity through the purchase of automobile liability insurance, is limited to the facts of that case); Blumsack v. Bartow County, 223 Ga. App. 392, 396 ( 477 SE2d 642 ) (1996) (finding that the purchase of liability insurance for the operation of a vehicle does not waive immunity for actions based on negligent maintenance); Coffee County School Dist., supra at 295 (finding that OCGA § 20-2-991, concerning the purchase of genera | 1 | 1 |
Echols v. DeKalb Countygreen2 sentences1981Echols v. DeKalb County, 146 Ga. App. 560, 561-562 ( 247 SE2d 114 ). 1981Echols v. DeKalb County, 146 Ga. App. 560, 561-562 ( 247 SE2d 114 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Georgia Ports Authority v. Harris
green
1 sentence2005Moreover, the Supreme Court added, “we disapprove the language in the Court of Appeals’ opinion intimating that potential claimants may waive the express statutory requirement that a receipt be obtained for personally delivered ante litem notices and reaffirm that the GTCA must be strictly construed.” Id. at 150 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Gresham v. Symmers
green
1 sentence1972We further hold that Gresham v. Symmers, 227 Ga. 616 is not applicable to the case in question. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.