8 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement Plantgreen2 sentences1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). 1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). | 1 | 2 |
In Re Request for Opinion of the Supreme Court Relative to Constitutionality of SDLCgreen1 sentence2013See In re Request for Op. of Sup. Ct. Relative to Constitutionality of SDCL *68 21-32-17, 379 N.W.2d 822, 826-27 (S.D.1985) (stating that “we have held that in the absence of an express statutory waiver, the doctrine of sovereign immunity expressed in our constitution will not be abrogated”). [¶ 34.] Title 21 of the South Dakota Codified Laws governs South Dakota’s judicial remedies. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Estate of Hamiltongreen2 sentences2012Such a result would contradict the express statutory requirement that an individual who aids and abets in the commission of a crime “shall be prosecuted, tried, and punished as a principal.” See SDCL 22-3-3.1. [¶ 26.] We have stated that a statute “must be construed according to [its] intent,” and the intent of a statute “must be determined from the statute as a whole, as well as enactments relating to the same subject.” In re Estate of Hamilton, 2012 S.D. 34, ¶ 7 , 814 N.W.2d 141, 143 (quoting Martinmaas v. Engelmann, 2000 S.D. 85 , ¶ 49, 612 N.W.2d 600, 611 ). 2012Such a result would contradict the express statutory requirement that an individual who aids and abets in the commission of a crime “shall be prosecuted, tried, and punished as a principal.” See SDCL 22-3-3.1. [¶ 26.] We have stated that a statute “must be construed according to [its] intent,” and the intent of a statute “must be determined from the statute as a whole, as well as enactments relating to the same subject.” In re Estate of Hamilton, 2012 S.D. 34, ¶ 7 , 814 N.W.2d 141, 143 (quoting Martinmaas v. Engelmann, 2000 S.D. 85 , ¶ 49, 612 N.W.2d 600, 611 ). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2009State v. Davis, 295 Or. 227 , 666 P.2d 802, 809 (1983). 2009State v. Davis, 295 Or. 227 , 666 P.2d 802, 809 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Van Emmerik v. Stategreen1 sentence1989Accord: Van Emmerik v. State, 298 N.W.2d 804, 805-7 (S.D.1980) (sales tax refund may be claimed only as legislature directs). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Merrill Ex Rel. Merrill v. Birhanzel
green
2 sentences1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). 1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). | 3 | 1984–1987 |
Kringen v. Shea
green
2 sentences1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). 1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). | 3 | 1984–1987 |
High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer
green
2 sentences1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). 1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). | 2 | 1984–1987 |
Arms v. Minnehaha County
green
2 sentences1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). 1987In the absence of an express statutory waiver, we strictly adhere to this constitutionally mandated doctrine. 349 N.W.2d at 410 (citing Kringen v. Shea, 333 N.W.2d 445 (S.D.1983); Merrill v. Birhanzel, 310 N.W.2d 522 (S.D.1981); High-Grade Oil Co., Inc. v. Sommer, 295 N.W.2d 736 (S.D.1980); Arms v. Minnehaha County, 69 S.D. 164 , 7 N.W.2d 722 (1943)). | 2 | 1984–1987 |
Martinmaas v. Engelmann
green
1 sentence2012Such a result would contradict the express statutory requirement that an individual who aids and abets in the commission of a crime “shall be prosecuted, tried, and punished as a principal.” See SDCL 22-3-3.1. [¶ 26.] We have stated that a statute “must be construed according to [its] intent,” and the intent of a statute “must be determined from the statute as a whole, as well as enactments relating to the same subject.” In re Estate of Hamilton, 2012 S.D. 34, ¶ 7 , 814 N.W.2d 141, 143 (quoting Martinmaas v. Engelmann, 2000 S.D. 85 , ¶ 49, 612 N.W.2d 600, 611 ). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Rotenberger v. Burghduff
green
1 sentence2012“Statutes are to be construed to give effect to each statute and so as to have them exist in harmony.” Rotenberger, 2007 S.D. 7 , ¶ 8, 727 N.W.2d at 294 (quoting State v. $1,010 in Am. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.