5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chrysler Corp. v. Maioccogreen2 sentences2017See Chrysler Corp. v. Maiocco , 209 Conn. 579 , 588, 552 A.2d 1207 (1989) ( "Magnuson-Moss [Act] gives authority to the court to grant attorney's fees in a civil suit"). 13 Because we have determined in part II of this opinion, however, that the court improperly rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on count two, the plaintiff cannot reasonably rely upon that statutory grant of authority as a legal basis for upholding the court's award of attorney's fees with respect to count two. 2017See Chrysler Corp. v. Maiocco , 209 Conn. 579 , 588, 552 A.2d 1207 (1989) ( "Magnuson-Moss [Act] gives authority to the court to grant attorney's fees in a civil suit"). 13 Because we have determined in part II of this opinion, however, that the court improperly rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on count two, the plaintiff cannot reasonably rely upon that statutory grant of authority as a legal basis for upholding the court's award of attorney's fees with respect to count two. | 1 | 1 |
Mullaney v. Wilburgreen2 sentences2016See Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 , 95 S.Ct. 1881 , 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975). 2016See Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 , 95 S.Ct. 1881 , 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Kozlowski v. Commissioner of Transportationgreen2 sentences2009See Kozlowski v. Commissioner of Transportation, 274 Conn. 497, 502 , 876 A.2d 1148 (2005); see also Federal Deposit Ins. 2009See Kozlowski v. Commissioner of Transportation, 274 Conn. 497, 502 , 876 A.2d 1148 (2005); see also Federal Deposit Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
1 sentence2008To the extent that Reinke remains good law, we see no reason to extend its limited holding to the factual scenario presented by this criminal case. 10 Defense counsel relied on Crawford v. Washington, supra, 541 U.S. 36 , as one of the bases for his objection to Graham’s testimony regarding the contents of Smith’s statement. 11 Graham testified that he had Smith raise his right hand and swear to the truthfulness of the typewritten statement, which Smith did. 12 The state does not claim on appeal that Smith’s statements were not testimonial in nature within the meaning of Crawford. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Herman v. Division of Special Revenue
green
2 sentences1993The plaintiff also argues that the termination by the defendants of his employment with the division qualified as a contested case because an agency personnel policy required that the defendants determine the plaintiffs legal right or privilege in continued employment subsequent to his having had a meaningful opportunity to be heard. 7 In support of his argument, the plaintiff suggests that the test for determining whether a proceeding is a contested case was expanded in All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 212 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989), wherein the court stat 1993The plaintiff also argues that the termination by the defendants of his employment with the division qualified as a contested case because an agency personnel policy required that the defendants determine the plaintiffs legal right or privilege in continued employment subsequent to his having had a meaningful opportunity to be heard. 7 In support of his argument, the plaintiff suggests that the test for determining whether a proceeding is a contested case was expanded in All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 212 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989), wherein the court stat | 1 | 1993–1993 |
All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control
green
2 sentences1993The plaintiff also argues that the termination by the defendants of his employment with the division qualified as a contested case because an agency personnel policy required that the defendants determine the plaintiffs legal right or privilege in continued employment subsequent to his having had a meaningful opportunity to be heard. 7 In support of his argument, the plaintiff suggests that the test for determining whether a proceeding is a contested case was expanded in All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 212 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989), wherein the court stat 1993The plaintiff also argues that the termination by the defendants of his employment with the division qualified as a contested case because an agency personnel policy required that the defendants determine the plaintiffs legal right or privilege in continued employment subsequent to his having had a meaningful opportunity to be heard. 7 In support of his argument, the plaintiff suggests that the test for determining whether a proceeding is a contested case was expanded in All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 212 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989), wherein the court stat | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.