8 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baze v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2016See Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997) (detennining the unlawfulness of an arrest is not a defense to a prosecution for resisting arrest); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 245 S.W.3d 821, 823-25 (Ky.App.2008) (determining the exclusionary rule does not apply to suppress evidence of assault on an officer after an illegal entry). 2008See, Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1083 , 118 S.Ct. 1536 , 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2026We likewise find that the unlawfulness of an entry or search is not a defense to an assault on a police officer. 245 S.W.3d at 824–25. 2016See Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997) (detennining the unlawfulness of an arrest is not a defense to a prosecution for resisting arrest); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 245 S.W.3d 821, 823-25 (Ky.App.2008) (determining the exclusionary rule does not apply to suppress evidence of assault on an officer after an illegal entry). | 1 | 2 |
Rainey v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2009Rainey v. Commonwealth, 197 S.W.3d 89, 92 (Ky.2006) ("A search incident to an arrest is an exception to the general rule requiring a warrant prior to searches and seizures pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”). 9 . | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Walkergreen1 sentence2008See, Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1083 , 118 S.Ct. 1536 , 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Wheatley v. Oregongreen1 sentence2008See, Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1083 , 118 S.Ct. 1536 , 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
DeBlase v. Rothgreen1 sentence2008See, Baze v. Commonwealth, 965 S.W.2d 817, 821 (Ky.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1083 , 118 S.Ct. 1536 , 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Heck v. Humphreygreen1 sentence2007From that point on, any damages recoverable must be based on a malicious prosecution claim and on the wrongful use of judicial process rather than detention itself.” Keeton, supra, § 119, at 888; see also Heck, supra, at 484 , 114 S.Ct. 2364 ; 8 Speiser, supra, § 28:15, at 80. | 1 | 1 |
Mapp v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2006See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). 2006See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Travelers Indemnity Company v. Forrest Coun
green
1 sentence2023If there is a false arrest claim, damages for that claim cover the time of detention up until issuance of process or arraignment, but not more.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Chimel v. California
red
2 sentences2009Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 762-63 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969) (“When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the arresting officer to search the person arrested in order to remove any weapons that the latter might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape. 2009Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 762-63 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969) (“When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the arresting officer to search the person arrested in order to remove any weapons that the latter might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Greene v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2009The Court in Greene held, "the pass/fail result of a PBT is admissible for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause for an arrest at a hearing on a motion to suppress." Greene, 244 S.W.3d at 135 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.