arrest defendant (Maine) · Go Syfert
← Maine issues

arrest defendant in Maine

5 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Forsythgreen
me · 2002 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Probable Cause to Arrest The defendant's argument that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest her fails because "[t]he probable cause standard for requiring a person to take a blood-alcohol test has a very low threshold." State v. Forsyth, 2002 ME 75 , ~ 14, 795 A. 2d 66, 70 (citations omitted) "For there to be probable cause for OUI, an officer only needs evidence sufficient to support the reasonable belief 'that the person's senses are affected to the slightest degree, or to any extent, by alcohol that the person has had to drink.''' !d. (citing State v. Webster, 2000 ME 115 , ~ 7, 754

2010Probable Cause to Arrest The defendant's argument that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest her fails because "[t]he probable cause standard for requiring a person to take a blood-alcohol test has a very low threshold." State v. Forsyth, 2002 ME 75 , ~ 14, 795 A. 2d 66, 70 (citations omitted) "For there to be probable cause for OUI, an officer only needs evidence sufficient to support the reasonable belief 'that the person's senses are affected to the slightest degree, or to any extent, by alcohol that the person has had to drink.''' !d. (citing State v. Webster, 2000 ME 115 , ~ 7, 754

11
Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-Lebrongreen
ca1 · 1995 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004False Arrest (against the Windham Defendants) The elements of a false arrest claim are generally as follows: “(1) the defendant intended to confine the plaintiff; (2) the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement; (3) the plaintiff did not consent to the confinement; and (4) the defendant had no privilege to cause the confinement.” Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-Lebron, 68 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir. 1995) (citing Restatement (Second) Of Torts §§ 35, 118 cmt. b (1965)).

11
State v. Bellinogreen
me · 1978 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982State v. Bellino, Me., 390 A.2d 1014, 1020 (1978).

11
State v. Careygreen
me · 1980 · cited in 1 Maine opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980
2 sentences

1980As we pointed out in State v. Carey, Me., 412 A.2d 1218, 1221 (1980), the legislature's purpose of obtaining reliable evidence concerning sobriety of drivers was enhanced by extending to police officers the power to arrest on probable cause.

1980As we pointed out in State v. Carey, Me., 412 A.2d 1218, 1221 (1980), the legislature’s purpose of obtaining reliable evidence concerning sobriety of drivers was enhanced by extending to police officers the power to arrest on probable cause.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Webster green
me · 2000
2 sentences

2010Probable Cause to Arrest The defendant's argument that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest her fails because "[t]he probable cause standard for requiring a person to take a blood-alcohol test has a very low threshold." State v. Forsyth, 2002 ME 75 , ~ 14, 795 A. 2d 66, 70 (citations omitted) "For there to be probable cause for OUI, an officer only needs evidence sufficient to support the reasonable belief 'that the person's senses are affected to the slightest degree, or to any extent, by alcohol that the person has had to drink.''' !d. (citing State v. Webster, 2000 ME 115 , ~ 7, 754

2010Probable Cause to Arrest The defendant's argument that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest her fails because "[t]he probable cause standard for requiring a person to take a blood-alcohol test has a very low threshold." State v. Forsyth, 2002 ME 75 , ~ 14, 795 A. 2d 66, 70 (citations omitted) "For there to be probable cause for OUI, an officer only needs evidence sufficient to support the reasonable belief 'that the person's senses are affected to the slightest degree, or to any extent, by alcohol that the person has had to drink.''' !d. (citing State v. Webster, 2000 ME 115 , ~ 7, 754

12010–2010
Commonwealth v. Fiume green
pasuperct · 1981
1 sentence

1986The State in this case should “not be permitted to realize the ‘fruits’ of its own lawlessness.” Fiume, 436 A.2d at 1008 .

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

NY 50 (1912–2023) CA 40 (1962–2024) OH 27 (1976–2026) TX 26 (1969–2024) IL 26 (1969–2025) GA 25 (1900–2023) FL 24 (1965–2024) IN 19 (1926–2016) MD 19 (1960–2019) LA 18 (1961–2019) WI 18 (1976–2026) PA 17 (1971–2018) MO 16 (1921–2024) MI 14 (1980–2026) NJ 14 (1964–2026) DC 14 (1982–2023) OR 13 (1962–2024) CT 13 (1989–2024) NM 10 (1980–2025) AR 10 (1980–2026) IA 10 (1917–2024) KY 8 (2006–2026) WA 8 (1915–1999) SC 8 (1901–2020) AL 7 (1986–1995) AZ 7 (1974–2015) MA 7 (1980–2019) VA 6 (1997–2021) CO 6 (1984–2019) TN 5 (2000–2017) WV 5 (1980–2007) OK 5 (1950–1986) AK 5 (1973–2004) ME 5 (1980–2010) NC 4 (1976–2019) ID 4 (1970–1994) MN 4 (1978–2006) VT 3 (1993–2013) HI 3 (1872–1995) MT 3 (1999–2021) SD 3 (1915–2010) RI 2 (2005–2011) PR 2 (1953–1954) NE 2 (1912–2018) DE 2 (2019–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check