Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1936–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCgreen1 sentence2016Indeed, as our Supreme Court expressly recognized in Loweke, a third-party beneficiary claim is a separate and distinct claim under Fultz. 489 Mich at 166-167 (“Thus, because the plaintiff did not claim that she was a third-party beneficiary of the contract between the defendant and the premises owner . . . the plaintiff failed to plead a duty owed to her that was independent, or ‘separate and distinct,’ from the defendant’s contractual duty . . . .”). | 1 | 1 |
Talucci v. Archambaultgreen2 sentences1981See Talucci v Archambault, 20 Mich App 153 ; 173 NW2d 740 (1969). 1981See Talucci v Archambault, 20 Mich App 153 ; 173 NW2d 740 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, Pc
green
2 sentences2017Plaintiff also cites Beaty v Hertzberg & Golden, PC, 456 Mich 247 , 571 NW2d 716 (1997), in support of his third-party beneficiary argument. 2017Plaintiff also cites Beaty v Hertzberg & Golden, PC, 456 Mich 247 , 571 NW2d 716 (1997), in support of his third-party beneficiary argument. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Vushaj v. Farm Bureau General Insurance
green
1 sentence2020However, we “may review an unpreserved issue if it is an issue of law for which all the relevant facts are available.” Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe Insurance
green
1 sentence2009Id. at 424 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Thomson v. Espey Huston & Associates, Inc.
green
1 sentence2008Thomson, supra at 420 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Rogers v. Horvath
green
2 sentences1981Disputing the abandonment of the privity re quirement in the area of liability of professionals, defendants cite Rogers v Horvath, 65 Mich App 644 ; 237 NW2d 595 (1975). 1981Disputing the abandonment of the privity re quirement in the area of liability of professionals, defendants cite Rogers v Horvath, 65 Mich App 644 ; 237 NW2d 595 (1975). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Claxton v. Margolis
neutral
1 sentence1936R. 213), and Claxton v. Margolis, 248 Mich. 199 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Bassett v. American Baptist Publication Society
neutral
1 sentence1936There are exceptions to the third party beneficiary rule as pointed out in Bassett v. American Baptist Publication Society, 215 Mich. 126 (15 A. L. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.