judge committed reversible error in Mississippi

60 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (32)

Case	Followed	Cited
Montgomery v. Stategreen miss · 2004 · cited in 12 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2003–2026 2 sentences 2026We “cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” Smith v. State, 986 So. 2d 290, 295 (¶13) (Miss. 2008) (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (¶33) (Miss. 2004)). 2023“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” Id. (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (¶33) 16 (Miss. 2004)). ¶38.	12	12
Smith v. Stategreen miss · 2008 · cited in 12 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2014–2026 2 sentences 2026We “cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” Smith v. State, 986 So. 2d 290, 295 (¶13) (Miss. 2008) (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (¶33) (Miss. 2004)). 2024See, e.g., Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 292 (Miss. 1992) (“[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds.”); Smith v. State, 986 So. 2d 290, 295 (¶13) (Miss. 2008) (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.”). ¶34.	8	12
Smith v. Stategreen miss · 1998 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2002–2004 2 sentences 2004Montgomery raises this issue for the first time on appeal. "[W]e cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him to consider." Jackson v. State, 856 So.2d 412, 415 (Miss.Ct.App.2003) (quoting Smith v. State, 724 So.2d 280, 313 (Miss.1998)). ¶ 34. 2003Ct. App. 2003) (quoting Smith v. State, 724 So. 2d 280, 313 (Miss. 1998)). ¶ 34.	4	4
Stringer v. Stategreen miss · 1973 · cited in 5 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2022 2 sentences 2022This Court “cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him to consider.” Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (¶33) (Miss. 2004); see also Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973). 2020Tate v. State, 912 So. 2d 919, 928 (Miss. 2005) (“Issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” (citing Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 712 (Miss. 1985))); see also Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (Miss. 2004); Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973))). ¶11.	3	5
Jackson v. Stategreen missctapp · 2003 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2003–2014 2 sentences 2014This Court “cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him to consider.” Id. 2014In Rubenstein v. State, 941 So.2d 735, 761 (¶ 90) (Miss.2006), the court held that “issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” See also Jackson v. State, 856 So.2d 412, 415 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2003) (“As an appellate court, we cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him to consider.”). ¶ 19.	3	4
American Fire Protection, Inc. v. Lewisgreen miss · 1995 · cited in 3 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1991–1996 2 sentences 1996American Fire Protection, Inc. v. Lewis, 653 So.2d 1387, 1390 (Miss. 1995). 1994American Fire Protection, Inc. v. Lewis, 653 So. 2d 1387, 1390 (Miss. 1995).	3	3
Wilcher v. Stategreen miss · 1985 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020Tate v. State, 912 So. 2d 919, 928 (Miss. 2005) (“Issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” (citing Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 712 (Miss. 1985))); see also Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (Miss. 2004); Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973))). ¶11. 2020Tate v. State, 912 So. 2d 919, 928 (Miss. 2005) (“Issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” (citing Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 712 (Miss. 1985))); see also Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (Miss. 2004); Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973))). ¶11.	2	2
Tate v. Stategreen miss · 2005 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020Tate v. State, 912 So. 2d 919, 928 (Miss. 2005) (“Issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” (citing Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 712 (Miss. 1985))); see also Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (Miss. 2004); Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973))). ¶11. 2020Tate v. State, 912 So. 2d 919, 928 (Miss. 2005) (“Issues not brought before the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.” (citing Wilcher v. State, 479 So. 2d 710, 712 (Miss. 1985))); see also Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.” (citing Montgomery v. State, 891 So. 2d 179, 187 (Miss. 2004); Stringer v. State, 279 So. 2d 156, 158 (Miss. 1973))). ¶11.	2	2
Conner v. Statered miss · 1994 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006 2 sentences 2006Montgomery v. State, 891 So.2d 179, 187 (Miss.2004). "[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds." Doss v. State, 709 So.2d at 379 (quoting Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1255 (Miss.1993)). ś 50. 2006Montgomery v. State, 891 So.2d 179, 187 (Miss.2004). “[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds.” Doss v. State, 709 So.2d at 379 (quoting Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1255 (Miss.1993)). ¶ 50.	2	2
Lee v. Stategreen miss · 1988 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2000–2003 2 sentences 2003Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 174-75 (Miss.1990); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss.1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So.2d 334, 338 (Miss.1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error. 2000Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So. 2d 171, 174-77 (Miss. 1989); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss. 1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So. 2d 334, 338 (Miss. 1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error.	2	2
Barr v. Stategreen miss · 1978 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2000–2003 2 sentences 2003Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 174-75 (Miss.1990); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss.1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So.2d 334, 338 (Miss.1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error. 2000Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So. 2d 171, 174-77 (Miss. 1989); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss. 1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So. 2d 334, 338 (Miss. 1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error.	2	2
Wheeler v. Stategreen miss · 1990 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2000–2003 2 sentences 2003Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 174-75 (Miss.1990); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss.1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So.2d 334, 338 (Miss.1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error. 2000Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So. 2d 171, 174-77 (Miss. 1989); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss. 1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So. 2d 334, 338 (Miss. 1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error.	2	2
Petti v. Stategreen miss · 1995 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1998–2001 2 sentences 2001We addressed this exact instruction in Petti v. State, 666 So.2d 754, 756-57 (Miss.1995). 1998We addressed this exact instruction in Petti v. State, 666 So.2d 754, 756-57 (Miss. 1995).	2	2
West v. Stategreen miss · 1985 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1997–2000 2 sentences 2000"The trial court has broad discretion in allowing or disallowing redirect examination of witnesses." West v. State, 463 So.2d 1048, 1055 (Miss.1985). 1997"The trial court has broad discretion in allowing or disallowing redirect examination of witnesses." West v. State, 463 So.2d 1048, 1055 (Miss.1985).	2	2
Morgan v. Illinoisgreen scotus · 1992 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 2 sentences 1995Russell suggests that Bond would always vote for the death penalty and therefore, 826 he should have been excluded under Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992). 1995Russell suggests that Bond would always vote for the death penalty and therefore, 826 he should have been excluded under Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct. 2222 , 119 L.Ed.2d 492 (1992).	1	2
Fleming v. Stategreen miss · 1992 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024See, e.g., Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 292 (Miss. 1992) (“[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds.”); Smith v. State, 986 So. 2d 290, 295 (¶13) (Miss. 2008) (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.”). ¶34.	1	1
Curtis Aaron White v. State of Mississippigreen missctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 1 sentence 2020However, the lead opinion in White2 concluded “the circuit court abused its discretion in admitting . . . highly prejudicial and minimally probative nine-year-old, uncharged statutory-rape evidence.” White, 228 So. 3d at 902 (¶22).	1	1
Brent v. Stategreen missctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 1 sentence 2019In Brent, 929 So. 2d at 954 (¶3), the supreme court examined whether the trial judge committed reversible error by denying the appellant’s motion to recuse.	1	1
Payton v. Stategreen miss · 2017 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Smith , 986 So.2d at 295 (¶ 13) ("This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider."); Graves v. State , 216 So.3d 1152 , 1159 (¶ 15) (Miss. 2016) ("A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that she] invited or induced." (quoting Galloway v. State , 122 So.3d 614 , 645 (¶ 87) (Miss. 2013) ). 2018See, e.g., Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (¶13) (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.”); Graves v. State, 216 So. 3d 1152, 1159 (¶15) (Miss. 2016) (“A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that she] invited or induced.” (quoting Galloway v. State, 122 So. 3d 614, 645 (¶87) (Miss. 2013)). 24 VII.	1	1
Galloway v. Stategreen · 2013 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See, e.g. , Smith , 986 So.2d at 295 (¶ 13) ("This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider."); Graves v. State , 216 So.3d 1152 , 1159 (¶ 15) (Miss. 2016) ("A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that she] invited or induced." (quoting Galloway v. State , 122 So.3d 614 , 645 (¶ 87) (Miss. 2013) ). 2018See, e.g., Smith, 986 So. 2d at 295 (¶13) (“This Court cannot find that a trial judge committed reversible error on a matter not brought before him or her to consider.”); Graves v. State, 216 So. 3d 1152, 1159 (¶15) (Miss. 2016) (“A defendant cannot complain on appeal of alleged errors [that she] invited or induced.” (quoting Galloway v. State, 122 So. 3d 614, 645 (¶87) (Miss. 2013)). 24 VII.	1	1
Ferguson v. Stategreen miss · 2014 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	1
Marvin Kirk v. State of Mississippigreen miss · 2015 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	1
Davis v. Stategreen miss · 1996 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015	1	1
State v. Tisongreen ariz · 1984 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015	1	1
Jefferson v. Stategreen miss · 2002 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015	1	1
Jeremy Cage v. State of Mississippigreen miss · 2014 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015	1	1
Rubenstein v. Stategreen miss · 2006 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	1	1
Gray v. Stategreen miss · 1977 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995	1	1
Keyes v. Stategreen miss · 1975 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988	1	1
Franklin Cty. Co-Op. v. MFC SERVICES (AAL)green miss · 1983 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988	1	1
Acevedo v. Stategreen miss · 1985 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988	1	1
Harper v. Stategreen miss · 1985 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

Case	Cited	Years
King v. State green miss · 2001 2 sentences 2007King v. State, 784 So.2d 884 (Miss.2001). 2007King v. State, 784 So.2d 884 (Miss.2001).	3	2003–2007
Cabello v. State green miss · 1986 2 sentences 2000Davis argues that the evidence was highly prejudicial and not probative on any relevant issue citing Cabello v. State, 490 So.2d 852 (Miss. 1986) (evidence of crimes other than the one for which the accused is on trial is not admissible in a criminal prosecution). 1997Davis argues that the evidence was highly prejudicial and not probative on any relevant issue citing Cabello v. State, 490 So.2d 852 (Miss. 1986) (evidence of crimes other than the one for which the accused is on trial is not admissible in a criminal prosecution).	3	1997–2000
United States v. Demasco Ramon Diaz, A/K/A Pipo green ca5 · 1978 2 sentences 1999Id. 1996Id.	3	1991–1999
Doss v. State green miss · 1997 2 sentences 2006Montgomery v. State, 891 So.2d 179, 187 (Miss.2004). "[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds." Doss v. State, 709 So.2d at 379 (quoting Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1255 (Miss.1993)). ś 50. 2006Montgomery v. State, 891 So.2d 179, 187 (Miss.2004). “[A]n objection on one or more specific grounds constitutes a waiver of all other grounds.” Doss v. State, 709 So.2d at 379 (quoting Conner v. State, 632 So.2d 1239, 1255 (Miss.1993)). ¶ 50.	2	2006–2006
Groseclose v. State green miss · 1983 2 sentences 2003Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171, 174-75 (Miss.1990); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss.1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So.2d 334, 338 (Miss.1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error. 2000Furthermore, she cites Wheeler v. State, 560 So. 2d 171, 174-77 (Miss. 1989); Lee v. State, 529 So.2d 181, 183 (Miss. 1988); Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297 (Miss. 1983); and Barr v. State, 359 So. 2d 334, 338 (Miss. 1978), to instruct the Court that a jury should be fully and fairly instructed or the trial court has committed reversible error.	2	2000–2003
Mickell v. State green miss · 1999 2 sentences 2001In Mickell v. State, 735 So.2d 1031 (Miss.1999), we found that the trial judge committed reversible error in his answer to a jury inquiry. 1999In Mickell v. State, 735 So. 2d 1031 (Miss. 1999), we found that the trial judge committed reversible error in his answer to a jury inquiry.	2	1999–2001
Evans v. State green miss · 1973 1 sentence 2018Thus, in Evans v. State , 275 So.2d 83 (Miss. 1973), the Supreme Court held that the defendant "effectively waived" any claim that his arrest was illegal when, as in this case, his only argument at trial was that his confession was involuntary.	1	2018–2018
Howard v. State green miss · 1997 1 sentence 2017On appeal, Hutto argues his actions are similar to those of the defendant in Howard v. State, 701 So.2d 274 (Miss. 1997), and that the trial judge committed reversible error by failing to order, sua sponte, that Hutto undergo another mental evaluation.	1	2017–2017
Miranda v. Arizona green scotus · 1966 2 sentences 2017Pinter argues that his confession should have been excluded’ because the State failed to prove that the confession was voluntary or obtained in compliance with Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 2017Pinter argues that his confession should have been excluded’ because the State failed to prove that the confession was voluntary or obtained in compliance with Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).	1	2017–2017
White v. State green miss · 2001 1 sentence 2016In White v. State, 785 So.2d 1059 (Miss.2001), our Supreme Court made clear that, under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1), a defendant is entitled to “full impeachment of prosecution witnesses” through proof of prior felony convictions.	1	2016–2016
Tison v. Arizona green scotus · 1987	1	2015–2015
Woods v. State green missctapp · 2007	1	2009–2009
Johnson v. State green miss · 2005	1	2009–2009
Bayse v. State green miss · 1982	1	1996–1996
Draughn v. Lewis neutral miss · 1964	1	1995–1995
Colonial Mortg. Co., Inc. v. Lee green miss · 1988	1	1995–1995
Cabello v. State green miss · 1985	1	1995–1995
Wainwright v. Witt green scotus · 1985	1	1995–1995

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-19 (12) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-101 (9) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 99-15-35 (7) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-105 (7) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 99-17-35 (5) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (4) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 11-1-55 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-1 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-77 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 19-25-69 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-7 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-39 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MS 60 (1987–2026) MA 47 (1977–2025) LA 30 (1950–2007) FL 27 (1953–2007) MD 23 (1976–2020) GA 21 (1939–2016) IL 19 (1968–2021) AL 19 (1970–2012) NJ 17 (1963–2022) DC 16 (1987–2017) SC 15 (1969–2010) NY 14 (1940–2014) TX 13 (1923–2001) TN 12 (1960–2010) MI 11 (1960–2016) PA 9 (1957–2024) VA 8 (1990–2018) KY 8 (1972–2010) DE 6 (1980–2025) NV 5 (2015–2015) NC 5 (1968–1994) CA 4 (1953–1985) OK 4 (1962–1987) OH 3 (1940–2005) IN 3 (1965–1982) UT 3 (1985–2025) OR 3 (1978–2014) WV 2 (1973–1988) MO 2 (2005–2005) CO 2 (2018–2018) AZ 2 (1980–1989) NH 2 (1983–1983)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check