Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hanifa v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Defendant Hanifa contended that the trial judge committed reversible error when the judge suspended the State's closing argument, left the bench, and returned some time later, informing counsel and their clients that the judge had been to “visit with the jury” whose condition the judge described as “fragile.” Id. at 806 (6). 2015Defendant Hanifa contended that the trial judge committed reversible error when the judge suspended the State’s closing argument, left the bench, and returned some time later, informing counsel and their clients that the judge had been to “visit with the jury” whose condition the judge described as “fragile.” Id. at 806 (6). | 2 | 2 |
Lavender v. Stategreen2 sentences1994See Lavender v. State, 234 Ga. 608 ( 216 SE2d 855 ) (1975). 1994See Lavender v. State, 234 Ga. 608 ( 216 SE2d 855 ) (1975). | 2 | 2 |
Ellicott v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See, e.g., Ellicott v. State, 320 *667 Ga. App. 729, 734-735 ( 740 SE2d 716 ) (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Byrd v. Stategreen2 sentences2000We rejected this argument in Byrd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 485, 488-489 (6) (c) ( 512 SE2d 372 ) (1999), holding: Even if the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings on the record that each of the elements enunciated in Williams for admission of the evidence was satisfied, no harmful error occurred because . . . the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to have concluded that the Williams’ requirements were satisfied. 2000We rejected this argument in Byrd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 485, 488-489 (6) (c) ( 512 SE2d 372 ) (1999), holding: Even if the trial court erred by failing to make specific findings on the record that each of the elements enunciated in Williams for admission of the evidence was satisfied, no harmful error occurred because . . . the evidence was sufficient for the trial court to have concluded that the Williams’ requirements were satisfied. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2000The lapse of time in the case sub judice is far shorter and provides no basis for reversing the trial court’s ruling. (b) Johnson contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by failing to make an affirmative determination on the record that the independent offense was admitted for some lawful purpose other than to place his character into evidence, as required by Williams, supra, 261 Ga. at 642 (2) (b). | 1 | 1 |
Howard v. Renfroegreen2 sentences1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). 1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). | 1 | 1 |
Pittman v. U. S. Shelter Corp.green2 sentences1980Pittman v. U.S. Shelter Corp., 150 Ga. App. 37, 38 ( 256 SE2d 646 ). 1980Pittman v. U.S. Shelter Corp., 150 Ga. App. 37, 38 ( 256 SE2d 646 ). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1 |
Faust v. Stategreen2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Dillon v. Sillsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Lautenschlagergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Manchester v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Garrett v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Simmons v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Phelps v. State
green
2 sentences1998Kelley v. State, 201 Ga. App. 343 (3) ( 411 SE2d 276 ) (1991) (setting aside conviction for burglary with the intent to commit rape due to trial court’s failure to charge jury on underlying offense of rape); Phelps v. State, 192 Ga. App. 193 (1) ( 384 SE2d 260 ) (1989) (reversing conviction of burglary with intent to commit rape where court failed to charge the jury on the underlying offense of rape). 1998Kelley v. State, 201 Ga. App. 343 (3) ( 411 SE2d 276 ) (1991) (setting aside conviction for burglary with the intent to commit rape due to trial court’s failure to charge jury on underlying offense of rape); Phelps v. State, 192 Ga. App. 193 (1) ( 384 SE2d 260 ) (1989) (reversing conviction of burglary with intent to commit rape where court failed to charge the jury on the underlying offense of rape). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Kelley v. State
green
2 sentences1998Kelley v. State, 201 Ga. App. 343 (3) ( 411 SE2d 276 ) (1991) (setting aside conviction for burglary with the intent to commit rape due to trial court’s failure to charge jury on underlying offense of rape); Phelps v. State, 192 Ga. App. 193 (1) ( 384 SE2d 260 ) (1989) (reversing conviction of burglary with intent to commit rape where court failed to charge the jury on the underlying offense of rape). 1998Kelley v. State, 201 Ga. App. 343 (3) ( 411 SE2d 276 ) (1991) (setting aside conviction for burglary with the intent to commit rape due to trial court’s failure to charge jury on underlying offense of rape); Phelps v. State, 192 Ga. App. 193 (1) ( 384 SE2d 260 ) (1989) (reversing conviction of burglary with intent to commit rape where court failed to charge the jury on the underlying offense of rape). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Walker v. Bishop
green
2 sentences1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). 1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Walkley v. Dukes
green
2 sentences1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). 1988While *120 “[s]ome matter is so inflammatory that its effect cannot be removed, and a mistrial must be granted,” Howard v. Renfroe, 93 Ga. App. 59, 62 ( 90 SE2d 598 ), it is the general rule that “[t]he exercise of the trial court’s discretion in granting or denying a mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal absent [manifest] abuse.” Walkley v. Dukes, 175 Ga. App. 820 (2) ( 334 SE2d 868 ); Walker v. Bishop, 169 Ga. App. 236 (8) ( 312 SE2d 349 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Douthit v. State
green
2 sentences1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. 1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Porter v. State
green
2 sentences1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. 1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Smith v. Hopper
green
2 sentences1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. 1978This contention was considered and rejected in Porter v. State, 237 Ga. 580 ( 229 SE2d 384 ) (1976); Douthit v. State, 239 Ga. 81 ( 235 SE2d 493 ) (1977); Smith v. Hopper, 240 Ga. 93 ( 239 SE2d 510 ) (1977); and Corn v. State, supra. 3. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Jefferson v. State
green
2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Hubbard v. State
green
2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Godwin v. State
green
2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Jenkins v. State
green
2 sentences1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). 1976See the following authorities which leave it beyond doubt that the trial judge committed reversible error in this conduct: Pound v. State, 43 Ga. 89 , 90 (7); Jefferson v. State, 80 Ga. 16 ( 5 SE 293 ); Hubbard v. State, 108 Ga. 786 ( 33 SE 814 ); Jenkins v. State, 123 Ga. 523 ( 51 SE 598 ); Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. 416, 419-420 ( 47 SE2d 54 ); Faust v. State, 222 Ga. 27, 28 (1), 29 (2) ( 148 SE2d 430 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Bradley v. State
neutral
2 sentences1975The defendant relies on Bradley v. State, 232 Ga. 58 ( 205 SE2d 204 ) (1974), but that case found reversible error in not charging on circumstantial evidence in the first instance. 1975The defendant relies on Bradley v. State, 232 Ga. 58 ( 205 SE2d 204 ) (1974), but that case found reversible error in not charging on circumstantial evidence in the first instance. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Langston v. State
green
1 sentence1952The case of Langston v. State, 109 Ga. 153 ( 35 S. E. 166 ) is not like the case at bar and the ruling there made is not controlling here. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1952The case of Langston v. State, 109 Ga. 153 ( 35 S. E. 166 ) is not like the case at bar and the ruling there made is not controlling here. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Pryor v. Coggin
green
1 sentence1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Freeman v. Hamilton
neutral
1 sentence1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
| Lanier v. Huguley green | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Martin v. Green
green
1 sentence1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
| Garner v. Wood green | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Morrison v. Westbrook
neutral
1 sentence1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Cadwell v. Phillips
green
1 sentence1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Turner v. Warren
green
2 sentences1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). 1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Foster v. Mason
neutral
2 sentences1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). 1950In support of this position the plaintiff in error cites these cases: Pryor v. Coggin, 17 Ga. 444 (1); Freeman v. Hamilton, 74 Ga. 317 ; Lanier v. Huguley, 91 Ga. 791 ( 18 S. E. 39 ); Garner v. Wood, 188 Ga. 463 ( 4 S. E. 2d, 137 ); Turner v. Warren, 193 Ga. 455 (5) ( 18 S. E. 2d, 865 ); Morrison v. Westbrook, 41 Ga. App. 201 ( 152 S. E. 585 ); Foster v. Mason, 66 Ga. App. 222 ( 17 S. E. 2d, 763 ). | 1 | 1950–1950 |
| Baker v. Hodges neutral | 1 | 1946–1946 |
| Sample v. Lipscomb green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Gilmer v. City of Atlanta green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Patterson v. State green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Adkins v. Flagg green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Georgia Power Co. v. Puckett green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Hicks v. State green | 1 | 1945–1945 |
| Moughon v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Smith v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Young v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Phillips v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Thompson v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hixon green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| McDonald v. State green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Ramsey-Fender Motor Co. v. Chapman green | 1 | 1941–1941 |
| Georgia R. R. & Banking Co. v. Keating neutral | 1 | 1939–1939 |
| City of Waycross v. Howard green | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.