principles waiver (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

principles waiver in Oklahoma

8 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1900–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Ford v. Board of Tax-Roll Correctionsgreen
okla · 1967 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Id. at ¶ 21, 431 P.2d at 428 (citation omitted).

2014Id. at ¶ 21, 431 P.2d at 428 (citation omitted).

22
Sollenberger v. AA CONSTRUCTION COMPANYgreen
coloctapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Id. at 1 21, 481 P.2d at 428 (citation omitted).

2014Id. at 1 21, 481 P.2d at 428 (citation omitted).

11
Estate of Davisgreen
calctapp · 1940 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973
2 sentences

1973The principle is known as the doctrine of acquiescence, often referred to as quasi estoppel.’ In re Estate of Davis, 1940, 38 Cal.App.2d 579, 584, 585 , 101 P.2d 761, 763 , 102 P.2d 545 .” The above principles of waiver and es-toppel by consent are the same ones this Court applied in Wallace v. Wallace, Okl., 490 P.2d 749 , when it reversed the trial court and held where a divorced wife agreed with her former husband on changes in the alimony payments prescribed in the couple’s previously entered *1101 divorce decree and both parties joined in an application to the District Court to approve sa

1973The principle is known as the doctrine of acquiescence, often referred to as quasi estoppel.’ In re Estate of Davis, 1940, 38 Cal.App.2d 579, 584, 585 , 101 P.2d 761, 763 , 102 P.2d 545 .” The above principles of waiver and es-toppel by consent are the same ones this Court applied in Wallace v. Wallace, Okl., 490 P.2d 749 , when it reversed the trial court and held where a divorced wife agreed with her former husband on changes in the alimony payments prescribed in the couple’s previously entered *1101 divorce decree and both parties joined in an application to the District Court to approve sa

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
VANDELAY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. FALLIN green
okla · 2014
1 sentence

2015Id. (emphasis added). ¶6 The Vandelay Court addressed one of the principles recognized in Ford , stating: In Ford , this Court concluded the "powers properly belonging" to a branch of government were those "which [are] essential to the existence, dignity and functions [of the branch] " and include inherent powers .

12015–2015
Wallace v. Wallace neutral
okla · 1971
1 sentence

1973The principle is known as the doctrine of acquiescence, often referred to as quasi estoppel.’ In re Estate of Davis, 1940, 38 Cal.App.2d 579, 584, 585 , 101 P.2d 761, 763 , 102 P.2d 545 .” The above principles of waiver and es-toppel by consent are the same ones this Court applied in Wallace v. Wallace, Okl., 490 P.2d 749 , when it reversed the trial court and held where a divorced wife agreed with her former husband on changes in the alimony payments prescribed in the couple’s previously entered *1101 divorce decree and both parties joined in an application to the District Court to approve sa

11973–1973
Pettis v. Johnston green
okla · 1920
2 sentences

1973In neither Kunc v. Kunc, 186 Okl. 297 , 97 P.2d 771 , nor in any of the cases cited by defendant, such as Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 , were issues of estoppel or waiver dealt with.

1973In neither Kunc v. Kunc, 186 Okl. 297 , 97 P.2d 771 , nor in any of the cases cited by defendant, such as Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 , were issues of estoppel or waiver dealt with.

11973–1973
Kunc v. Kunc green
okla · 1939
2 sentences

1973In neither Kunc v. Kunc, 186 Okl. 297 , 97 P.2d 771 , nor in any of the cases cited by defendant, such as Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 , were issues of estoppel or waiver dealt with.

1973In neither Kunc v. Kunc, 186 Okl. 297 , 97 P.2d 771 , nor in any of the cases cited by defendant, such as Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okl. 277 , 190 P. 681 , were issues of estoppel or waiver dealt with.

11973–1973
Owen v. Miller neutral
okla · 1942
1 sentence

1952As recently applied by this court in the case of Owen v. Miller, 190 Okla. *686 205, 122 P. 2d 140 , it was expressed in the following words: “1.

11952–1952
Standley v. Cruce neutral
okla · 1916
2 sentences

1937Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 P. 373 ; Standley v. Cruce, 57 Okla. 127 , 157 P. 135 ; Spaulding v. Thompson, 60 Okla. 136 , 159 P. 509 .

1937Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 P. 373 ; Standley v. Cruce, 57 Okla. 127 , 157 P. 135 ; Spaulding v. Thompson, 60 Okla. 136 , 159 P. 509 .

11937–1937
Jones v. Citizens' State Bank neutral
okla · 1913
2 sentences

1937Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 P. 373 ; Standley v. Cruce, 57 Okla. 127 , 157 P. 135 ; Spaulding v. Thompson, 60 Okla. 136 , 159 P. 509 .

1937Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 P. 373 ; Standley v. Cruce, 57 Okla. 127 , 157 P. 135 ; Spaulding v. Thompson, 60 Okla. 136 , 159 P. 509 .

11937–1937
Spaulding v. Thompson neutral
okla · 1916
1 sentence

1937Jones v. Citizens’ State Bank, 39 Okla. 393 , 135 P. 373 ; Standley v. Cruce, 57 Okla. 127 , 157 P. 135 ; Spaulding v. Thompson, 60 Okla. 136 , 159 P. 509 .

11937–1937
Silva v. State neutral
oklacrimapp · 1911
1 sentence

1923Some of these are Silva v. State, 6 Okla.

11923–1923
Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. Town of Solon green
ny · 1893
1 sentence

1900Bank v. Town of Solan, 32 N. E. 1058 .) We think that the principles or doctrine laid down by the New York Court of Appeals in that case will apply with equal force to this case.

11900–1900

Where else courts name it

IL 117 (1958–2026) CA 51 (1895–2026) PA 33 (1839–2025) MD 22 (1909–2020) MO 21 (1890–2024) NY 21 (1859–2018) NJ 18 (1945–2023) GA 17 (1939–2015) TX 17 (1910–2026) NC 16 (1994–2022) IA 16 (1939–2026) MN 15 (1987–2025) WI 14 (1975–2019) OH 14 (2005–2024) CT 11 (1972–2016) MI 11 (1983–2023) TN 11 (1905–2015) FL 10 (1962–2016) WV 10 (1903–2026) AL 9 (1940–2008) VT 8 (1972–2026) VA 8 (1966–2020) OK 8 (1900–2015) MS 7 (1895–2025) ID 6 (1983–2025) OR 6 (1977–2025) MA 6 (1937–2025) KS 5 (1925–2021) WA 5 (1972–2020) UT 5 (1996–2024) LA 5 (1998–2025) RI 4 (1960–2004) DE 4 (1939–2015) NM 3 (2009–2024) WY 3 (1988–1997) IN 3 (1898–2014) CO 3 (1947–2025) AZ 3 (2010–2025) SD 3 (1957–2007) DC 3 (1979–2012) NV 3 (2009–2021) MT 3 (1927–2008) KY 2 (1965–2025) AR 2 (1909–2012) ME 2 (1973–2020) HI 2 (1946–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check