principles doctrine (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

principles doctrine in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks v. United Statesgreen
ca9 · 1969 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2006–2012
2 sentences

2012See, e.g., Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968) (evidence obtained in the Philippines in violation of the Fourth Amendment by foreign agents was admissible in federal court when the federal officers did not undertake or unlawfully participate in the unconstitutional search and seizure).

2006See, e.g., Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968) (evidence obtained in the Philippines in violation of the Fourth Amendment by foreign agents was admissible in federal court when the federal officers did not undertake or unlawfully participate in the unconstitutional search and seizure).

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Wilkening v. State green
wash · 1959
2 sentences

2020Wilkening v. State, 54 Wn.2d 692, 698 , 344 P.2d 204 (1959).

2020Wilkening v. State, 54 Wn.2d 692, 698 , 344 P.2d 204 (1959).

12020–2020
Terry v. Ohio green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1972The principles of the doctrine were recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.

1972The principles of the doctrine were recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L.

11972–1972

Where else courts name it

IL 117 (1958–2026) CA 51 (1895–2026) PA 33 (1839–2025) MD 22 (1909–2020) MO 21 (1890–2024) NY 21 (1859–2018) NJ 18 (1945–2023) GA 17 (1939–2015) TX 17 (1910–2026) NC 16 (1994–2022) IA 16 (1939–2026) MN 15 (1987–2025) WI 14 (1975–2019) OH 14 (2005–2024) CT 11 (1972–2016) MI 11 (1983–2023) TN 11 (1905–2015) FL 10 (1962–2016) WV 10 (1903–2026) AL 9 (1940–2008) VT 8 (1972–2026) VA 8 (1966–2020) OK 8 (1900–2015) MS 7 (1895–2025) ID 6 (1983–2025) OR 6 (1977–2025) MA 6 (1937–2025) KS 5 (1925–2021) WA 5 (1972–2020) UT 5 (1996–2024) LA 5 (1998–2025) RI 4 (1960–2004) DE 4 (1939–2015) NM 3 (2009–2024) WY 3 (1988–1997) IN 3 (1898–2014) CO 3 (1947–2025) AZ 3 (2010–2025) SD 3 (1957–2007) DC 3 (1979–2012) NV 3 (2009–2021) MT 3 (1927–2008) KY 2 (1965–2025) AR 2 (1909–2012) ME 2 (1973–2020) HI 2 (1946–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check