principles test (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

principles test in Connecticut

11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Purzycki v. Town of Fairfieldgreen
conn · 1998 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See, e.g., Purzycki v. Fairfield, 244 Conn. 101, 110 , 708 A.2d 937 (1998) (con- cluding that second grade student’s unsupervised use of school hallway during recess constituted imminent harm because it was limited to specific time period and geographical area, namely, ‘‘the one-half hour interval when . . . students were dismissed from the lunch- room to traverse [unsupervised school hallways]’’), overruled in part by Haynes v. Middletown, 314 Conn. 303 , 101 A.3d 249 (2014).

2016See, e.g., Purzycki v. Fairfield, 244 Conn. 101, 110 , 708 A.2d 937 (1998) (con- cluding that second grade student’s unsupervised use of school hallway during recess constituted imminent harm because it was limited to specific time period and geographical area, namely, ‘‘the one-half hour interval when . . . students were dismissed from the lunch- room to traverse [unsupervised school hallways]’’), overruled in part by Haynes v. Middletown, 314 Conn. 303 , 101 A.3d 249 (2014).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Spinelli v. United States red
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1985Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 415 , 89 S. Ct. 584 , 21 L.

1985Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 415 , 89 S. Ct. 584 , 21 L.

41972–1985
Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett green
scotus · 2001
2 sentences

2008Instead, the trial court stated at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment that it would take the plaintiffs substantive response to the defendant’s motion into account in its ruling. 8 Under the ADA, a qualified individual with a disability is one who is capable of performing the essential functions of the desired job with or without reasonable accommodation. 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (8). 9 Although this case is not an administrative appeal from an agency decision, we see no reason why the same principles of analysis should not apply here when addressing the construction of a statute by the a

2008Instead, the trial court stated at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment that it would take the plaintiffs substantive response to the defendant’s motion into account in its ruling. 8 Under the ADA, a qualified individual with a disability is one who is capable of performing the essential functions of the desired job with or without reasonable accommodation. 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (8). 9 Although this case is not an administrative appeal from an agency decision, we see no reason why the same principles of analysis should not apply here when addressing the construction of a statute by the a

12008–2008
Miller v. Commissioner of Correction green
conn · 1997
1 sentence

2007N o case has yet decided whether the principles as to the standard of proof of Miller v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 242 Conn. 745 , are applicable to a violation of probation hearing, which is not a criminal proceeding.

12007–2007
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2004For the applicable principles of claim preclusion and issue preclusion, see, e.g., Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Groton, 262 Conn. 45 , 57-58 n.16, 808 A.2d 1107 (2002); 1 Restatement (Second) Judgments §§ 24, 27 (1982).

2004For the applicable principles of claim preclusion and issue preclusion, see, e.g., Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Groton, 262 Conn. 45 , 57-58 n.16, 808 A.2d 1107 (2002); 1 Restatement (Second) Judgments §§ 24, 27 (1982).

12004–2004
Connecticut National Bank v. Douglas green
conn · 1992
1 sentence

2001Connecticut National Bank v. Douglas , 221 Conn. 530 , 536 (1992).

12001–2001
Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America green
conn · 1964
1 sentence

1994Co. , 152 Conn. 249 , 254 (1964) remain appropriate as concerns the intent of the parties as to the general matter of Choice of law.

11994–1994
State v. Grayton green
conn · 1972
2 sentences

1973“The principles by which we test the adequacy of an affidavit have been designed to insure that a disinterested judicial officer make his own common-sense judgment that there is probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.” State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 106 , 302 A.2d 246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1045 , 93 S. Ct. 542 , 34 L.

1973“The principles by which we test the adequacy of an affidavit have been designed to insure that a disinterested judicial officer make his own common-sense judgment that there is probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.” State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 106 , 302 A.2d 246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1045 , 93 S. Ct. 542 , 34 L.

11973–1973
Aguilar v. Texas red
scotus · 1964
2 sentences

1973Ed. 2d 495 ; Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 110-11 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L.

1973Ed. 2d 495 ; Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 110-11 , 84 S. Ct. 1509 , 12 L.

11973–1973
Starnes v. Harris green
scotus · 1972
1 sentence

1973“The principles by which we test the adequacy of an affidavit have been designed to insure that a disinterested judicial officer make his own common-sense judgment that there is probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.” State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 106 , 302 A.2d 246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1045 , 93 S. Ct. 542 , 34 L.

11973–1973
Grayton v. Connecticut green
scotus · 1972
1 sentence

1973“The principles by which we test the adequacy of an affidavit have been designed to insure that a disinterested judicial officer make his own common-sense judgment that there is probable cause for the issuance of the warrant.” State v. Grayton, 163 Conn. 104, 106 , 302 A.2d 246 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1045 , 93 S. Ct. 542 , 34 L.

11973–1973

Where else courts name it

IL 117 (1958–2026) CA 51 (1895–2026) PA 33 (1839–2025) MD 22 (1909–2020) MO 21 (1890–2024) NY 21 (1859–2018) NJ 18 (1945–2023) GA 17 (1939–2015) TX 17 (1910–2026) NC 16 (1994–2022) IA 16 (1939–2026) MN 15 (1987–2025) WI 14 (1975–2019) OH 14 (2005–2024) CT 11 (1972–2016) MI 11 (1983–2023) TN 11 (1905–2015) FL 10 (1962–2016) WV 10 (1903–2026) AL 9 (1940–2008) VT 8 (1972–2026) VA 8 (1966–2020) OK 8 (1900–2015) MS 7 (1895–2025) ID 6 (1983–2025) OR 6 (1977–2025) MA 6 (1937–2025) KS 5 (1925–2021) WA 5 (1972–2020) UT 5 (1996–2024) LA 5 (1998–2025) RI 4 (1960–2004) DE 4 (1939–2015) NM 3 (2009–2024) WY 3 (1988–1997) IN 3 (1898–2014) CO 3 (1947–2025) AZ 3 (2010–2025) SD 3 (1957–2007) DC 3 (1979–2012) NV 3 (2009–2021) MT 3 (1927–2008) KY 2 (1965–2025) AR 2 (1909–2012) ME 2 (1973–2020) HI 2 (1946–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check