Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Houston v. Kilburngreen2 sentences2002See City of Houston v. Kilburn , 849 S.W.2d 810, 812 (Tex. 1993) (holding that court of appeals did not have jurisdiction because "city employee never asserted the affirmative defense of qualified immunity, nor filed his own motion for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity"); Austin Indep. 2002See City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849 S.W.2d 810, 812 (Tex.1993) (holding that court of appeals did not have jurisdiction because “city employee never asserted the affirmative defense of qualified immunity, nor filed his own motion for summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity”); Austin Indep. | 2 | 2 |
Shah v. Mossgreen2 sentences2008See Shaw v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001). 2003Shah , 67 S.W.3d at 842 . | 1 | 2 |
Stanton v. Simsgreen2 sentences2015And, in Stanton v. Sims, 134 S.Ct. 3 (2013), a civil rights case involving an issue of qualified immunity for a pursuing police officer, the Supreme Court held that Welsh did not purport to apply in the context of the so-called “hot pursuit” exception to the warrant requirement, and does not unequivocally stand for the proposition that an officer cannot enter the curtilage of a home without a warrant when he is in hot pursuit of a “jailable misdemeanor” offender. 2015Id. at 4, 6 . | 1 | 1 |
Free v. American Home Assurance Co.green1 sentence1995Free, 902 S.W.2d at 55-56 (show statement made with malice); Reeves v. Western Co., 867 S.W.2d 385, 394 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1993, no writ) (show statement made to those outside interest group). | 1 | 1 |
Reeves v. Western Co. of North Americagreen1 sentence1995Free, 902 S.W.2d at 55-56 (show statement made with malice); Reeves v. Western Co., 867 S.W.2d 385, 394 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1993, no writ) (show statement made to those outside interest group). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pritchett v. Alford
green
1 sentence2000Pritchett, 973 F.2d at 313 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Crawford-El v. Britton
green
2 sentences1999Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574 , 118 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 , 140 L.Ed.2d 759 (1998). 1999Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574 , 118 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 , 140 L.Ed.2d 759 (1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.