7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1985–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kmart Corp. v. Bassettgreen2 sentences2001See Kmart Corp. v. Bassett , 769 So.2d 282 , 284 n. 1 (Ala. 2000). 2001See Kmart Corp. v. Bassett , 769 So.2d 282 , 284 n. 1 (Ala. 2000)." 790 So.2d at 938-39. | 1 | 1 |
Congress Life Ins. Co. v. Barstowgreen1 sentence2001See Kmart Corp. v. Bassett, 769 So.2d 282 , 284 n. 1 (Ala.2000)." 799 So.2d at 938-39 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences1998Although generally a trial court's immediate instruction to the jury to disregard an improper prosecutorial question will cure any potential prejudice, Thompson v. State , 503 So.2d at 877 , the question objected to in this case was so prejudicial that the prejudice could not be erased by an instruction. 1998Athough generally a trial court’s immediate instruction to the jury to disregard an improper prosecutorial question will cure any potential prejudice, Thompson v. State, 503 So.2d at 877 , the question objected to in this case was so prejudicial that the prejudice could not be erased by an instruction. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Kuczenska v. State
green
2 sentences1989Kuczenska v. State , 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala. 1980); Kendricks v. State , 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979). 1989Kuczenska v. State, 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala.1980); Kendricks v. State, 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App.1979). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Kendricks v. State
green
2 sentences1989Kuczenska v. State , 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala. 1980); Kendricks v. State , 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979). 1989Kuczenska v. State, 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala.1980); Kendricks v. State, 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App.1979). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Walls v. State
green
2 sentences1989Kuczenska v. State , 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala. 1980); Kendricks v. State , 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979). 1989Kuczenska v. State, 378 So.2d 1182 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979), cert. denied 378 So.2d 1186 (Ala.1980); Kendricks v. State, 378 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Crim.App.1979). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Roundtree v. Brantley
green
1 sentence1997For example, in Roundtree v. Brantley , 34 Ala. 544 (1859), the defendant riparian owner dug a ditch that was alleged to have caused water diverted from a stream to overflow onto an adjacent tract and destroy crops growing on the tract; the defendant's digging of a ditch was held not to be an immediate violation of the plaintiff's rights that would support a trespass claim. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Finberg v. Sullivan
green
1 sentence1985According to petitioners, these requirements emanate from three United States Supreme Court cases which were later followed in Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F.2d 50 (3d Cir.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.