Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1913–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.green2 sentences2005See Mayor & Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc., 372 Md. 514, 550 , 814 A.2d 469, 490 (2002) (stating that “[i]f reasonably possible, a statute is to be read so that no word, phrase, clause, or sentence is rendered surplus-age or meaningless”). *312 Dr. Goldstein further argues that because the PIE Mutual policy states that “any additional claim made for damages resulting from the same injury shall be considered a claim hereunder,” presentment of the medical malpractice claim “comprehended not only the immediate claim set forth in the [medical malpractice] complaint, but also any 2005See Mayor & Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc., 372 Md. 514, 550 , 814 A.2d 469, 490 (2002) (stating that “[i]f reasonably possible, a statute is to be read so that no word, phrase, clause, or sentence is rendered surplus-age or meaningless”). *312 Dr. Goldstein further argues that because the PIE Mutual policy states that “any additional claim made for damages resulting from the same injury shall be considered a claim hereunder,” presentment of the medical malpractice claim “comprehended not only the immediate claim set forth in the [medical malpractice] complaint, but also any | 1 | 1 |
State v. Goodrichgreen1 sentence1992Moreover, it is highly likely that the jury assumed that “what [the defendant] had done to Michael” was a crime similar to the alleged crimes against Peggy. 3 See State v. Goodrich, 432 A.2d 413, 417 (Me. 1981) (in prosecution for rape of ten-year-old daughter, mother’s reference to unspecified incident “ ‘with the other girl’ informed the jury that the defendant may have been involved in unlawful sexual activity with someone other than the prosecutrix, thus unfairly prejudicing the jury against him”). *408 As we recently stated in State v. Hawkins, 326 Md. 270, 276 , 604 A.2d 489 (1992), “[t] | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Damien F.
green
1 sentence2019App. at 568 , 958 A.2d 402 , and the requirement to hold an immediate hearing on shelter care, *568 with notice to the parents, after the local department removes a child, Cts. & Jud. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Chertkov v. State
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Hawkins
green
2 sentences1992Moreover, it is highly likely that the jury assumed that “what [the defendant] had done to Michael” was a crime similar to the alleged crimes against Peggy. 3 See State v. Goodrich, 432 A.2d 413, 417 (Me. 1981) (in prosecution for rape of ten-year-old daughter, mother’s reference to unspecified incident “ ‘with the other girl’ informed the jury that the defendant may have been involved in unlawful sexual activity with someone other than the prosecutrix, thus unfairly prejudicing the jury against him”). *408 As we recently stated in State v. Hawkins, 326 Md. 270, 276 , 604 A.2d 489 (1992), “[t] 1992Moreover, it is highly likely that the jury assumed that “what [the defendant] had done to Michael” was a crime similar to the alleged crimes against Peggy. 3 See State v. Goodrich, 432 A.2d 413, 417 (Me. 1981) (in prosecution for rape of ten-year-old daughter, mother’s reference to unspecified incident “ ‘with the other girl’ informed the jury that the defendant may have been involved in unlawful sexual activity with someone other than the prosecutrix, thus unfairly prejudicing the jury against him”). *408 As we recently stated in State v. Hawkins, 326 Md. 270, 276 , 604 A.2d 489 (1992), “[t] | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Kosmas v. State
green
2 sentences1992This Court has identified several factors to be considered in determining “whether the evidence was so prejudicial that it denied the defendant a fair trial;” that is, whether “the damage in the form of prejudice to the defendant transcended the curative effect of the instruction. . . .” Kosmas v. State, 316 Md. 587, 594 , 560 A.2d 1137 (1989). 1992This Court has identified several factors to be considered in determining “whether the evidence was so prejudicial that it denied the defendant a fair trial;” that is, whether “the damage in the form of prejudice to the defendant transcended the curative effect of the instruction. . . .” Kosmas v. State, 316 Md. 587, 594 , 560 A.2d 1137 (1989). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
cluster 378926
green
1 sentence1989Whether this removal was temporary or permanent, Isbrandtsen would inevitably suffer ‘real, immediate and incalculable’ harm.” Nevada Airlines, Inc. v. Bond, supra, is to the same effect. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
green
2 sentences1976Clearly, Maryland’s mechanics’ lien law does not come close to satisfying the requirements of Mitchell and North Georgia Finishing and thus, unless it can be rescued under the extraordinary circumstances exception mentioned in Fuentes, supra, 407 U. S. at 90-94 , 92 S. Ct. at 1999-2001 , and Sniadach, supra, 395 U. S. at 339 , 89 S. Ct. at 1821 , it is unconstitutional to the extent that it permits a prejudgment seizure. 1976Clearly, Maryland’s mechanics’ lien law does not come close to satisfying the requirements of Mitchell and North Georgia Finishing and thus, unless it can be rescued under the extraordinary circumstances exception mentioned in Fuentes, supra, 407 U. S. at 90-94 , 92 S. Ct. at 1999-2001 , and Sniadach, supra, 395 U. S. at 339 , 89 S. Ct. at 1821 , it is unconstitutional to the extent that it permits a prejudgment seizure. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Fuentes v. Shevin
green
2 sentences1976Clearly, Maryland’s mechanics’ lien law does not come close to satisfying the requirements of Mitchell and North Georgia Finishing and thus, unless it can be rescued under the extraordinary circumstances exception mentioned in Fuentes, supra, 407 U. S. at 90-94 , 92 S. Ct. at 1999-2001 , and Sniadach, supra, 395 U. S. at 339 , 89 S. Ct. at 1821 , it is unconstitutional to the extent that it permits a prejudgment seizure. 1976Clearly, Maryland’s mechanics’ lien law does not come close to satisfying the requirements of Mitchell and North Georgia Finishing and thus, unless it can be rescued under the extraordinary circumstances exception mentioned in Fuentes, supra, 407 U. S. at 90-94 , 92 S. Ct. at 1999-2001 , and Sniadach, supra, 395 U. S. at 339 , 89 S. Ct. at 1821 , it is unconstitutional to the extent that it permits a prejudgment seizure. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Jones v. Montague
green
2 sentences1950Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147 , 24 S. Ct. 611 , 48 L. 1950Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147 , 24 S. Ct. 611 , 48 L. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Creager v. Hooper
neutral
1 sentence1913It was done in Creager v. Hooper, 83 Md. 490 , *520 and Covington v. Buffett, 90 Md. 578 , and these cases are directly in point and are controlling here. . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.