7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1985–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Trimble v. City and County of Denvergreen2 sentences1989Under the doctrine of official immunity a public official enjoys a qualified immunity for discretionary actions — i.e., those involving a judgment on a matter of policy — performed within the scope of his authority, insofar as such actions are "not willful, malicious or intended to cause harm.” Trimble v. City and County of Denver, 697 P.2d 716, 729 (Colo.1985). 1989Second, the doctrine of official immunity applies only to discretionary actions rather than acts involving the performance of “a mandatory duty at the operational level.” Trimble, 697 P.2d at 729 . | 1 | 1 |
Nixon v. Fitzgeraldgreen2 sentences1986See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 , 102 S.Ct. 2690 , 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982). 5 . 1986See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 , 102 S.Ct. 2690 , 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982). 5 . | 1 | 1 |
Antonopoulos v. Town of Telluridegreen2 sentences1985See Antonopoulos v. Town of Telluride, 187 Colo. 392 , 532 P.2d 346 (1975). 1985See Antonopoulos v. Town of Telluride, 187 Colo. 392 , 532 P.2d 346 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1986The court of appeals believed that this court’s abrogation of sovereign immunity in Evans v. Board of County Commissioners, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 (1971), would be rendered meaningless if every governmental entity could enjoy the official immunity of its members. 1986The court of appeals believed that this court’s abrogation of sovereign immunity in Evans v. Board of County Commissioners, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 (1971), would be rendered meaningless if every governmental entity could enjoy the official immunity of its members. | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Cooper v. Hollis
green
2 sentences1986The Chaffee County District Court granted the motion, 2 ruling that the individual members of the parole board enjoyed immunity for their discretionary acts and that this immunity transferred to the parole board as an entity and to the state of Colorado under section 24-10-106(2), 10 C.R.S. (1982). 3 The district court determined that the parole board members were absolutely immune for their discretionary acts as board members and that the state and the parole board could not “be made to answer for actions for which the individual employees were granted immunity.” In the court of appeals the p 1986The Chaffee County District Court granted the motion, 2 ruling that the individual members of the parole board enjoyed immunity for their discretionary acts and that this immunity transferred to the parole board as an entity and to the state of Colorado under section 24-10-106(2), 10 C.R.S. (1982). 3 The district court determined that the parole board members were absolutely immune for their discretionary acts as board members and that the state and the parole board could not “be made to answer for actions for which the individual employees were granted immunity.” In the court of appeals the p | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Moreland v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1988Id. 1988Id. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Mason v. Wrightson
green
2 sentences1986Mason v. Wrightson, 205 Md. 481 , 109 A.2d 128 (1954). 1986Mason v. Wrightson, 205 Md. 481 , 109 A.2d 128 (1954). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Lininger v. Knight
green
2 sentences1985Lininger v. Knight, 123 Colo. 213 , 226 P.2d 809 (1951); MacLarty, supra. Here, McLaughlin’s statements were made before the deputy director of an administrative agency conducting an official hearing, and related to the subject of the inquiry. 1985Lininger v. Knight, 123 Colo. 213 , 226 P.2d 809 (1951); MacLarty, supra. Here, McLaughlin’s statements were made before the deputy director of an administrative agency conducting an official hearing, and related to the subject of the inquiry. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kern v. Miller
green
2 sentences1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). 1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Oyler v. State
green
2 sentences1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). 1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
White v. Towers
green
2 sentences1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). 1985White v. Towers, 37 Cal.2d 727 , 235 P.2d 209 (1951); Kern v. Miller, 216 Kan. 724 , 533 P.2d 1244 (1975); Oyler v. State, 618 P.2d 1042 (Wyo.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Mason v. State
neutral
1 sentence1985Mason v. State, 689 P.2d 199 (Colo.App.1984) (cert. granted Oct. 22, 1984). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kristensen v. Jones
green
2 sentences1985Kristensen v. Jones, 195 Colo. 122 , 575 P.2d 854 (1978). 1985Kristensen v. Jones, 195 Colo. 122 , 575 P.2d 854 (1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.