Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arnold v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Doss v. State, 961 N.W.2d 701 , 713–14 (Iowa 2021) (rejecting a defendant’s “claim that he was misled by his counsel and later blindsided by the” special parole agreements because it did “not ring true in light of everything that was said at sentencing”). “[W]hen an applicant’s assertions [in postconviction proceedings] concerning the knowing and intelligent nature of a guilty plea are directly contradicted by the record, the applicant bears a special burden to establish that the record is inaccurate.” Arnold v. State, 540 N.W.2d 243, 246 (Iowa 1995). | 1 | 1 |
State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph Vancegreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., State v. Vance, 790 N.W.2d 775 , 784–85 (Iowa 2010); see also State v. Reed, 875 N.W.2d 693 , 705 n.5 (Iowa 2016) (“Actual possession requires proof of a defendant’s physical possession of the drugs or firearms at some point in time.” (emphasis added)). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Donald Benjamin Earl Reedgreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., State v. Vance, 790 N.W.2d 775 , 784–85 (Iowa 2010); see also State v. Reed, 875 N.W.2d 693 , 705 n.5 (Iowa 2016) (“Actual possession requires proof of a defendant’s physical possession of the drugs or firearms at some point in time.” (emphasis added)). | 1 | 1 |
Deandre D. Goode v. State of Iowagreen1 sentence2025See Goode, 920 N.W.2d at 524 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Markusgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Markus, 478 N.W.2d 405, 408-09 (Iowa Ct. App. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maxwellgreen1 sentence2017See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Turnergreen2 sentences2017See State v. Turner, 630 N.W.2d 601, 606 (Iowa 2001). “[W]e ‘make an independent evaluation of the totality of the circumstances as shown by the entire record.’” Id. (quoting State v. Howard, 509 N.W.2d 764, 767 (Iowa 1993)). 2017See State v. Turner, 630 N.W.2d 601, 606 (Iowa 2001). “[W]e ‘make an independent evaluation of the totality of the circumstances as shown by the entire record.’” Id. (quoting State v. Howard, 509 N.W.2d 764, 767 (Iowa 1993)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Howardgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Turner, 630 N.W.2d 601, 606 (Iowa 2001). “[W]e ‘make an independent evaluation of the totality of the circumstances as shown by the entire record.’” Id. (quoting State v. Howard, 509 N.W.2d 764, 767 (Iowa 1993)). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Johnnathan Monroe Frenchergreen1 sentence2017See State v. Frencher, 873 N.W.2d 281, 284 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen1 sentence2016See, e.g., State v. Means, No. 14-1376, 2015 WL 6509741 , at *9 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2015) (“It is appropriate for our court to defer to the supreme court on whether to extend the holdings of Null,[2] Pearson,[3] and Lyle to cases where juvenile offenders do not face any mandatory minimum sentences.”); see also State v. Wilson, 234 N.W.2d 140, 141 (Iowa 1975) (noting an action is moot if it no longer presents a justiciable controversy because the issues involved have become academic or nonexistent.) As a result, Moore’s claim concerning his right of allocution is also moot. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Des Moines Civil Service Commission
green
1 sentence2010The court also read Jones v. Des Moines Civil Service Commission, 430 N.W.2d 106 (Iowa 1988), in a manner as to conclude that where there is a civil service employee subject to chapter 400 and a collective bargaining agreement, an “aggrieved employee is entitled to elect his remedy.” The district court then addressed Moore’s motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.