Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Residential and Agricultural Advisory Committee, LLC, an Iowa Limited Liability Company Matt Mescher Allan R. Demmer Catherine Demmer Wayne Ameskamp Sharon Ameskamp Vernon Boge Donald Boge Mary Ann Rubly John R. Rubly Dolores Thier Larry Thier Gary Burkle Cindy Burkle Wayne Vorwald Linda Vorwald Jeff Pape Gerald Wolf And Joanne Wolf v. Dyersville City Council, Mayor Jamegreen2 sentences2022Advisory Comm., LLC v. Dyersville City Council, 888 N.W.2d 24, 49 (Iowa 2016) (“Zoning and land use ordinances that do not impact a suspect classification 49 must only meet the rational relationship test.”). 2022Advisory Comm., LLC v. Dyersville City Council, 888 N.W.2d 24, 49 (Iowa 2016) (“Zoning and land use ordinances that do not impact a suspect classification 49 must only meet the rational relationship test.”). | 3 | 3 |
Blumenthal Investment Trusts v. City of West Des Moinesgreen2 sentences2016Building and Zoning Regulations § 1590, 160–61 (2015); see also Blumenthal, 636 N.W.2d at 268 . 40 We generally consider the federal and state equal protection clauses to be “identical in scope, import, and purpose.” War Eagle Vill. 2016Building and Zoning Regulations § 1590, 160–61 (2015); see also Blumenthal, 636 N.W.2d at 268 . 40 We generally consider the federal and state equal protection clauses to be “identical in scope, import, and purpose.” War Eagle Vill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Fategreen2 sentences2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). 2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Love v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). 2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). 2000See Love v. State, 271 Ga. 398 , 517 S.E.2d 53, 57 (1999); People v. Fate, 159 Ill.2d 267, 271 , 201 Ill.Dec. 117 , 636 N.E.2d 549, 551 (1994); State v. Phillips, 178 Ariz. 368, 371-72 , 873 P.2d 706, 709-10 (Ariz.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Comm'rs for Port of New Orleansgreen2 sentences1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 | 1 | 1 |
Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMgreen2 sentences1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 | 1 | 1 |
United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Stromgreen1 sentence1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.
green
2 sentences1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 1980As noted in United Health Clubs of America, Inc. v. Strom, 423 F.Supp. 761, 765 (D.S.C.1976), “the constitutionality of state statutes which regulate professions or trades invested with a strong public interest have [more recently] been measured ¿gainst the more lenient rational relationship standard” (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796, 801-02 (1957); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 489 , 75 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 99 L.Ed. 563 , 573 (1955); and Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners, 330 U.S. 552, 556 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Green v. Shama
green
1 sentence1980In Green v. Shama, 217 N.W.2d 547, 554 (Iowa 1974), we applied the reasonable relationship test in examining the constitutionality of statutes regulating barbers and cosmetologists. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.