pattern instruction (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

pattern instruction in Idaho

7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Estelle v. McGuiregreen
scotus · 1991 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 72 (1991).

11
State v. Jesse Jay Weeksgreen
idahoctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020See State v. Weeks, 160 Idaho 195, 199 , 370 P.3d 398, 402 (Ct. App. 2016) (holding the trial court properly amended the pattern instruction for the elements of possession of stolen property, ICJI 547, to eliminate a requirement that defendant knew the property at issue was stolen “by another”).

2020See State v. Weeks, 160 Idaho 195, 199 , 370 P.3d 398, 402 (Ct. App. 2016) (holding the trial court properly amended the pattern instruction for the elements of possession of stolen property, ICJI 547, to eliminate a requirement that defendant knew the property at issue was stolen “by another”).

11
State v. Lewisgreen
idahoctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018In State v. Lewis, 126 Idaho 282, 285 , 882 P.2d 449, 452 (Ct. App. 1994), this Court held that the pattern instruction on degree of intoxication (ICJI 1006) adequately informs the jury on the meaning of the phrase driving under the influence, and the words “noticeable” or “perceptible” are not required to be included in the instruction.

2018In State v. Lewis, 126 Idaho 282, 285 , 882 P.2d 449, 452 (Ct. App. 1994), this Court held that the pattern instruction on degree of intoxication (ICJI 1006) adequately informs the jury on the meaning of the phrase driving under the influence, and the words “noticeable” or “perceptible” are not required to be included in the instruction.

11
O'GUIN v. Bingham Countygreen
idaho · 2003 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Ins., 145 Idaho 313, 325 , 179 P.3d 276, 288 (2008); O’Guin v. Bingham Cnty., 139 Idaho 9, 14 , 72 P.3d 849, 854 (2003) (citing with approval the prior version of this pattern instruction that is the same in substance though worded differently).

2015Ins., 145 Idaho 313, 325 , 179 P.3d 276, 288 (2008); O’Guin v. Bingham Cnty., 139 Idaho 9, 14 , 72 P.3d 849, 854 (2003) (citing with approval the prior version of this pattern instruction that is the same in substance though worded differently).

11
Hall v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurancegreen
idaho · 2008 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Ins., 145 Idaho 313, 325 , 179 P.3d 276, 288 (2008); O’Guin v. Bingham Cnty., 139 Idaho 9, 14 , 72 P.3d 849, 854 (2003) (citing with approval the prior version of this pattern instruction that is the same in substance though worded differently).

2015Ins., 145 Idaho 313, 325 , 179 P.3d 276, 288 (2008); O’Guin v. Bingham Cnty., 139 Idaho 9, 14 , 72 P.3d 849, 854 (2003) (citing with approval the prior version of this pattern instruction that is the same in substance though worded differently).

11
Smith v. Sharpgreen
idaho · 1960 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986Proximate cause, in the sense of cause in fact, has been defined as a cause “which in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” Smith v. Sharp, 82 Idaho 420, 426 , 354 P.2d 172, 175 (1960)....

1986Proximate cause, in the sense of cause in fact, has been defined as a cause “which in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” Smith v. Sharp, 82 Idaho 420, 426 , 354 P.2d 172, 175 (1960)....

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Taylor green
idaho · 1939
2 sentences

2002At the time the criminal jury instruction committee drafted the pattern instruction defining gross negligence, the committee cited State v. Taylor, 59 Idaho 724 , 87 P.2d 454 (1939) as the supporting authority for the instruction.

2002At the time the criminal jury instruction committee drafted the pattern instruction defining gross negligence, the committee cited State v. Taylor, 59 Idaho 724 , 87 P.2d 454 (1939) as the supporting authority for the instruction.

12002–2002
State v. Brown green
idaho · 1971
2 sentences

1987In State v. Brown, 94 Idaho 352 , 487 P.2d 946 (1971), and in State v. Bailey, 94 Idaho 285 , 486 P.2d 998 (1971), the Court upheld instructions which, like IDJI 142, contained no Allen charge and made no explicit reference to the cost or inconvenience of retrying the case if a verdict were not reached. 2 IDJI 142 clearly embodies the policy of this state and should be used by Idaho trial courts.

1987In State v. Brown, 94 Idaho 352 , 487 P.2d 946 (1971), and in State v. Bailey, 94 Idaho 285 , 486 P.2d 998 (1971), the Court upheld instructions which, like IDJI 142, contained no Allen charge and made no explicit reference to the cost or inconvenience of retrying the case if a verdict were not reached. 2 IDJI 142 clearly embodies the policy of this state and should be used by Idaho trial courts.

11987–1987
State v. Bailey green
idaho · 1971
2 sentences

1987In State v. Brown, 94 Idaho 352 , 487 P.2d 946 (1971), and in State v. Bailey, 94 Idaho 285 , 486 P.2d 998 (1971), the Court upheld instructions which, like IDJI 142, contained no Allen charge and made no explicit reference to the cost or inconvenience of retrying the case if a verdict were not reached. 2 IDJI 142 clearly embodies the policy of this state and should be used by Idaho trial courts.

1987In State v. Brown, 94 Idaho 352 , 487 P.2d 946 (1971), and in State v. Bailey, 94 Idaho 285 , 486 P.2d 998 (1971), the Court upheld instructions which, like IDJI 142, contained no Allen charge and made no explicit reference to the cost or inconvenience of retrying the case if a verdict were not reached. 2 IDJI 142 clearly embodies the policy of this state and should be used by Idaho trial courts.

11987–1987
Challis Irrigation Co. v. State green
idahoctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1986In Challis Irrigation Co. v. State, 107 Idaho 338 , 689 P.2d 230 (Ct.App.1984), we criticized the pattern instruction as being incomplete.

1986In Challis Irrigation Co. v. State, 107 Idaho 338 , 689 P.2d 230 (Ct.App.1984), we criticized the pattern instruction as being incomplete.

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

CA 172 (1969–2026) IL 146 (1973–2026) KS 96 (1967–2026) WA 95 (1968–2026) MO 71 (1958–2024) NC 62 (1988–2026) GA 56 (1974–2026) MD 46 (1969–2025) CO 41 (1953–2026) TN 24 (1993–2024) IN 21 (1996–2024) NY 15 (1955–2017) WI 11 (1989–2021) WY 11 (1990–2020) MN 10 (1988–2025) MS 9 (1984–2019) NE 9 (2003–2024) AK 7 (1972–2025) FL 7 (1940–2009) ID 7 (1986–2024) TX 7 (1999–2015) MA 6 (1984–2012) SD 5 (2004–2024) DC 5 (2012–2022) ND 4 (1976–2026) MI 4 (1990–2021) IA 4 (2015–2024) OH 4 (2005–2024) NJ 4 (1988–2019) MT 3 (2002–2007) AL 3 (1992–2001) LA 2 (2004–2006) CT 2 (1953–2017) UT 2 (2017–2017) PA 2 (1983–2018) DE 2 (2018–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check