7 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interstate Trust & Banking Companygreen2 sentences2002Clearly, but for the actions of the Attorneys, no fund would have been created for the non-party beneficiaries to receive a refund of state sales taxes paid on manufactured and mobile home purchases. [3] Accordingly, we find no error by the trial court in its conclusion that the fund doctrine was applicable herein and entitled the Attorneys to an attorney fee from the Settlement Fund. [4] See In re Interstate Trust & Banking Company, 235 La. at 842-843 , 106 So.2d at 282 (on rehearing), and Abadie, 164 So.2d at 169-170 . 1990In Re Interstate Trust & Banking Co., 235 La. 825 , 106 So.2d 276, 278 (1958). | 1 | 3 |
Louisiana State Mineral Board v. Abadiegreen2 sentences2002Clearly, but for the actions of the Attorneys, no fund would have been created for the non-party beneficiaries to receive a refund of state sales taxes paid on manufactured and mobile home purchases. [3] Accordingly, we find no error by the trial court in its conclusion that the fund doctrine was applicable herein and entitled the Attorneys to an attorney fee from the Settlement Fund. [4] See In re Interstate Trust & Banking Company, 235 La. at 842-843 , 106 So.2d at 282 (on rehearing), and Abadie, 164 So.2d at 169-170 . 1990In Louisiana State Mineral Board v. Abadie, 164 So.2d 159, 168 (La.App. 1st Cir.1964), one of the cases relied upon by plaintiffs, the court stated that the test to be applied to determine the applicability of the common fund doctrine is whether "the attorney alone and unaided performed the legal services necessary to create, preserve, protect or increase the fund." In this case, the test is obviously not met because the so-called "fund" could not have come about without the efforts of the defendant in putting the leases up for rebid. | 1 | 3 |
Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Financegreen2 sentences2002Ciaccio (retired), Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, is serving as judge pro tempore by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court. [2] We further note that this litigation was not a class action wherein notice would have been statutorily mandated by LSA-C.C.P. art. 594(A)(2). [3] Relying upon two out-of-state cases, Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, 539 N.W.2d 148, 152 (Iowa 1995), and Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Ricks, 885 P.2d 1336 (Okla.1994), the Department additionally argues that the fund doctrine cannot be applied to tax refund cases. 2002Hagge, 539 N.W.2d at 153 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Ricks
green
1 sentence2002Ciaccio (retired), Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, is serving as judge pro tempore by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court. [2] We further note that this litigation was not a class action wherein notice would have been statutorily mandated by LSA-C.C.P. art. 594(A)(2). [3] Relying upon two out-of-state cases, Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, 539 N.W.2d 148, 152 (Iowa 1995), and Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Ricks, 885 P.2d 1336 (Okla.1994), the Department additionally argues that the fund doctrine cannot be applied to tax refund cases. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Bower v. Schumpert Medical Center
green
1 sentence2000Bower, 618 So.2d at 604 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
red
2 sentences1990Attorneys' fees should be paid out of a common fund when "(1) the important right being protected is one actually or necessarily shared by the general public or some class thereof; (2) the plaintiff's pecuniary interest in the outcome, if any, would not normally justify incurring the cost of counsel; and (3) shifting that cost to the defendant would effectively place it on a class that benefits from the litigation." Marshall, J., dissent, Alyeska, supra, 421 U.S. at 285 , 95 S.Ct. at 1635 . 1990Attorneys' fees should be paid out of a common fund when "(1) the important right being protected is one actually or necessarily shared by the general public or some class thereof; (2) the plaintiff's pecuniary interest in the outcome, if any, would not normally justify incurring the cost of counsel; and (3) shifting that cost to the defendant would effectively place it on a class that benefits from the litigation." Marshall, J., dissent, Alyeska, supra, 421 U.S. at 285 , 95 S.Ct. at 1635 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert
green
2 sentences1990The basis for this rule is the principle against unjust enrichment: "persons who *979 obtain the benefit of a lawsuit without contributing to its cost are unjustly enriched at the successful litigant's expense." Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472, 478 , 100 S.Ct. 745, 749 , 62 L.Ed.2d 676 (1980). 1990The basis for this rule is the principle against unjust enrichment: "persons who *979 obtain the benefit of a lawsuit without contributing to its cost are unjustly enriched at the successful litigant's expense." Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert, 444 U.S. 472, 478 , 100 S.Ct. 745, 749 , 62 L.Ed.2d 676 (1980). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Broussard, Broussard & Moresi, Ltd. v. STATE AUTO AND CASUALTY UNDERWRITERS CO.
neutral
1 sentence1982After a learned discussion of the law, the court concluded that: Plaintiffs have relied on Broussard, Broussard & Moresi, Ltd., v. State Auto & Casualty Underwriters, 287 So.2d 544 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973), writ ref., 290 So.2d 908 (La. 1974), and it is indeed, the only jurisprudence in Louisiana favorable to their position. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Broussard, Broussard & M., Ltd. v. STATE A. &. CU CO.
green
1 sentence1982After a learned discussion of the law, the court concluded that: Plaintiffs have relied on Broussard, Broussard & Moresi, Ltd., v. State Auto & Casualty Underwriters, 287 So.2d 544 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973), writ ref., 290 So.2d 908 (La. 1974), and it is indeed, the only jurisprudence in Louisiana favorable to their position. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Louisiana State Mineral Board v. Albarado
green
2 sentences1977Such cases as Louisiana State Mineral Board v. Albarado, 248 La. 551 , 180 So.2d 700 (1965) and In re Interstate Trust & Banking Company, 235 La. 825 , 106 So.2d 276 (1958), while authority for the proposition that an attorney can occasionally recover from one not his client, involve very unusual circumstances. 1977Such cases as Louisiana State Mineral Board v. Albarado, 248 La. 551 , 180 So.2d 700 (1965) and In re Interstate Trust & Banking Company, 235 La. 825 , 106 So.2d 276 (1958), while authority for the proposition that an attorney can occasionally recover from one not his client, involve very unusual circumstances. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
In re Interstate Trust & Banking Co.
green
2 sentences1958It was so regarded by all connected with the litigation.” Due solely to the efforts and industry, of these attorneys in the case of In re Interstate Trust and Banking Company,, 222 La. 979 , 64 So.2d 240 , a fund amounting to more than $700,000 was created and brought into existence, and except for their services none of the depositors would have received any interest on any of their frozen deposits. 1958It was so regarded by all connected with the litigation.” Due solely to the efforts and industry, of these attorneys in the case of In re Interstate Trust and Banking Company,, 222 La. 979 , 64 So.2d 240 , a fund amounting to more than $700,000 was created and brought into existence, and except for their services none of the depositors would have received any interest on any of their frozen deposits. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
McGraw v. Andrus
green
2 sentences1958In McGraw v. Andrus, 45 La.Ann. 1073 , 13 So. 630 , 633, Andrus made what purported to- be a cession of property, but did not include all of his property in the schedule of assets and shortly thereafter began to dispose of the withheld property through a third person. 1958In McGraw v. Andrus, 45 La.Ann. 1073 , 13 So. 630 , 633, Andrus made what purported to be a cession of property, but did not include all of his property in the schedule of assets and shortly thereafter began to dispose of the withheld property through a third person. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.