Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gigot v. Cities Service Oil Co.green2 sentences2010See, e.g., Gigot v. Cities Service Oil Co., 241 Kan. 304, 313-14 , 737 P.2d 18 (1987). 2010See, e.g., Gigot v. Cities Service Oil Co., 241 Kan. 304, 313-14 , 737 P.2d 18 (1987). | 2 | 2 |
cluster 360188green1 sentence2000Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 53 (3d Cir. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'ngreen2 sentences1995See Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'n, 230 Kan. at 130 . 1995See Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'n, 230 Kan. at 130 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shain v. Boeing Military Airplanes
green
2 sentences1999An administrative law judge denied the Fund’s motion to dismiss and the Board dismissed the Fund’s appeal as interlocutory. 22 Kan. 1999App. 2d 913, 916 , 924 P.2d 1280 (1996) (holding that an order denying the Fund’s motion to be dismissed from the case was an appealable order subject to judicial review). | 3 | 1996–1999 |
Young v. Mory
green
2 sentences2010The common fund doctrine was also applied in Young v. Mory, 294 Ill. 2010App. 3d 839 , 690 N.E.2d 1040 (1998), and the majority in Flynn, 312 Mont. 410 , which better express views consistent with this court’s past applications of the common fund doctrine. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Flynn v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
green
2 sentences2010Second, the court found that the common fund doctrine “ ‘has no application here [because] Claimant is not seeking attorney fees for others who may benefit by this decision, rather he is seeking attorney fees with respect to his own entidement.’ [Citation omitted.]” Flynn, 312 Mont, at 413 . 2010Adopting this reasoning, the dissenting justice in the Montana case further noted that the common fund doctrine is “ ‘rooted in the equitable concept of quasi-contract.’ [Citations omitted.] It is applied in cases involving ‘principle^] of representation or agency.’ [Citation omitted.]” Flynn, 312 Mont, at 419 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Neal v. County of Stanislaus
green
2 sentences2010Neal, 141 Cal. App. 3d at 538 . 2010Neal 141 Cal.App.3d at 538 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 324 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Kindred v. City of Omaha Employees' Retirement System
green
2 sentences2010Sys., 252 Neb. 658 , 564 N.W.2d 592 (1997), the claimant sought reimbursement from the City’s retirement system under the common fund doctrine for attorney fees that he incurred in a workers compensation action after the retirement system offset those benefits from his disability retirement pension. 2010Sys., 252 Neb. 658 , 564 N.W.2d 592 (1997), the claimant sought reimbursement from the City’s retirement system under the common fund doctrine for attorney fees that he incurred in a workers compensation action after the retirement system offset those benefits from his disability retirement pension. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Marion Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corporation Disability Income Plan
green
2 sentences2010I would adopt the holdings and rationale of the courts in Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Disability, 341 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2003); Young v. Mory, 294 Ill. 2010In support of Robinson’s argument, she cites Leonard v. Southwestern Bell Corp. Disability, 341 F.3d 696 (8th Cir. 2003), which is representative of one line of cases. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Bruce v. Kelly
green
1 sentence2024Bruce v. Kelly, 316 Kan. 218 , 224, 514 P.3d 1007 (2022). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Nauheim v. City of Topeka
green
2 sentences2024Nauheim v. City of Topeka, 309 Kan. 145, 149 , 432 P.3d 647 (2019). 5 Analysis Benavidez challenges the district court's grant of the Fund's motion to dismiss his claim against the Fund. 2024Nauheim v. City of Topeka, 309 Kan. 145, 149 , 432 P.3d 647 (2019). 5 Analysis Benavidez challenges the district court's grant of the Fund's motion to dismiss his claim against the Fund. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Gannon v. State
green
2 sentences2015Gannon v. State, 298 Kan. 1107, 1196 , 319 P.3d 1196 (2014). 2015Gannon v. State, 298 Kan. 1107, 1196 , 319 P.3d 1196 (2014). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bair v. Peck
green
1 sentence1997Otherwise, the legislature probably would have terminated the Fund and the requirement of mandatory liability insurance altogether; (See Minutes, Special Committee on Commercial & Financial Institutions, Sept. 14, 1988, Attachment of letter from executive director of Kansas Medical Society.) In support of this argument, the defendants cite to Bair, 248 Kan. 824 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.