7 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2022 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences1976In Maryland therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in *657 prejudice to the complaining party...." 273 Md. at 163, n. 2 , 328 A.2d at 281, n. 2 . 1976In Maryland therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in *657 prejudice to the complaining party...." 273 Md. at 163, n. 2 , 328 A.2d at 281, n. 2 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harrington v. California
red
2 sentences2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ 2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ | 4 | 1976–2022 |
Milton v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ 2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ | 4 | 1976–2022 |
Brown v. United States
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ 2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ | 4 | 1976–2022 |
Schneble v. Florida
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ 2022Indeed, in Dorsey, this Court described several post- Chapman Supreme Court harmless error cases as recognizing cumulativeness as one of two bases for concluding that an error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt: In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding “harmless error.” In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been “ | 4 | 1976–2022 |
United States v. Hasting
green
2 sentences2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). 2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Savoy v. State
green
2 sentences2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). 2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Sullivan v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). 2022Thus, the Chapman inquiry of “whether the same verdict of guilty- beyond-a-reasonable-doubt would have been rendered absent the constitutional error is utterly meaningless.” Id. 5 As this Court has previously noted, “not all errors in a reasonable doubt instruction are of constitutional magnitude.” Savoy, 420 Md. at 238 . 19 The case of United States v. Hasting is also instructive. 461 U.S. 499 (1983). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Kotteakos v. United States
green
2 sentences1976In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding "harmless error." In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been "so overwhelming," and the prejudicial effect of the erroneously admitted evidence so insignificant by comparison, or to have been cumulative, that it was able to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the erroneou 1976In Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (1969), Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972), Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U.S. 371 (1972) and Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 (1973), the Supreme Court invoked the Chapman test in finding "harmless error." In each of these cases, that Court, upon an independent review of the record, found the properly admitted evidence to have been "so overwhelming," and the prejudicial effect of the erroneously admitted evidence so insignificant by comparison, or to have been cumulative, that it was able to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the erroneou | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Noel v. State
green
2 sentences1974In Maryland, therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in prejudice to the complaining party, Nixon v. State, 204 Md. 475 , 105 A. 2d 243 (1954), Noel v. State, 202 Md. 247 , 90 A. 2d 7 (1953). 1974In Maryland, therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in prejudice to the complaining party, Nixon v. State, 204 Md. 475 , 105 A. 2d 243 (1954), Noel v. State, 202 Md. 247 , 90 A. 2d 7 (1953). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Nixon v. State
green
2 sentences1974In Maryland, therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in prejudice to the complaining party, Nixon v. State, 204 Md. 475 , 105 A. 2d 243 (1954), Noel v. State, 202 Md. 247 , 90 A. 2d 7 (1953). 1974In Maryland, therefore, the test is whether the erroneous exclusion of evidence results in prejudice to the complaining party, Nixon v. State, 204 Md. 475 , 105 A. 2d 243 (1954), Noel v. State, 202 Md. 247 , 90 A. 2d 7 (1953). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.