Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gollahergreen2 sentences2022See State v. Gollaher, 2020 UT App 131, ¶ 20 , 474 P.3d 1018 . 2022See State v. Gollaher, 2020 UT App 131, ¶ 20 , 474 P.3d 1018 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.green2 sentences2012See, e.g., United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 460 , 98 S.Ct. 2864 , 57 L.Ed.2d 854 (1978) (finding prejudice when the judge met privately with the foreman of the jury and gave what amounted to a supplemental jury instruction}. . 2012See, e.g., United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 438 U.S. 422, 460 , 98 S.Ct. 2864 , 57 L.Ed.2d 854 (1978) (finding prejudice when the judge met privately with the foreman of the jury and gave what amounted to a supplemental jury instruction}. . | 1 | 1 |
Oliver French, Jr. v. Kurt Jonesgreen1 sentence2012See, eg., Caver v. Straub, 349 F.3d 340 , 349 n. 6 (6th Cir.2003) (finding a critical stage when the jury was reinstructed "on certain elements of the offense after they had deliberated"); French v. Jones, 332 F.3d 430, 436, 438 (6th Cir.2003) (finding a critical stage when the judge gave a supplemental jury instruction that was not the standard deadlock instruction). . | 1 | 1 |
Robert Lee Caver v. Dennis M. Straub, Wardengreen1 sentence2012See, eg., Caver v. Straub, 349 F.3d 340 , 349 n. 6 (6th Cir.2003) (finding a critical stage when the jury was reinstructed "on certain elements of the offense after they had deliberated"); French v. Jones, 332 F.3d 430, 436, 438 (6th Cir.2003) (finding a critical stage when the judge gave a supplemental jury instruction that was not the standard deadlock instruction). . | 1 | 1 |
Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2012Valentine v. United States, 488 F.3d 325, 335 (6th Cir.2007). . | 1 | 1 |
Rushen v. Spaingreen2 sentences2012Rushen, 464 U.S. at 117, 119 , 104 S.Ct. 453 (explaining that the Court "emphatically disagree[d]" with the Ninth Circuit's conclusion that "unrecorded ex parte communication between trial judge and juror can never be harmless error"). . 2012Rushen, 464 U.S. at 117, 119 , 104 S.Ct. 453 (explaining that the Court "emphatically disagree[d]" with the Ninth Circuit's conclusion that "unrecorded ex parte communication between trial judge and juror can never be harmless error"). . | 1 | 1 |
Laws v. Blanding Citygreen1 sentence1998“Determining the propriety of jury instructions presents a question of law, which we review under a correction of error standard.” Laws v. Blanding City, 893 P.2d 1083, 1084 (Utah Ct.App.), cert. denied, 910 P.2d 425 (Utah 1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 10856412
green
1 sentence2026Because we conclude that the erroneous instruction harmed Paramoure, we reverse his conviction and remand the matter for a new trial. 20240381-CA 11 2026 UT App 74 | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Scott
green
1 sentence2017The threat’s content is not included in the record on appeal, and we do not rely upon it in our analysis. 20140995-CA 5 2017 UT App 74 State v. Scott ‚absolute impasse‛ meant that the jury could not ‚continu*e+ to deliberate without doing violence to their individual judgment.‛ The court denied the motion for a mistrial and instead gave a supplemental jury instruction, which asked the jury to ‚continue [its] deliberations in an effort to agree upon a verdict.‛ The instruction stated, in part, This trial represents a significant expenditure of time and effort by you, the court, the parties, and | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Stringham
green
2 sentences2015"Failure to give requested jury instructions constitutes reversible error only if their omission tends to mislead the jury to the prejudice of the complaining party or insufficiently or erroneously advises the jury on the law." State v. Stringham, 2001 UT App 13, ¶ 17 , 17 P.3d 1153 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2015"Failure to give requested jury instructions constitutes reversible error only if their omission tends to mislead the jury to the prejudice of the complaining party or insufficiently or erroneously advises the jury on the law." State v. Stringham, 2001 UT App 13, ¶ 17 , 17 P.3d 1153 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Tolano
green
2 sentences2013Davis also relies on State v. Tolano, 2001 UT App 37 , 19 P.3d 400 . 2013Davis also relies on State v. Tolano, 2001 UT App 37 , 19 P.3d 400 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Allen v. United States
green
2 sentences1998As first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 , 17 S.Ct. 154 , 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), when a jury informs the trial court that they are having difficulty agreeing, the court may underscore the case’s importance, urge the jury to reach an agreement, and send them back for further deliberation. 1998As first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 , 17 S.Ct. 154 , 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), when a jury informs the trial court that they are having difficulty agreeing, the court may underscore the case’s importance, urge the jury to reach an agreement, and send them back for further deliberation. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.