Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 795075green2 sentences2011Litig., 455 F.3d 160, 166 (3d Cir.2006)). a. 2011Summation I recognize that the Gunter/Prudential factors “ ‘need not be applied in a formulaic way’ because each case is different, ‘and in certain cases, one factor may outweigh the rest.’ ” In re AT & T, 455 F.3d at 166 (citing In re Rite Aid. 396 F.3d at 301 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. United States
green
2 sentences2018"Exclusion is 'not a personal constitutional right,' nor is it designed to 'redress the injury' occasioned by an unconstitutional search." Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 ,.236, 131 S. Ct. 2419 , 180 L. 2018"Exclusion is 'not a personal constitutional right,' nor is it designed to 'redress the injury' occasioned by an unconstitutional search." Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 ,.236, 131 S. Ct. 2419 , 180 L. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Ford v. Logan
green
2 sentences2005This exception was first articulated in a case dealing with a county initiative, Ford, 79 Wn.2d 147 , and later applied to a statewide initiative in Philadelphia II, 128 Wn.2d 707 . 2005This exception was first articulated in a case dealing with a county initiative, Ford, 79 Wash.2d 147 , 483 P.2d 1247 , and later applied to a statewide initiative in Philadelphia II, 128 Wash.2d 707 , 911 P.2d 389 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Philadelphia II v. Gregoire
green
2 sentences2005This exception was first articulated in a case dealing with a county initiative, Ford, 79 Wn.2d 147 , and later applied to a statewide initiative in Philadelphia II, 128 Wn.2d 707 . 2005This exception was first articulated in a case dealing with a county initiative, Ford, 79 Wash.2d 147 , 483 P.2d 1247 , and later applied to a statewide initiative in Philadelphia II, 128 Wash.2d 707 , 911 P.2d 389 . | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Paradise Orchards General Partnership v. Fearing
green
1 sentence2015App. 507, 516 , 94 P.3d 372 (2004). ¶21 In the first appeal, we held that Prudential’s claim “[could not] be resolved as a matter of law on the bases urged by the Youngs.” Young, 163 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Washington Professional Real Estate, LLC v. Young
green
1 sentence2015App. 507, 516 , 94 P.3d 372 (2004). ¶21 In the first appeal, we held that Prudential’s claim “[could not] be resolved as a matter of law on the bases urged by the Youngs.” Young, 163 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Diet Drugs
green
1 sentence2011These Gunter/Prudential factors are not exhaustive, and a district court should consider “ ‘any other factors that are useful and relevant with respect to the particular facts of the case.’ ” In re Diet Drugs, 582 F.3d at 541 n. 34 (quoting In re AT & T Corp. Sec. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation
green
2 sentences2011District courts “must make findings as to each of the Girsh factors, and the Prudential factors where appropriate,” and “cannot substitute the parties’ assurances or conclusory statements for [their] independent analysis of the settlement terms.” In re Pet Food. 629 F.3d at 350-51 . 2011District courts “must make findings as to each of the Girsh factors, and the Prudential factors where appropriate,” and “cannot substitute the parties’ assurances or conclusory statements for [their] independent analysis of the settlement terms.” In re Pet Food. 629 F.3d at 350-51 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Rite Aid Corporation Securities Litigation Class Member/objector Walter Kaufmann
green
2 sentences2011Summation I recognize that the Gunter/Prudential factors “ ‘need not be applied in a formulaic way’ because each case is different, ‘and in certain cases, one factor may outweigh the rest.’ ” In re AT & T, 455 F.3d at 166 (citing In re Rite Aid. 396 F.3d at 301 ). 2011Id. (citing In re Rite Aid, 396 F.3d at 302 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Roger Crane & Associates, Inc. v. Felice
green
1 sentence2011In a letter to the parties announcing its decision, the court cited Roger Crane & Associates v. Felice, 74 Wn. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
PHILADELPHIA II v. Gregoire
green
1 sentence2005This exception was first articulated in a case dealing with a county initiative, Ford, 79 Wash.2d 147 , 483 P.2d 1247 , and later applied to a statewide initiative in Philadelphia II, 128 Wash.2d 707 , 911 P.2d 389 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.