6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hodges v. Huckabeegreen2 sentences2006See Hodges, 333 Ark. 247 , 968 S.W.2d 619 . 2006See Hodges, 333 Ark. 247 , 968 S.W.2d 619 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kremen v. Cohen
green
1 sentence2016Similarly, in Kremen v. Cohen, 337 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir.2003), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that an Internet domain name is a form of intangible property that could serve as basis for a conversion claim under California law. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Buck v. Gillham
green
1 sentence2015Buck v. Gillham, 80 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
DLC Props. LLC v. Carmike Cinemas Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2015DLC also contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for new trial because (1) the verdict violated the doctrine of election of remedies, (2) there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of damages on the conversion claim, and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of damages for the unlawful detainer and entry Cite as 2015 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Seay v. C.A.R. Transportation Brokerage Co.
green
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.
green
2 sentences2002In McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp., 331 Ark. 242 , 961 S.W.2d 729 (1998), the Arkansas Supreme Court drew a distinction between legal fees incurred in attempting to recover collateral and those incurred in litigating a conversion claim. 2002In McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp., 331 Ark. 242 , 961 S.W.2d 729 (1998), the Arkansas Supreme Court drew a distinction between legal fees incurred in attempting to recover collateral and those incurred in litigating a conversion claim. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.